Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

An Investigation of Success Factors in a High School Algebra Intervention Program

Sherrie Wisdom 1 * ,
Sherri Kulpa 1
1 Lindenwood University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2021, pp. 205-224
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 794 DOWNLOADS: 591 Publication date: 15 Sep 2021
ABSTRACT
This quantitative study allowed investigation of a high school Algebra intervention program through examination of potential relationships among teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning, teachers’ instructional styles, students’ academic self-concept in mathematics, and students’ mathematics achievement. Existing research focused on individual components used in this study on the elementary level; thus, leaving a gap in understanding of how factors related to the success of high school students. Results may provide information to teachers and administrators regarding relationships among factors shown to impact student achievement in mathematics, and provide evaluation of an Algebra intervention program at the secondary level. The researcher utilized the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Teaching and Learning Beliefs Questionnaire to identify beliefs about teaching and learning mathematics and the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) to determine how closely instruction in Algebra classrooms aligned with constructivist practices. Students were given the Academic Self-Description Questionnaire II (ASDQII) as preand-post measures of academic self-concept in relation to mathematics; then, data were checked for relationships to achievement, measured by common semester final exams. Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient analysis determined significant relationships existed between RTOP scores and the ASDQII prompts: I am hopeless when it comes to mathematics; work in mathematics is easy for me; and I get good marks in mathematics classes. Significant relationships were defined between Teaching Style and both Productive and Unproductive Teacher Beliefs, as well as between students’ academic self-concept in mathematics and overall mastery of Algebra content, measured by scores on common semester finals.
KEYWORDS
Algebra, Beliefs, Constructivist, High school, Intervention, Self-concept.
CITATION (APA)
Wisdom, S., & Kulpa, S. (2021). An Investigation of Success Factors in a High School Algebra Intervention Program. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.433
REFERENCES
  1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Dictionary of Psychology [website]. https://dictionary.apa.org/hawthorne-effect
  2. Boston, M., Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., & Sherman, M. (2015, March). A comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(2), 154-175.
  3. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5951/mathteaceduc.3.2.0154
  4. Burdman, P. (2018). The mathematics of opportunity: Rethinking the role of math in educational equity [Report]. Just Equations: https://justequations.org/
  5. Burnett, P. C., Craven, R. G., & Marsh, H, W. (1999). Enhancing students' self-concepts and related constructs: A critical longitudinal analysis capitalising on and combining promising enhancement techniques for educational settings. In AARE NZARE Conference 1999. Australia, Victoria, Melbourne.
  6. http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/bur99425.htm
  7. Cirino, P., Toler, T. D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018, May 29). Longitudinal algebra prediction for early versus later takers.
  8. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 179-191. http://dx.doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1486279 Classroom Observation Project. (2018). [website]. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/certop/calculation.html
  9. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2015, January 1). The aftermath of accelerating algebra: Evidence from district policy initiatives. Journal of Human Resources, 50, 159-188.
  10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.1.159
  11. Cortez, K., Goodman, J., & Nomi, T. (2013). Doubling up: Intensive math instruction and educational attainment.
  12. Paper presented at the SREE Spring Conference, Washington D.C.
  13. https://www.sree.org/conferences/2013s/
  14. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2013, February 5). Implementing RTI in high school: A case study. Journal of Learning
  15. Disabilities, 46(2), 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219411407923
  16. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2018). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.).
  17. McGraw Hill.
  18. Laerd (2018). Statistics [website]. https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/pearson-correlation-coefficientstatistical-guide.php
  19. Liem, G. A., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). Academic self-concepts in ability streams: Considering domain specificity and same-stream peers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(1), 83-109.
  20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/00220973.2013.876227
  21. Loveless, T. (2013). The algebra imperative: Assessing algebra in a national and international context. Brookings Institution Center on Education Policy.
  22. Marsh, H. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The March/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623-636.
  23. http://www.grajfoner.com/Clanki/Marsh1990JoEP%20Academic%20Self%20Concept.pdf%20%20
  24. Marsh, H., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 59-77.
  25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501
  26. McEachin, A., Domina, T., & Penner, A. (2017). Understanding the effects of middle school algebra: A regression discontinuity approach. Rand Corporation: https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1209.html Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (n.d.). [website].
  27. https://apps.dese.mo.gov/MCDS/home.aspx
  28. Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International results in mathematics grade
  29. 8. TIMSS and PIRLS: http://timss2015.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-InternationalResults-in-Mathematics-Grade-8.pdf
  30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (n.d.). [website]. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-
  31. Positions/Principles-and-Standards/Principles,-Standards,-and-Expectations/
  32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
  33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  34. Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014, November). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic selfconcepts and achievements within and across domains: Replacing and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170-1191.
  35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036307
  36. Office of Economic and Cooperative Development. (2018a). PISA 2015: Results in focus [brochure]. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
  37. Office of Economic and Cooperative Development. (2018b). [website]. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
  38. Pena, K. L., Mujica, A. D., Navarrete, C. B., & Perez-Villalobos, M. V. (2015). Construction and psychometric characteristics of the self-concept scale of interaction in the classroom. Psicothema, 27(2), 151-158. http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.7334/psicothema2014.224
  39. Pepin, B., Xu, B., Trouche, L., & Wang, C. (2017). Developing a deeper understanding of mathematics teaching
  40. expertise: An examination of three Chinese mathematics teachers’ resource systems as windows into their work and expertise. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649016-9727-2
  41. Piburn, M., & Sawada, D. (n.d.). Reformed teacher observation protocol (RTOP): Reference manual. ASU
  42. Modeling Instruction & MNS Degree Programs: http://modeling.asu.edu/
  43. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., & Falconer, K. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics,
  44. 102(6), 245-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
  45. Stein, M. K., Kaufman, J. H., Sherman, M., & Hillen, A. F. (2011). Algebra: A challenge at the crossroads of policy and practice. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 453-492.
  46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423025
  47. The Nation’s Report Card. (2016). [website]. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2017_highlights/
  48. Tidd, S. T., Stoelinga, T. M. Bush-Richards, A. M.,De Sena, D. L., & Dwyer, T. J. (2018). An intensification approach to double-block algebra: A pilot implementation of intensified algebra in a large urban school district. Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 95-107. ERIC - EJ1161560.
  49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2016.1209454
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.