Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Investigating Pedagogies in Undergraduate Precalculus and their Relationships to Students’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics and Perseverance in Problem-Solving

Amy Daniel 1 * ,
Joseph DiNapoli 1
1 Montclair State University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 7, Issue SI, June 2024, pp. 61-83
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 582 DOWNLOADS: 613 Publication date: 15 Jun 2024
ABSTRACT
This exploratory study investigated the relationships between professors’ enactments of a research-based precalculus curriculum (Pathways) and changes observed in students’ attitudes towards mathematics and perseverance in problem-solving. While much research focuses on improving student achievement in undergraduate STEM courses, it is also important to support students in developing the positive dispositions and practices needed to sustain them through years of mathematics-based STEM coursework. We therefore investigated the way three professors implemented Pathways, assessing via observation their pedagogical choices across three Pathways-aligned dimensions; we also investigated the changes in attitudes and perseverance of students in these professors’ classes. Our results suggest that although the Pathways precalculus curriculum may support the development of positive attitudes toward mathematics and improved perseverance in problem-solving, this potential is influenced by professors’ pedagogical choices. This research helps us better understand the connections between pedagogies enacted in STEM-gateway courses and students’ development of productive ways of engaging with mathematics.
KEYWORDS
Precalculus, Attitudes towards mathematics, Perseverance in problem-solving, Curriculum, Undergraduate Mathematics Education
CITATION (APA)
Daniel, A., & DiNapoli, J. (2024). Investigating Pedagogies in Undergraduate Precalculus and their Relationships to Students’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics and Perseverance in Problem-Solving. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(SI), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.314SI
REFERENCES
  1. Aikens, M. L., Eaton, C. D., & Highlander, H. C. (2021). The case for biocalculus: Improving student understanding of the utility value of mathematics to biology and affect toward mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0124
  2. Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
  3. Barnes, A. (2019). Perseverance in mathematical reasoning: The role of children’s conative focus in the productive interplay between cognition and affect. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2019.1590229
  4. Bass, H., & Ball, D. L. (2015). Beyond “you can do it!”: Developing mathematical perseverance in elementary school. Spencer. http://www.spencer.org/collected-papers-april-2015
  5. Boelkins, M., Austin, D., & Schlicker, S. (2018). Active calculus. Grand Valley State University Libraries. Retrieved February 21, 2024, from https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/books/18/
  6. Bowers, J., Smith, W., Ren, L., & Hanna, R. (2019). Integrating active learning labs in precalculus: Measuring the value added. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2017.1375355
  7. Bressoud, D. M., Carlson, M.P., Mesa, V. & Rasmussen, C. L. (2013). The calculus student: Insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.798874
  8. Bressoud, D. M., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. L. (2015). Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus. MAA Press. https://maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cspcc/InsightsandRecommendations.pdf
  9. Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
  10. Carlson, M., Larsen, S., & Lesh, R. (2003). Integrating a models and modeling perspective with existing research and practice. In R. Lesh and H. Doerr (Eds), Beyond Constructivism: A Models and Modeling Perspective on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and teaching, pp. 465–478. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607713
  11. Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M., & Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 113-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676587
  12. Carlson, M. P., Oehrtman, M., Moore, K. C. & O’Bryan, A. (2021). Precalculus pathways to calculus: A problem solving approach. Hayden-McNeil. www.rationalreasoning.net/products.php
  13. Collins, B. V. C. (2019). Flipping the precalculus classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(5), 728-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1535098
  14. Common Core State Standards Initiative [CCSSI] (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. https://www.thecorestandards.org/Math/
  15. Cooper, T., Bailey, B., Briggs, K., & Holliday, J. (2017). Assessing student openness to inquiry-based learning in precalculus. PRIMUS, 27(7), 736-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1183155
  16. DiNapoli, J. (2019). Persevering toward what? Investigating the relationship between ninth-grade students’ achievement goals and perseverant actions on an algebraic task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 435-453. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5747
  17. DiNapoli, J. (2023). Distinguishing between grit, persistence, and perseverance for learning mathematics with understanding. Education Sciences, 13(4), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040402
  18. DiNapoli, J., & Miller. E. K. (2022). Recognizing, supporting, and improving student perseverance in mathematical problem-solving: The role of conceptual thinking scaffolds. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100965
  19. DiNapoli, J., & Morales, Jr., H. (2021). Translanguaging to persevere is key for Latinx bilinguals’ mathematical success. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 14(2), 71-104. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v14i2a390
  20. Flores, E. G. K. (2018). Sparky the Saguaro: Teaching experiments examining students' development of the idea of logarithm. (Publication No. 10810842) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest. https://keep.lib.asu.edu/items/156439
  21. Frank, K. M. (2017). Examining the development of students' covariational reasoning in the context of graphing. (Publication No. 10607865) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest. https://keep.lib.asu.edu/items/155768
  22. Goyer, A., Lynch, A., & Wand, J. (2021). A redesign of precalculus at California State University, Monterey Bay. PRIMUS, 31(3-5), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1746451
  23. Gruber, S., Rosca, R. I., Chazan, D., Fleming, E., Balady, S., VanNetta, C., & Okoudjou, K. A. (2021). Active learning in an undergraduate precalculus course: Insights from a course redesign. PRIMUS, 31(3-5), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1772920
  24. Harris, D., Black, L., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Pepin, B., Williams, J., & TransMaths Team. (2015). Mathematics and its value for engineering students: What are the implications for teaching? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.979893
  25. Jacobson, M. J., Vulic, J., & Levin, J. A. (2024). Nexus for STEM problem solving and transfer research: Instruction first or Productive Failure first? In L. D. English & T. Lehmann (Eds.), Ways of Thinking in STEM-based Problem Solving: Teaching and Learning in a New Era. Routledge. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~jalevin/Jacobson-Levin-Vulick-Chapter-2024-in-press.pdf
  26. Klee, H. L., Buehl, M. M., & Miller, A. D. (2022). Strategies for alleviating students’ math anxiety: Control-value theory in practice. Theory Into Practice, 61(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1932157
  27. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
  28. McNicholl, T. H., Frank, K., Hogenson, K., Roat J., & Carlson, M. P. (2021). Improving student success and supporting student meaning-making in large-lecture precalculus classes, PRIMUS, 31(7), 792-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1737850
  29. Mkhatshwa, T. (2021). An investigation of students’ content understanding, perception changes, and experiences in a flipped precalculus course. AURCO Journal, 27, 41-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352309005
  30. Middleton, J. A., Tallman, M., Hatfield, N., & Davis, O. (2015). Taking the severe out of perseverance: Strategies for building mathematical determination. Spencer. http://www.spencer.org/collected-papers-april-2015
  31. Morales, Jr., H. & DiNapoli, J. (2018). Latinx bilingual students’ perseverance on a mathematical task: A rehumanizing perspective. REDIMAT: Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 226-250. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2018.3274
  32. Moore, K. C. (2010). The role of quantitative reasoning in precalculus students learning central concepts of trigonometry. (Publication No. 3425753) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4ee6530f76adef832199594eadcd6faf/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
  33. Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.001
  34. Morris, P., Agbonlahor, O., Winters, R., & Donelson, B. (2023). Self-efficacy curriculum and peer leader support in gateway college mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09424-y
  35. Newhart, M., & Patten, M. L. (2023). Understanding research methods : An overview of the essentials. Pyrczak Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003092049
  36. Noyes, A. (2012). It matters which class you are in: Student-centered teaching and the enjoyment of learning mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.734974
  37. O’Meara, J., & Vaidya, A. (2021). A network theory approach to curriculum design. Entropy, 23(10), 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23101346
  38. Peterson, C. (2019). The effect of intentional, persistent small-group learning on college student achievement and retention in the pre-calculus classroom. (Publication No. 13878102) [Doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology]. ProQuest. https://repository.iit.edu/islandora/object/islandora%3A1000852
  39. Reiser, B. J., & Tabak, I. (2014). Scaffolding. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 44–62). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
  40. Schettino, C. (2016). A framework for problem-based learning: Teaching mathematics with a relational problem-based pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1602
  41. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334–370). MacMillan. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1992-97586-000
  42. Schoenfeld, A. H., Floden, R. E., & the Algebra Teaching Study and Mathematics Assessment Project. (2014). The TRU math scoring rubric. Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley & College of Education, Michigan State University. Retrieved from https://truframework.org/scoring-rubric/.
  43. Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., & Harper, R. P. (Eds.). (2019). Talking about leaving revisited: Persistence, relocation, and loss in undergraduate STEM education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25304-2
  44. Sonnert, G., Barnett, M. D., & Sadler, P. M. (2020). The effects of mathematics preparation and mathematics attitudes on college calculus performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.2019.0009
  45. Ruthven, K. (2011). Using international study series and meta-analytic research syntheses to scope pedagogical development aimed at improving student attitude and achievement in school mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 419-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9243-2
  46. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 319–369). Information Age. https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Second-Handbook-Research-Mathematics-Teaching-Learning
  47. Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16-22. https://www.rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/cho25344l.htm
  48. Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covaration, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai’s (Ed.) Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 421-456). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/Store/Products/Compendium-for-Research-in-Mathematics-Education/
  49. Wu, X., Rambo-Hernandez, K., Fuller, E., & Deshler, J. (2022). Predicting STEM persistence from mathematics affect, pedagogical perceptions and Calculus I setting, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(7), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2107957
  50. Zack, L., Fuselier, J., Graham-Squire, A., Lamb, R., & O’Hara, K. (2015). Flipping freshman mathematics. PRIMUS, 25(9-10), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031302
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.