Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

The Effects of Online Organic Chemistry Laboratory Videos on Students’ Perceptions and Intrinsic Motivation

Yujuan Liu 1 *
1 California State University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2021, pp. 239-255
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 917 DOWNLOADS: 733 Publication date: 15 Sep 2021
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this exploratory study is to investigate students’ use and perceptions of online videos and intrinsic motivation toward the online videos in an organic chemistry laboratory course, which used online videos to assist students’ preparation and learning in the lab. Students’ responses to an anonymous survey showed that they watched the online videos one or more times based on their available time. Descriptive statistics showed that students had positive perceptions about the effect of online videos in terms of their preparation of labs, understanding the concepts, doing hands-on activities, and other aspects in the lab, which were consistent with their written comments. 44% of students showed positive intrinsic motivation toward the online videos according to items based on self-determination theory. Correlation results showed that the effect subscales were strongly related to each other, and students’ intrinsic motivation was significantly and positively related to students’ perceived effect of the online videos on their understanding and preparation with medium to large effect sizes. Inferential tests showed that students who had a positive perception of intrinsic motivation scored significantly higher on the understanding subscale with a medium to large effect size. The findings in this study suggest the online organic chemistry laboratory videos have significant potential to improve students learning and it is important to stimulate student intrinsic motivation toward the online videos which will help students benefits more from the effects of the online videos.
KEYWORDS
Intrinsic motivation, Laboratory education, Organic chemistry laboratory, Online videos.
CITATION (APA)
Liu, Y. (2021). The Effects of Online Organic Chemistry Laboratory Videos on Students’ Perceptions and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrmste.435
REFERENCES
  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  2. Agustian, H. Y., & Seery, M. K. (2017). Reasserting the role of pre-laboratory activities in chemistry education: A proposed framework for their design. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 518-532. doi:10.1039/C7RP00140A
  3. Box, M. C., Dunnagan, C. L., Hirsh, L. A. S., Cherry, C. R., Christianson, K. A., Gibson, R. J., . . . Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2017). Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of three types of student-generated videos as instructional support in organic chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 164-170. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00451
  4. Bruck, L. B., Towns, M., & Bretz, S. L. (2010). Faculty perspectives of undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Goals and obstacles to success. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1416-1424. doi:10.1021/ed900002d
  5. Burrows, N. L., Nowak, M. K., & Mooring, S. R. (2017). Students’ perceptions of a project-based organic chemistry laboratory environment: A phenomenographic approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 811-824. doi:10.1039/C7RP00064B
  6. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008. doi:10.1037/a0035661
  7. Chaytor, J. L., Al Mughalaq, M., & Butler, H. (2017). Development and use of online prelaboratory activities in
  8. organic chemistry to improve students’ laboratory experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 859866. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00850
  9. Cohen, J., (1988), Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
  11. Elliott, M. J., Stewart, K. K., & Lagowski, J. J. (2008). The role of the laboratory in chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(1), 145-149. doi:10.1021/ed085p145
  12. Fung, F. M. (2015). Using first-person perspective filming techniques for a chemistry laboratory demonstration to facilitate a flipped pre-lab. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1518-1521. doi:10.1021/ed5009624
  13. Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2016). Video episodes and action cameras in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Eliciting student perceptions of meaningful learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 139-155. doi:10.1039/C5RP00196J
  14. Galloway, K. R., Malakpa, Z., & Bretz, S. L. (2016). Investigating affective experiences in the undergraduate
  15. chemistry laboratory: Students’ perceptions of control and responsibility. Journal of Chemical Education,
  16. 93(2), 227-238. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00737
  17. Gregory, S.-J., & Di Trapani, G. (2012). A blended learning approach to laboratory preparation. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 56−70.
  18. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 644653. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001
  19. Johnstone, A., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5(2), 42-51.
  20. Jolley, D. F., Wilson, S. R., Kelso, C., O’Brien, G., & Mason, C. E. (2016). Analytical thinking, analytical action: Using prelab video demonstrations and e-quizzes to improve undergraduate preparedness for analytical chemistry practical classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1855-1862. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00266
  21. Jordan, J. T., Box, M. C., Eguren, K. E., Parker, T. A., Saraldi-Gallardo, V. M., Wolfe, M. I., & Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2016). Effectiveness of student-generated video as a teaching tool for an instrumental technique in the organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 141-145. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00354
  22. Liu, Y. (2017). Investigating students’ basic needs and motivation in college chemistry courses with the lens of selfdetermination theory.
  23. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
  24. Mellefont, L. A., & Fei, J. (2016). Student perceptions of ‘flipped’ microbiology laboratory classes. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(1), 24-35.
  25. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  26. Nadelson, L. S., Scaggs, J., Sheffield, C., & McDougal, O. M. (2015). Integration of video-based demonstrations to prepare students for the organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 476-483. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9535-3
  27. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.
  28. Pogacnik, L., & Cigic, B. (2006). How to motivate students to study before they enter the lab. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(7), 1094. doi:10.1021/ed083p1094
  29. Pölloth, B., Schwarzer, S., & Zipse, H. (2020). Student individuality impacts use and benefits of an online video library for the organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 328-337.
  30. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00647
  31. Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172-185. doi:10.1039/B5RP90026C
  32. Richards-Babb, M., Curtis, R., Smith, V. J., & Xu, M. (2014). Problem solving videos for general chemistry review:
  33. Students’ perceptions and use patterns. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1796-1803. doi:10.1021/ed500280b
  34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
  35. Schmidt-McCormack, J. A., Muniz, M. N., Keuter, E. C., Shaw, S. K., & Cole, R. S. (2017). Design and implementation of instructional videos for upper-division undergraduate laboratory courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 749-762. doi:10.1039/C7RP00078B
  36. Stieff, M., Werner, S. M., Fink, B., & Meador, D. (2018). Online prelaboratory videos improve student performance in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(8), 1260-1266. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00109
  37. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A selfdetermination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
  38. Teo, T. W., Tan, K. C. D., Yan, Y. K., Teo, Y. C., & Yeo, L. W. (2014). How flip teaching supports undergraduate chemistry laboratory learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 550-567. doi:10.1039/C4RP00003J
  39. Vaino, K., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2012). Stimulating students' intrinsic motivation for learning chemistry through the use of context-based learning modules. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 410-
  40. 419. doi:10.1039/C2RP20045G
  41. Veiga, N., Luzardo, F., Irving, K., Rodríguez-Ayán, M. N., & Torres, J. (2019). Online pre-laboratory tools for firstyear undergraduate chemistry course in Uruguay: Student preferences and implications on student performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 229-245. doi:10.1039/C8RP00204E
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.