Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Microaggression Experiences of Queer Science Students in Their Departments

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 5, Issue 2, May 2022, pp. 131-153
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 1295 DOWNLOADS: 776 Publication date: 15 May 2022
ABSTRACT
This study explored how the feelings of comfort and safety of LGBTQ+ undergraduate science majors in their departments at a mid-size Midwestern university affected their academic success. The literature provides a number of studies about LGBTQ+ STEM faculty, campus and departmental climate studies for LGBTQ+ students, and microaggressions experienced by a variety of students and faculty from historically underrepresented groups. There is little literature directly connecting campus climate work to STEM departments’ climates and the experiences of LGBTQ+ undergraduates. This study utilized a qualitative approach to explore the experiences of STEM majors who identified as LGBTQ+. A narrative approach to the research emphasized the voices of these marginalized students. Three participants participated in one interview per semester over two subsequent semesters for a total of six interviews, which were then coded using emergent themes. The most interesting findings were related to potential microaggressions experienced by the students, such as specific passive negative experiences or general negative feelings about expressing their identities. This study found that LGBTQ+ undergraduates in science departments may experience microaggressions because of their sexual orientation but may lack the language to describe these situations in detail or identify them as harmful. Thus, there is a need to examine and potentially improve science students’ language tools to better identify and describe these experiences.
KEYWORDS
LGBTQ+, Undergraduate students, Queer in STEM, Microaggressions
CITATION (APA)
Fitzgerald-Russell, M. L., & Grunert Kowalske, M. (2022). Microaggression Experiences of Queer Science Students in Their Departments. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.522
REFERENCES
  1. Ackerman, N., Atherton, T. J., Deconinck, W., Falk, M. L., Garmon, S., Henry, E., & Long, E. (2012, February 28). Gender and sexual diversity issues in physics: The audience speaks [Conference session]. American Physical Society March Meeting 2012, Boston. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.4112.pdf
  2. Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1644-1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476048
  3. Atherton, T. J., Barthelemy, R. S., Deconinck, W., Falk, M. L., Garmon, S., Long, E., Plisch, M., Simmons, E. H., & Reeves, K. (2016). LGBT climate in physics: Building an inclusive community. American Physical Society. Retrieved from http://www.aps.org/programs/lgbt/
  4. Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353
  5. Bilimoria, D., & Stewart, A. J. (2009). “Don’t ask, don’t tell”: The academic climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender faculty in science and engineering. NWSA Journal, 21(2), 85–103. Retrieved from https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/316151
  6. Blumenfeld, W. J. (2012). LGBTQ campus climate: The good and the still very bad. Diversity and Democracy 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/lgbtq-campus-climate-good-and-still-very-bad
  7. Bowling, J., Miller, R. A., & Mather, N. (2020). Making campus-based LGBTQ climate assessments matter. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 57(2), 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2019.1631837
  8. Brim, M., & Ghaziani, A. (2016). Introduction: Queer methods. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44(3&4), 14-27. DOI: 10.1353/wsq.2016.0033
  9. Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (2016). Queer methods and methodologies: An introduction. In Browne, K., & Nash, C. J. (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies (pp. 1-23). Routledge.
  10. Byars-Winston, A. M., Branchaw, J., Pfund, C., Leverett, P., & Newton, J. (2015). Culturally diverse undergraduate researchers‘ academic outcomes and perceptions of their research mentoring relationships. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2533-2554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1085133
  11. Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065
  12. Chen, S., Binning, K. R., Manke, K. J., Brady, S. T., McGreevy, E. M., Betancur, L., Limeri, L. B., & Kaufmann, N. (2021). Am I a science person? A strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220936480
  13. Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields: Statistical analysis report. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf
  14. Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(37), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074
  15. Couillard, E., & Higbee, J. L. (2018). Expanding the scope of universal design: Implications for gender identity and sexual orientation. Education Sciences 8(3), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030147
  16. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(3), 1241-1299. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
  17. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276484027003008
  18. Dancy, M., Rainey, K., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R., & Moller, S. (2020). Undergraduates’ awareness of White and male privilege in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(52), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00250-3
  19. Dessel, A. B., Goodman, K. D., & Woodford, M. R. (2017). LGBT discrimination on campus and heterosexual bystanders: Understanding intentions to intervene. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(2), 101-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000015
  20. di Bartolo, A. N. (2013). Is there a difference?: The impact of campus climate on sexual minority and gender minority students’ levels of outness. (Publication No. 3558991) [Doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate University.] ProQuest. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1353095851?parentSessionId=LasNwzF7xuWXq8pCHI4Q7ct6Nu9C%2FMwohVimgxo0LEA%3D
  21. Duran, A., Pope, R. L., & Jones, S. R. (2020). The necessity of intersectionality as a framework to explore queer and trans student retention. Journal of College Student Retention, 21(4), 520-543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119895510
  22. Eren, E. (2021). Exploring science identity development of women in physics and physical sciences in higher education: A case study from Ireland. Science & Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00220-3
  23. Fauria, R. M., & Zellner, L. J. (2015). College students speak success. Journnal of Adult Development, 22(2), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9203-0
  24. Forbes, T. D. (2020). Queer-free majors?: LGBTQ+ college students’ account of chilly and warm academic disciplines. Journal of LGBT Youth, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2020.1813673
  25. Friedensen, R. E., Kimball, E., Vaccaro, A., Miller, R. A., & Forester, R. (2021). Queer science: Temporality and futurity for queer students in STEM. Time & Society, 30(3), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X211008138
  26. Garvey, J. C., Taylor, J. L., & Rankin, S. (2015). An examination of campus climate for LGBTQ community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39(6), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2013.861374
  27. Gonsalves, A. J., Cavalcante, A. S., Sprowls, E. D., & Iacono, H. (2021). “Anybody can do science if they’re brave enough:” Understanding the role of science capital in science majors’ identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21695
  28. Graham, B. E. (2019). Queerly unequal: LGBT+ students and mentoring in higher education. MDPI Social Sciences, 8(171), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8060171
  29. Green, A. E., Price-Feeney, N., & Dorison, S. H. (2019). National estimate of LGBTQ youth seriously considering suicide. New York, New York: The Trevor Project. Retrieved from https://www.thetrevorproject.org/trvr_press/national-estimate-of-lgbtq-youth-seriously-considering-suicide/
  30. Gunckel, K. L. (2009). Queering science for all: Probing queer theory in science education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 25(2), 62-75. Retrieved from https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/GUNQU
  31. Harding, S. (2004). Introduction. In Harding, S. (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
  32. Hughes, B. E. (2017). “Managing by not managing:” How gay engineering students manage sexual orientation identity. Journal of College Student Development, 58(3), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017/0029
  33. Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), 1-5. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
  34. Jennings, M., Roscoe, R., Kellam, N., & Jayasuriya, S. (2020, January). A review of the state of LGBTQIA+ student research in STEM and engineering education. In ASEE annual conference. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10157897
  35. Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046
  36. Lange, A. C., Duran, A., & Jackson, R. (2019). The state of LGBT and queer research in higher education revisited: Current academic houses and future possibilities. Journal of College Student Development, 60(5), 511-526. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0047
  37. Le, P. T., Doughty, L., Thompson, A. N., & Hartley, L. M. (2019). Investigating undergraduate biology students’ science identity production. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(50), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0204
  38. Linley, J. L., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2018). Examining the ecological systems of LGBTQ STEM majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 24(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017018836
  39. Loren Hill, R., Nguyen, D. J., Kilgo, C. A., Lange, A. L., Shea, H. D., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2020). How LGBTQ+ students thrive in college. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2020.1738241
  40. Mattheis, A., Arellano, D. C. D., & Yoder, J. B. (2019). A model of queer STEM identity in the workplace. Journal of Homosexuality, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2019.1610632
  41. McCann, H. (2016). Epistemology of the subject: Queer theory’s challenge to feminist sociology. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44(3&4), 224-243. http://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2016.0044
  42. McCann, H., & Monaghan, W. (2020). Queer theory now: From foundations to futures. Red Globe Press.
  43. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
  44. Miller, R. A., Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E. W., & Forester, R. (2021). “It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal for Diversity in Higher Education, 14(3), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000171
  45. Mulcahy, M., Dalton, S., Kolbert, J., & Crothers, L. (2016). Informal mentoring for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students. Journal of Educational Research, 109(4), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979907
  46. Nadal, K. L. (2016). The intersection of queer theory and empirical methods: Visions for CLAGS, the Center for LGBTQ Studies. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44(3&4), 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2016.0060
  47. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/etc/nsb1401.pdf
  48. Olcott, A. N.,Downen, M. R. (2020). The challenges of fieldwork for LGBTQ+ geoscientists. Eos, 101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EO148200
  49. Ost, B. (2010). The role of peers and grades in determining major persistence in the sciences. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011
  50. Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors impacting the academic climate for LGBQ STEM faculty. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007429
  51. Pecher, L. (2019, November 5). Equilibrating equality: The current situation for LGBTQ scientists. ChemistryViews. 10.1002/chemv.201900097
  52. Pitcher, E. N., Camacho, T. P., Renn, K. A., & Woodford, M. R. (2016). Affirming policies, programs, and supportive services: College student success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000048
  53. Rania, N., Siri, A., Bagnasco, A., Aleo, G., & Sasso, L. (2014). Academic climate, well-being and academic performance in a university degree course. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(6), 751-760. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01471.x
  54. Rankin, S. R. (2004). Campus climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. The Diversity Factor 12(1), 18-23. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.library.wmich.edu/docview/213964464/fulltextPDF/8516D04516DD434DPQ/1?accountid=15099
  55. Renn, K. A. (2010). LGBT and queer research in higher education: The state and status of the field. Educational Researcher 39(2), 132-141. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27764565
  56. Renn, K. (2017). LGBTQ students on campus: Issues and opportunities for higher education leaders. Higher Education Today. Retrieved from https://www.higheredtoday.org/2017/04/10/lgbtq-students-higher-education/
  57. Rodriguez, S. L., Cunningham, K., & Jordan, A. (2017). What a scientist looks like: How community colleges can utilize and enhance science identity development as a means to improve success for women of color. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(4-5), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1251354
  58. Roffee, J. A., & Waling, A. (2016). Rethinking microaggressions and anti-social behavior against LGBTIQ+ youth. Safer Communities, 15(4), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-02-2016-0004
  59. Sadika, B., Wiebe, E., Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2020). Intersectional microaggressions and social support for LGBTQ persons of color: A systematic review of the Canadian-based empirical literature. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 16(2), 111-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2020.1724125
  60. Schilt, K., Meadow, T., & Compton, D. (2018). Introduction: Queer work in a straight discipline. In Compton, D., Meadow, T., & Schilt, K. (Eds.), Other, please specify: Queer methods in sociology (pp. 1-34). University of California Press.
  61. Seelman, K. L., Woodford, M. R., & Nicolazzo, Z. (2017). Victimization and microaggressions targeting LGBTQ college students: Gender identity as a moderator of psychological distress. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 26(1-2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2016.1263816
  62. Snapp, S. D., Burdge, H., Licona, A. C., Moody, R. L., & Russell, S. T. (2015). Students’ perspectives on LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1025614
  63. Stachl, C. N., Hartman, E. C., Wemmer, D. E., & Francis, M. B. (2019). Grassroots efforts to quantify and improve the academic climate of an R1 STEM department: Using evidence-based discussions to foster community. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 2149-2157. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00163
  64. Stout, J. G., & Wright, H. M. (2016). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students’ sense of belonging in computing: An intersectional approach. Computing in Science and Engineering, 18(3), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2016.45
  65. Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  66. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A. M. B., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271-286. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.271
  67. Suppes, A., Napier, J. L., & van der Toorn, J. (2019). The pallative effects of system justification on the health and happiness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218785156
  68. Tetreault, P. A., Fette, R., Meidlinger, P. C., & Hope, D. (2013). Perceptions of campus climate by sexual minorities. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(7), 947-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.774874
  69. The Trevor Project. (n.d.). Resource center. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/resources/
  70. Theobald, E. J., Eddy, S. L., Grunspan, D. Z., Wiggins, B. L., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter. PLoS One, 12(7), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181336
  71. Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114
  72. Vaccaro, A. (2012). Campus microclimates for LGBT faculty, staff, and students: An exploration of the intersections of social identity and campus roles. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1515/jsarp-2012-6473
  73. Vaccaro, A., Miller, R. A., Kimball, E. W., Forester, R., & Friedensen, R. (2021). Historicizing minoritized identities of sexuality and gender in STEM fields: A grounded theory model. Journal of College Student Development, 62(3), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0026
  74. Voigt, M. K. (2020). Queer-spectrum student experiences and resources in undergraduate mathematics. [Doctoral dissertation, UC San Diego.] ProQuest. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7g54x6c7
  75. Woodford, M. R., Chonody, J. M., Kulick, A., Brennan, D. J., & Renn, K. (2015). The LGBQ microaggressions on campus scale: A scale development and validation study. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(12), 1660-1687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078205
  76. Woodford, M. R., Han, Y., Craig, S., Lim, C., & Matney, M. M. (2014). Discrimination and mental health among sexual minority college students: The type and form of discrimination does matter. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 18(2), 142-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2013.833882
  77. Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., & Atteberry, B. (2015). Protective factors, campus climate, and health outcomes among sexual minority college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(2), 73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038552
  78. Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., Garvey, J. C., Sinco, B. R., & Hong, J. S. (2018). LGBTQ policies and resources on campus and the experiences and psychological well-being of sexual minority college students: Advancing research on structural inclusion. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000289
  79. Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., Sinco, B. R., & Hong, J. S. (2014). Contemporary heterosexism on campus and psychological distress among LGBQ students: The mediating role of self-acceptance. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(5), 519-529. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ort0000015
  80. Woodford, M. R., Weber, G., Nicolazzo, Z., Hunt, R., Kulick, A., Coleman, T., Coulombe, S., & Renn, K. A. (2018). Depression and attempted suicide among LGBTQ college students: Fostering resilience to the effects of heterosexism and cisgenderism on campus. Journal of College Student Development, 59(4), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0040
  81. Yoder, J. B., & Mattheis, A. (2016). Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(1), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632
  82. Yost, M. R., & Gilmore, S. (2011). Assessing LGBTQ campus climate and creating change. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(9), 1330-1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.605744
LICENSE
Creative Commons License