Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Science Education under a Totalitarian Theocracy:  Analyzing the ISIS Primary Curriculum

Patrice Potvin 1 * ,
Marianne Bissonnette 1,
Chirine Chamsine 1,
Marie-Hélène Bruyère 1,
Mohamed Amine Mahhou 1,
Olivier Arvisais 1,
Patrick Charland 1,
Stéphane Cyr 1,
Vivek Venkatesh 2
1 Université du Québec à Montréal 2 Concordia University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 2, Issue 3, September 2019, pp. 179-200
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 745 DOWNLOADS: 342 Publication date: 15 Oct 2019
ABSTRACT
We conducted an unprecedented analysis of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) primary school science curriculum. The research question focuses on the general scientific quality of the five documents examined, the integration of religious content and the possible tensions between science and religion that result from including such material in the corpus. This content analysis also focuses on the ideological/political agenda that supports its content and structure. Conclusions argue that the ISIS science curriculum appears to be committed to an  absolutist/theocratic ideological program that, among other things, promotes a very inadequate concept of scientific activity and content. Recommendations about secularization and the reconstruction of post -ISIS education systems are formulated.
KEYWORDS
Curriculum, Science, Religion, ISIS.
CITATION (APA)
Potvin, P., Bissonnette, M., Chamsine, C., Bruyère, M.-H., Mahhou, M. A., Arvisais, O., Charland, P., Cyr, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2019). Science Education under a Totalitarian Theocracy:  Analyzing the ISIS Primary Curriculum. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.233
REFERENCES
  1. al-Tamimi, A. (2015). The Evolution in Islamic State Administration. The Documentary Evidence. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4), 117-129.
  2. Aldahmash, A. H., Mansour, N. S., Alshamrani, S. M., & Almohi, S. (2016). An Analysis of Activities in Saudi Arabian Middle School Science Textbooks and Workbooks for the Inclusion of Essential Features of Inquiry. Research in science education, 46(6), 879-900. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9485-7
  3. Alters, B. J., & Alters, S. M. (2001). Defending Evolution. A Guide to the Creation/Evolution Controversy. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
  4. Anonymous. (2015a). Al-‘Ulûlm lil- šaff al-awwal al-ibtidâ’î, al-fašl al-dirâsî al-awwal [Sciences for the First Beginner Grade, the First Academic Semester], primary printing (n.l.: n.pub., 1437/2015).
  5. Anonymous. (2015b). Al-‘Ulûlm lil- šaff al-ḫâmis al-ibtidâ’î, al-fašl al-dirâsî al-awwal [Sciences for the Fifth Beginner Grade, the First Academic Semester], primary printing (n.l.: n.pub., 1437/2015).
  6. Anonymous. (2015c). Al-‘Ulûlm lil- šaff al-thânî al-ibtidâ’î, al-fašl al-dirâsî al-awwal [Sciences for the Second Beginner Grade], primary printing (n.l.: n.pub., 1437/2015).
  7. Anonymous. (2015d). Al-‘Ulûlm lil- šaff ar-râbi‘ al-ibtidâ’î, al-fašl al-dirâsî al-awwal [Sciences for the Fourth Beginner Grade, the First Academic Semester], primary printing (n.l.: n.pub., 1437/2015).
  8. Anonymous. (2015e). Al-‘Ulûlm lil- šaff ath-thâlith al-ibtidâ’î, al-fašl al-dirâsî al-awwal [Sciences for the Third Beginner Grade, the First Academic Semester], primary printing (n.l.: n.pub., 1437/2015).
  9. Arvisais, O., & Guidère, M. (2018a). The Doctrine of the Islamic State Through Its Textbooks. Manuscript sumbitted for publication.
  10. Arvisais, O., & Guidère, M. (2018b). Education in Conflict: How Islamic State Established Its Curriculum. Manuscript sumbitted for publication.
  11. Asghar, A., Hameed, S., & Farahani, N. K. (2014). Evolution in Biology Textbooks: A Comparative Analysis of 5
  12. Muslim Countries. Religion and Education, 41(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/15507394.2014.855081
  13. Astolfi, J.-P., Darot, É., Ginsburger-Vogel, Y., & Toussaint, J. (1997). Mots-clés de la didactique des sciences. Bruxelles: DeBoeck-Université.
  14. Bachelard, G. (1967). La formation de l'esprit scientifique. Paris: Librairie Vrin.
  15. Berman, E., & Shapiro, J. N. (2015). Why ISIL will fail on its own. Politico.
  16. Bloom, B. J. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals (1st ed.). Harlow, England: Longman Group.
  17. Boilevin, J.-M. (2005). Enseigner la physique par situation problème ou par problème ouvert. Aster, 40, 13-37.
  18. doi:10.4267/2042/8854
  19. Boorstin, D. J. (1983). The discoverers. New-York: Vintage Books.
  20. Boujaoude, S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D., & Alters, B. (2011). Biology Professors’ and Teachers’ Positions Regarding Biological Evolution and Evolution Education in a Middle Eastern Society.
  21. International Journal of Science Education, 33(7), 979-1000. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.489124
  22. Carr, P., & Thésée, G. (2009). Beyond the conflict of religion and science. Is there a place for an ethical epistemology in education? In M. Schleifer & V. Talwar (Eds.), Science and religion in education (pp. 245255). Calgary: Detseling Enterprises.
  23. Dagher, Z. R., & Boujaoude, S. (2011). Science education in Arab states: bright future or status quo? Studies in science education, 47(1), 73-101. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.549622
  24. Delhaye, C. (2014). Discours scientifique et discours religieux à propos de l'origine des espèces vivantes dans les manuels scolaires du secondaire en Grèce. [Scientific and Religious Discourses about the Origin of Living Species in Secondary School Textbooks in Greece]. Education et sociétés, 33(1), 47-62. doi:10.3917/es.033.0047
  25. Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2008). Teaching science for conceptual change: theory and practice. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of conceptual change (pp. 629-646). New-York: Routledge.
  26. El-Mestari, D. (2011). Le discours religieux des manuels scolaires algériens de l'éducation islamique dans le cycle secondaire. Tréma, 35-36, 70-80.
  27. Freidrich, C., & Brzeziński, Z. (1956). Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. New-York: Harper & Row.
  28. Guessoum, N. (2010). Islam's Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London / New-York: I.B. Tauris.
  29. Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2016). Manuels scolaires et ressources numériques: vers de nouvelles conceptualisations. Revista de Educação Matemática e Tecnológica Iberoamericana, 6(3).
  30. Guidère, M. (2017). L'État islamique en 100 questions. Paris: Talandier.
  31. Kwong, J. (1985). Changing Political Culture and Changing Curriculum: an analysis of language textbooks in the
  32. People's Republic of China. Comparative Education, 21(2), 197-208. doi:10.1080/0305006850210207
  33. Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1996). Is religious education compatible with science education? Science and Education, 5(2), 101-123. doi:10.1007/bf00428612
  34. Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ interpretations of Islamic culture related to science education versus the Islamic epistemology and ontology of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 127-140. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9214-5
  35. Olidort, J. (2016). Inside the Caliphate's classroom. Textbooks, guidance literature, and Indoctrination of the Islamic State. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/pubs/PolicyFocus147-Olidort-5.pdf
  36. Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now. The case of reason, science, humanism, and progress. New-York, Viking Press.
  37. Poincarré, H. (1902). La science et l'hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion.
  38. Popper, K. R. (1995). La logique de la découverte scientifique. Paris: Éditions Payot.
  39. Potvin, P., & Charland, P. (2009). The implications of two competing approaches to education and their consequences on the way to tackle science/religion issues in science classes. In M. Schleifer & V. Talwar (Eds.), Science and religion in education (pp. 227-243). Calgary: Detseling Enterprises.
  40. Reiss, M. J. (2007). Imagining the World: The Significance of Religious Worldviews for Science Education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Science, Worldviews and Education. Dordrecht: Srpinger.
  41. Russell, B. (1935). Religion and science. New-York: Oxford University Press.
  42. Sabra, A. I. (1987). The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement. History of Science, 25(3), 223-243. doi:10.1177/007327538702500301
  43. Shtulman, A., & Harrington, K. (2015). Tensions between science and intuition across the lifespan. Topics in cognitive science, 8(2016), 119-137. doi:10.1111/tops.12174
  44. Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2015). ISIS: The state of terror (Vol. 7). London, UK: William Collins.
  45. Strathern, P. (1997). Kant, je connais! Paris: Mallard Éditions.
  46. Talanquer, V. (2006). Commonsense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions.
  47. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(5), 811. doi:10.1021/ed083p811
  48. Taşkın, Ö. (2014). An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(4), 855-875. doi:10.1007/s11422-013-9553-0
  49. Thouin, M. (2006). Résoudre des problèmes scientifiques et technologiques au préscolaire et au primaire. Québec: Multimondes.
  50. Torrel, J.-P. (2015). Initiation à Saint Thomas d'Aquin: Éditions du Cerf.
  51. UNESCO. (2018). Revive the spirit of Mosul. Retrieved on december 17 (2018) from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/10_spt_18_int_conf_mosul_concept_note_en.pdf
  52. Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
  53. Vosniadou, S. (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York: Routledge.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.