Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Evaluating the Influence of Instructional Approaches on the Mathematical Achievement of Immigrant Students

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 7, Issue SI, June 2024, pp. 195-210
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 388 DOWNLOADS: 206 Publication date: 15 Jun 2024
ABSTRACT
As a teacher, my experiences revealed that although most Iranian new immigrant high school students had an excellent mathematical background, they faced difficulties in learning math after relocating to a school in Vancouver, BC. There are several reasons for this, and this article focuses on one of those. I conducted two series of interviews with seven Iranian new immigrant high school students to collect data. They studied in a Canadian school and had also learned math in an Iranian high school. Participants pointed to different math teachers' methods as a reason why learning math in Canada differs from Iran. Canadian math teachers give students the authority to decide on how and when to finish their math work. These students are not familiar with this authority, and they do not know how to plan for their math education. They need support as they learn how to make decisions and be more autonomous.
KEYWORDS
Mathematics Education, Immigrant Students, Pedagogical Approaches, Iranian Student
CITATION (APA)
Manzouri, M. (2024). Evaluating the Influence of Instructional Approaches on the Mathematical Achievement of Immigrant Students. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(SI), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.319SI
REFERENCES
  1. Ahmadi, F., Darvishpour, M., & Palm, I. (2020). Changes regarding attitudes towards ethnic and cultural diversity in Sweden: The diversity barometer (2005-2018). International Journal of Social Science Studies, 8(5), 1–16.
  2. Akhter, N., Akhtar, M., & Abaidullah, M. (2015). The perceptions of high school mathematics problem solving teaching methods in mathematics education. Bulletin of Education & Research, 37(1), 1–24.
  3. Al-haddia, A., & King, D. (2020). School integration of newly arrived immigrant children and youth [Bachelor Thesis, University of Gavle]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-32702
  4. Antony-Newman, M. (2019). Parental involvement of eastern European immigrant parents in Canada: Whose involvement has capital? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1668748
  5. Arab, S., Ziaei, T., Behnampour, N., & Khoori, E. (2019). “Konkoor Giant”, a narrative of high school female students from Gorgan, Iran. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0057
  6. Arani, M. R. S. (2015). Cross cultural analysis of an Iranian mathematics lesson. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-07-2014-0017
  7. Atef, A. A. (2021). Leading work-based learning programs: How administrators and teachers support learning for exceptional female immigrant high school students- a case study [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566314237/abstract/99E73F4EE54E40A4PQ/1
  8. Bengtsson, M. (2012). Mathematics and multilingualism—Where immigrant pupils succeed. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(4), 17–23.
  9. Binhas, A., & Yaknich, L. (2019). You have to start from scratch, and you need someone by your side: Perspectives of parents and teachers on immigrant students’ adaptation to school. International Migration, 57(5), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12608
  10. Bishop, A. J. (1994). Cultural conflicts in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 15–18.
  11. Bodovski, K., Munoz, I., Byun, S., & Chykina, V. (2020). Do education system characteristics moderate the socioeconomic, gender and immigrant gaps in math and science achievement? International Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2), 122–154. https://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2020.4807
  12. Borji, V., & Sánchez, A. (2019). An exploratory analysis of the representations of functions in the university entrance exam in Spain and Iran. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311874
  13. Casper, A. M. A., Atadero, R. A., & Fuselier, L. C. (2022). Revealing the queer-spectrum in STEM through robust demographic data collection in undergraduate engineering and computer science courses at four institutions. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0264267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264267
  14. Celedón-Pattichis, S., LópezLeiva, C. A., Pattichis, M. S., & Civil, M. (2022). Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Computing in Multilingual Contexts. Teachers College Record, 124(5), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221103929
  15. Cheney, G. (2005). Canadian education report. National Center on Education and the Economy. https://www.ncee.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Canadian-Education-Report.pdf
  16. Civil, M. (2012). Mathematics teaching and learning of immigrant students. In O. Skovsmose, O. Skovsmose, & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the Cage: Critique and Politics of Mathematics Education (pp. 127–142). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-808-7_6
  17. Copeland Solas, E., & Kamalodeen, V. (2022). Culturally Relevant Pedagogies (CRP) and Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) in science education: Black success stories in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00236-z
  18. Creighton, T. B. (2018). Digital natives, digital immigrants, digital learners: An international empirical integrative review of the literature. ICPEL Education Leadership Review, 19(1).
  19. Cunha, J., Rosário, P., Macedo, L., Nunes, A. R., Fuentes, S., Pinto, R., & Suárez, N. (2015). Parents’ conceptions of their homework involvement in elementary school. Psicothema, 27(2), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2014.210
  20. Cypress, B. (2018). Qualitative research methods: A phenomenological focus. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing: DCCN, 37(6), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000322
  21. de Araujo, Z., Roberts, S., Willey, C., & William, Z. (2018). English learners in K–12 mathematics education: A review of the literature. 88(6), 879–919. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318798093
  22. Ellis, M. W., & Berry III, R. Q. (2005). The paradigm shift in mathematics education: Explanations and implications of reforming conceptions of teaching and learning. The Mathematics Educator, 15(1).
  23. Farrokhi-Khajeh-Pasha, Y., Nedjat, S., Mohammadi, A., Rad, E. M., Majdzadeh, R., Monajemi, F., Jamali, E., & Yazdani, S. (2012). The validity of Iran’s national university entrance examination (Konkoor) for predicting medical students’ academic performance. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-60
  24. Fritzlan, A. (2021). Attending to relationship: A narrative inquiry into teachers’ experiences with community and place in mathematics education [University of British Columbia]. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0404423
  25. Gallistel, C. R. (2005). Deconstructing the law of effect. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.012
  26. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003
  27. James, C. E., & Howard, P. S. S. (2021). The education system of Canada: Multiculturalism, multicultural education, and racialized students in Canada. In S. Jornitz & M. Parreira do Amaral (Eds.), The education systems of the Americas (pp. 313–326). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41651-5_44
  28. Keshvari, M., Soleimanpour Omran, M., & Ismaili Shad, B. (2022). Designing a theoretical framework for safe schools in Iranian education: A qualitative research. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Adminstration, 13(2), 16–30.
  29. Kiamanesh, A. (2004). Factors affecting Iranian students’ achievement in mathematics. International Research Conference, 1, 1–11.
  30. Kotsopoulos, D., Lee, J., & Heide, D. (2011). A pair-wise analysis of the cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks used during classroom instruction and those assigned for homework. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(4), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.624819
  31. Leung, F. K. S. (2021). Jewish culture, Chinese culture, and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10034-3
  32. Levels, M., & Dronkers, J. (2008). Educational performance of native and immigrant children from various countries of origin. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8), 1404–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701682238
  33. Lock, C. L., & Lee, M. W. (2001). Teaching mathematics: What teachers say, believe, and do. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150109556472
  34. Marks, G. N. (2005). Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(5), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870500158943
  35. Martin, A. J., Liem, G. A. D., Mok, M. M. C., & Xu, J. (2012). Problem solving and immigrant student mathematics and science achievement: Multination findings from the programme for international student assessment (PISA). Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1054–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029152
  36. Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3–5.
  37. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2017). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical sontext of multicultural education (7th edition). Pearson.
  38. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (Second). Sage Publications, Inc.
  39. Reyes, L. H., & Stanic, G. M. A. (1988). Race, sex, socioeconomic status, and mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/749109
  40. Riordain, M. N., & O’Donoghue, J. (2009). The relationship between performances on mathematical word problems and language proficiency for students learning through the medium of Irish. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9158-9
  41. Sayers, J., Petersson, J., Marschall, G., & Andrews, P. (2022). Teachers’ perspectives on homework: Manifestations of culturally situated common sense. Educational Review, 74(5), 905–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1806786
  42. Seidman, I. (2015). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences, 4th ed. (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  43. Svensson, P., Meaney, T., & Noren, E. (2014). Immigrant students’ perceptions of their possibilities to learn mathematics: The case of homework. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(3), 32–37.
  44. Takeuchi, M. A. (2018). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9781-4
  45. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.89
  46. van Manen, M. (2017). But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699570
  47. Vilenius‐Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701708228
  48. Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2016). Modeling students’ interest in mathematics homework. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.928252
  49. Yaro, K. (2021). Understanding African immigrant families’ support for their children’s mathematics learning in Canada [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0401843
LICENSE
Creative Commons License