Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Global Competency Integration in STEAM Fields in Higher Education

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 7, Issue SI, 2024, pp. 85-115
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 274 DOWNLOADS: 110 Publication date: 15 Jun 2024
ABSTRACT
The concept of Global Competency (GC) has a growing presence in many collegiate mission statements in the United States. This interconnected, multidisciplinary approach coincides with that of the concept of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education. The focus of this study was to identify what extent GC is present in the classrooms and curriculums, as well as the implementation methods higher education instructors observe and / or utilize in their STEAM field programs. The participants in this study were STEAM-field instructors at higher education institutions in the United States in which GC or an equivalent term is located in their mission or strategic plan. Seventy-six instructors from the midwestern United States completed a survey to generate a GC integration score, and 13 of those also participated in an interview. The quantitative analysis identified a statistically significant difference between the integration scores of Arts and Science instructors and Arts and Engineering instructors. Qualitative analysis identified curriculum and instruction-based strategies of successful integration, common barriers to integration, and the sentiment that integration varies greatly from a regional and sometimes institution-wide setting. The findings of this study can help standardize the concept and integration of GC in higher education as well as provide curriculum developers and administrators with a look at how GC is represented in the current climate of higher education.
KEYWORDS
Global Competency, STEAM, Curriculum, Higher Education
CITATION (APA)
Bushey, L. J. (2024). Global Competency Integration in STEAM Fields in Higher Education. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(SI), 85-115. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.315SI
SUPPLEMENTARY FILES
Reviewer 2 Comments
REFERENCES
  1. Alghamdi, A. A. (2023). Exploring Early Childhood Teachers’ Beliefs About STEAM Education in Saudi Arabia. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01303-0
  2. Alkin, M. C. (1973). Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Curriculum and Instructional Reform (Vol. 19, Issue 2).
  3. Arar, K., Brooks, J. S., & Bogotch, I. (2019). Education, Immigration and Migration: Policy, Leadership and Praxis for a Changing World. In Education, Immigration and Migration (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-044-420191003
  4. Ballard, S., Carroll, E., Baugh, E., Taylor, A., Jorgensen, B., Bollinger, E., & Coughlin, D. (2013). Think-Value-Communicate-Lead (TVCL): A Framework For Developing Family Professionals. Family Science Review, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.26536/fsr.2013.18.02.04
  5. Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
  6. Brown, A. (2015). Promoting Global and Comparative Understandings of Education: My YearLong Journey. https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
  7. Carter, A. (2020). In Search of the Ideal Tool for International School Teachers to Increase their Global Competency: An Action Research Analysis of the Global Competency Learning Continuum. Journal of Research in International Education, 19(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240920916045
  8. Carter, C. E., Barnett, H., Burns, K., Cohen, N., Durall, E., Lordick, D., Nack, F., Newman, A., & Ussher, S. (2021). Defining STEAM Approaches for Higher Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/11354
  9. Catterall, L. (2017). A Brief History of STEM and STEAM from an Inadvertent Insider. STEAM, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20170301.05
  10. Chandir, H., & Gorur, R. (2021). Unsustainable Measures? Assessing Global Competence in PISA 2018. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.4716
  11. Chung, S. K., & Li, D. (2021). Issues-based steam education: A case study in a Hong Kong secondary school. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 22(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea22n3
  12. Dahlem, S. (2023). Students Arts Participation Increases STEM Motivation via Self-Efficacy. STEAM, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.SBZN9958
  13. Doron, N. (1977). Typology of Students’ Tracks of Growth, According to Patterns of Implementing a New Educational Program [Abstract]. Studies in Education, 15, 39–46.
  14. Ekici, C. (2010). Treatments of Trigonometric Functions During Reforms in the United States.
  15. Fatimah, A. T., Isyanto, A. Y., Toto, T., & Andriana, B. B. (2023). Paving the way for integrated STEAM-H education in agricultural product processing vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.53861
  16. Graham, M. A. (2021). The disciplinary borderlands of education: art and STEAM education (Los límites disciplinares de la educación: arte y educación STEAM). Infancia y Aprendizaje, 44(4), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926163
  17. Ibrahim, T. (2005). Global citizenship education: Mainstreaming the curriculum? In Cambridge Journal of Education (Vol. 35, Issue 2, pp. 177–194). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500146823
  18. Iqbal, S., Miller, J., & Smith, W. (2021). A Mars Rover globally collaborative STEAM project. National Science Teaching Association, 58(6), 54–59. www.nsta.org/science-and-children
  19. Jantakun, T., Jantakun, K., & Jantakoon, T. (2021). STEAM Education Using Design Thinking Process Through Virtual Communities of Practice (STEAM-DT-VCoPs). Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), 249. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v7i1.18420
  20. Kang, N. H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. In Asia-Pacific Science Education (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 1–22). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y
  21. Kinzie, J., Helms, R. M., & Cole, J. (2017). Assessing Global Learning. Liberal Education, 30–37.
  22. Ledesma, M. C., & Calderón, D. (2015). Critical Race Theory in Education: A Review of Past Literature and a Look to the Future. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414557825
  23. Lewis, A. L. (2015). Putting the “H” in STEAM: Paradigms for Modern Liberal Arts Education. In Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education (pp. 259–275). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_14
  24. Li, J., & Xu, J. (2016). Investigating Causality between Global Experience and Global Competency for Undergraduates in Contemporary China’s Higher Education: A Transformative Learning Theory Perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p155
  25. Liu, Y., Yin, Y., & Wu, R. (2020). Measuring graduate students’ global competence: Instrument development and an empirical study with a Chinese sample. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2020.100915
  26. Maeda, J. (2013). STEM + Art = STEAM. STEAM, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.201301.34
  27. OECD. (2018). Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The OECD PISA global competence framework.
  28. Parmigiani, D., Jones, S. L., Kunnari, I., & Nicchia, E. (2022). Global competence and teacher education programmes. A European perspective. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2022996
  29. Ravitz, J. (2014). A Survey for Measuring 21st Century Teaching and Learning: West Virginia 21st Century Teaching and Learning Survey. West Virginia Department of Education, 28, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2246.6647
  30. Rodríguez-Nieto, C. A., & Alsina, Á. (2022). Networking Between Ethnomathematics, STEAM Education, and the Globalized Approach to Analyze Mathematical Connections in Daily Practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11710
  31. Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2017). Polysemic interactions of ethnomathematics: an overview. ETD - Educação Temática Digital, 19(3), 589. https://doi.org/10.20396/etd.v19i3.8648365
  32. Saldaña, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Vol. 3).
  33. Sälzer, C., & Roczen, N. (2018). Assessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18546/ijdegl.10.1.02
  34. Schleicher, A. (2014a). For Official Use EDU/PISA/GB(2014)16 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  35. Schleicher, A. (2014b). PISA 2018 Framework Plans: 38th meeting of the PISA Governing Board.
  36. Topalska, R. (2021). STEAM Education in the View of the Bulgarian Teacher. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1822–1827. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM104-45
  37. Vera Cruz, A. C., Madden, P. E., & Asante, C. K. (2018). Toward Cross-Cultural Curriculum Development: An Analysis of Science Education in the Philippines, Ghana, and the United States. In Intercultural Studies of Curriculum (pp. 37–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60897-6_3
  38. Wajngurt, C., & Sloan, P. J. (2014). Overcoming Gender Bias in STEM: The Effect of Adding the Arts (STEAM). InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 14, 13–28.
  39. Yamada, A. (2021). Japanese Higher Education: The Need for STEAM in Society 5.0, an Era of Societal and Technological Fusion. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 13(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v13i1.1980
LICENSE
Creative Commons License