Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Women Missing in STEM Careers: A Critical Review through the Gender Lens

Shamnaz Arifin Mim 1 *
1 BRAC University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 2, Issue 2, May 2019, pp. 59-70
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 939 DOWNLOADS: 518 Publication date: 15 May 2019
ABSTRACT
Although the number of female science students has   increased at secondary level in many countries since 1990, this has not translated into pursuing a STEM education at tertiary level and not even into STEM jobs. It is thus important to analyze this issue of female participation in STEM disciplines, since t    heir inclusion would empower them by improving the economy, health, and infrastructure worldwide and help to fight poverty internationally with technological and scientific interventions. This narrative review article aims to analyze the  reasons behind female underrepresentation in STEM careers using the “feminist research methodological”  approach. Underlying the conceptualization of gendering science, two specific concepts, gender role and empowerment, have been used. Here I have analyzed the educational, attitudinal, socio-cultural, and socioeconomic aspects of why there are so few women in STEM careers. This analysis introduces some important concerns that can be focused on during policy implication to ensure gender equality in STEM careers.  This article highlights the socialization process of young students (especially girls), who are expected to perform their stereotyped gender roles consciously or subconsciously both in the family and educational settings. These gendered ideologies are clearly interlinked to the career they become interested or influenced in. The analysis reflects and recommends that subject domains and job sectors should be gender neutral where life experiences and interests of individuals should be emphasized. Such important concerns raised in this article would help educators in policy implication to ensure gender equality in STEM careers.
KEYWORDS
Gender role, Science Careers, STEM, Girls’ empowerment
CITATION (APA)
Mim, S. A. (2019). Women Missing in STEM Careers: A Critical Review through the Gender Lens. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.221
REFERENCES
  1. Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household, Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51.
  2. Ali, M. S. & Awan, A.S. (2013). Attitude Towards Science and Its Relationship with Students’ Achievement in Science, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(10), 707-718. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1324456533?pq-origsite=gscholar
  3. Allgeier, E. R. & McCormick, N. (1983). The Intimate Relationship between Gender Roles and Sexuality. In E.R.
  4. Allgeier, & N. McCormick (Eds.), Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior (pp. 1-15).
  5. Mayfield Publishing Company.
  6. Archer, L. et al. (2013). Adolescent Boys’ Science Aspirations: Masculinity, Capital and Power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1-30. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259543335_Adolescent_boys'_science_aspirations_Masculinity_capit al_and_power
  7. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter? Gender and Education,
  8. 17(4), 369-386. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540250500145072
  9. Brainard, S.G. & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 17-27.
  10. Connell, R. W. (1999). The Social Organization of Masculinity. In R.W. Connell (Ed.), Masculinities (pp. 67-81). Berkeley: University of California Press. Retrieved from https://genderandmasculinities.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/robert-w-connell-masculinities-second-edition-
  11. 3.pdf
  12. Enloe, C. (2014). Women’s labour is Never Cheap: Gendering Global Blue Jeans and Bankers. In C. Enloe (Ed.), Bananas, Beaches and Bases. Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (pp. 250-304). Berkeley:
  13. University of California Press.
  14. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing Narrative Style Literature Review. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/Brac/Downloads/2047480615z2e000000000329.pdf
  15. Girls inc. (2014). Girls Inc. Operation SMART: Science, Math and Relevant Technology. Retrieved from http://www.girlsinc.org/resources/programs/girls-inc-operation-smart.html
  16. Herz, B. K. & Sperling, G. B. (2004). What Works in Girls’ Education: Evidence and Policies from the Developing World, Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://books.google.nl/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7a0W_bqvzA0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=invest+on+girls+scienc e+education&ots=UdGSuMkUVd&sig=eYM9Vf5w9MWHehQnIknJTMngDEQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
  17. Hill, C., Corbett, C. & Andresse, S.R. (2010). Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, AAUW, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.aauw.org/resource/why-so-few-womenin-science-technology-engineering-mathematics/
  18. Kabreer, N. (2010). Voice, Agency and the Sounds of Silence: A Comment on Jane L. Parpart’s Paper. Working Paper No. 297. Michigan State University, 206 International Center, East Lansing, MI 48824-1035.
  19. Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552070512331332273
  20. Kelly, A. (1985). The Construction of Masculine Science, British Council of Sociology of Education, 6(2), 133-154.
  21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1393046?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents van de Werfhorst, H. G. et al. (2010). ‘Social Class, Ability and Choice of Subject in Secondary and Tertiary Education in Britain’, British Educational Research Journal 29 (1), 41-62. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0141192032000057366#.VXrl_fmqqko
  22. Miller, P. H. et al. (2006). Gender Differences in High-school Students’ Views about Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363-381. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500690500277664
  23. Mim, S. A. (2015) ‘Can Women Science Teachers Be Role Models? Challenging Gender Stereotypes of Science and
  24. Masculinity’, MA thesis, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Hague, Netherlands. Accessed 12 June 2016 https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/33164/
  25. Nasr, A. R. & Soltani, A. (2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student’s Achievement. International Journal of Biology, 3(4), 100-104. Retrieved from http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijb/article/view/12442
  26. Osborne, J. et al. (2003). Attitude towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  27. Shapiro, J.R. & Williams, A.M. (2011). The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM, Feminist Forum: Sex Roles, 66,175-183. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/919688864?pq-origsite=gscholar
  28. Sonnert, G. & Holton, G. (1995). Who Succeeds in Science? New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press.
  29. Steinke, J. (1997). A Portrait of a Woman as a Scientist: Breaking Down Barriers Created by Gender-role Stereotypes, Public Understand Sci. 6, 409-428.
  30. Tai, R. H. & Sadler, P. M. (2011). Gender Differences in Introductory Undergraduate Physics Performance: University Physics Versus College Physics in The USA, International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1017-1037.
  31. TRIMUNC (2015). Educating Girls in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). The Triangle Model United Nations Conference for Middle School Students. Retrieved from http://trimunc.org/committeestopics/united-nations-childrens-fund/educating-girls-in-science-technologyengineering-and-math-stem/
  32. UNESCO. (2007). Science, Technology and Gender: An International Report. Science and Technology for Development Series, UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001540/154045e.pdf
  33. Walford, G. (1981). Tracking Down Sexism in Physics Textbooks. Physics Education, 16, 261-265. Retrieved from http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120/16/5/303
  34. Warrington, M. & Younger, M. (2000). The Other Side of the Gender Gap, Gender and Education, 12(4): 493-508.
  35. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09540250020004126
  36. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in Student Attitude toward Science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 387-398. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.3660320407/pdf
  37. Wickramasinghe, M. (2010). Feminist Research Methodology: Making meanings of meaning-making, London and New York: Routledge.
  38. Whitelegg, L. (2001). Girls in Science Education: of Rice and Fruit Trees. In M. Lederman & I. Bartsch (Eds.), The Gender and Science Reader (pp. 373-382). New York, Routledge.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.