Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

An Indonesian Translation and Adaptation of the POSTT: A Science Teacher Pedagogical Orientation, Formative Assessment Device

Listiani Listiani 1 * ,
William W. Cobern 2,
Brandy A. Pleasants 2
1 Borneo University Tarakan2 Western Michigan University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 2, Issue 3, September 2019, pp. 135-148
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 641 DOWNLOADS: 424 Publication date: 15 Sep 2019
ABSTRACT
Indonesia has experienced problems in teacher quality, especially science teachers. Teacher-training programs in which preservice teachers are taught to use the most appropriate science teaching methods are critical in order to prepare qualified teachers. Having a formative way to assess and discuss preservice science teachers’  preferred teaching orientations is important. Therefore, the Pedagogy of Science Teaching Test (POSTT) was translated and adapted into Bahasa as a formative assessment for preservicein the translation and validation of a selected set of POSTT items into Bahasa (Indonesian language) involving  science teachers. There were eight steps Indonesian language experts and science content experts. Pilot study data indicates that the transadapted items are both reliable and valid for use with Indonesian teachers, and that the transadapted POSTT items are understandable and adequately fit with Indonesian school culture. This being the case, science educators in other countries may also wish to employ transadapted POSTT items for preservice science teacher education purposes
KEYWORDS
Formative assessment, pedagogical orientations, preservice science teachers, transadaptation
CITATION (APA)
Listiani, L., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A. (2019). An Indonesian Translation and Adaptation of the POSTT: A Science Teacher Pedagogical Orientation, Formative Assessment Device. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(3), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.231
REFERENCES
  1. Anggraeni, S., Aryani, A., Hamidiyanti, Y., Sanjaya, Y., & Hernawati. (2009). Sudahkan Calon Guru Biologi
  2. Menerapkan Hakekat Sains dalam Pembelajaran Biologi? [Have the Preservice Biology Teachers
  3. Implementing the Nature of Science in Teaching Biology?] in Kismiantini, D. Darmawan, E. Priyambodo, A.
  4. Wijaya, and S. Nurohman (Ed.), Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA (Vol. 4, B340-B348). Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  5. Azhar (2011). Paradigma meningkatkan mutu pendidikan pada LPTK [Paradigm on improving education quality for teacher training institutions]. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED, 8(1), 73-86.
  6. Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J.GessNewsome and N.G. Lederman (Ed.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (Vol VI, pp. 147-161). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  7. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (2008). Assessment for learning formative assessment. In OECD (Ed.), Proceedings of OECD/CERI International Conference: Learning in the 21st century: Research, Innovation and policy. Paris: Organization for Economic co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf.
  8. Caroline, K. & Wahyuni N.C. (2013, December 6). Back to school for education policy makers. The Jakarta Globe. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/back-to-school-for-education-policy-makers/.
  9. Cobern, W.W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Skjold, B.A., Mugaloglu, E.Z., Bentz, A., & Sparks, K. (2014). Pedagogy of science teaching test: Formative assessments of science teaching orientations. International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.918672.
  10. Cohen, Y., Gafni, N. & Hanani, P. (2007, September). Translating and adapting a test, yet another source of variance; the standard error of translation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the IAEA. Baku, Azerbaijan. Retrieved from http://www.erc.metu.edu/me nu/series04/0417.pdf
  11. Czerniak, C.M. & Schriver, M.L. (1994). An examination of preservice science teachers’ beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614577
  12. Driel, J.H.V & Berry, A. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, M. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Education (Third ed., pp. 656-661). Oxford: Elsevier.
  13. Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., et al. (2014). Global
  14. patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581– 603. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6.
  15. Taber, K.S. (2016). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 46(6), 1273–1296. https://10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  16. The Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2008). The path to quality teaching in higher education. Paris, Perancis: Henard, F. & Leprince-Ringuet
  17. Hightower, A.M., Delgado, R.C., Llyold, S.C., Wittenstein, R., Sellers, K., & Swanson, C.B. (2011). Improving student learning by supporting quality teaching: Key issues, effectiveness strategies. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education
  18. Human Service Research Institute (2005). Tolkit on translating and adapting instruments. Cambridge, MA: Chavez, L.M. & Canino, G.
  19. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, source, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome and N.G. Lederman (Ed.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 95-132). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher
  20. Meirina, Z. (2013, July 5). Kemdikbud akan tata keberadaan LPTK. ANTARA [Ministry of Education will manage the
  21. Teacher Training Institutions/LPTK]. Retrieved from http://www.antaranews.com/berita/383510/kemdikbud-akan-tata-keberadaan-lptk.
  22. Montoya, A., Llopis, N., & Gilaberte, I. (2011). Validation of the translation of an instrument to measure reliability
  23. of written information on treatment choices: A study on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Education for Health, Vol. 24(3), 577. http://www.educationforhealth.net
  24. Morine-Deshimer, G. & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature and sources of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In Julie Gess-Newsome & Norman G. Lederman, Examining pedagogical content knowledge. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 21-49). Springer Netherlands.
  25. Muslim, Suhandi, A., & Karniawati, I. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi Kemampuan Berargumen dan Pemahaman Konsep Calon Guru Fisika [Developing a Model for Teaching Physics with Argumentation and Conceptual Understanding of Physics Teacher Oriented], In A. Purqon, F.D.E. Latief, S. Viridi, S. Pramuditya, and D. Enan (Ed.), Proceedings of SNIPS 2013: Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains. (Vol. 1. pp.154-158). Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.
  26. Rebell, M. A., & Hunter, M. A. (2004). ‘Highly Qualified’ Teachers: Pretense or Legal Requirement?. Phi Delta Kappa, 85(9), 690-696. https://10.1177/003172170408500910
  27. United State Agency for International Development (2013). Teacher education and professional development in Indonesia: A gap analysis. Indonesia: Evans, D., Tate, S., Navarro, R., and Nicolls, M
  28. Smith, D.C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome and N. G. Lederman (Ed.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 163-198). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  29. Sousa, V. D. & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2010). Translation, adaptation, and validation of instruments or scales for use in
  30. cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17. (2), 268-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  31. Sumintono, B., Said, H., & Mislan, N. (2012). Constraints and improvement: A case study of the Indonesia’s international standard school in improving its capacity building. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 22-31. https://: 10.11591/edulearn.v6i1.187
  32. Sugiarti, A. (2012). The Development of Achievable and Quality Education. Proceedings of ISQAE 2012: In Djaali, M.R. Luddin, S. Siraj, M.B. Ali, Y. Supriyati, Emzir, W.Rahayu, Y. Sastrawijaya, and E. Boeriswati (Ed.), The 1st International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education. (Vol. 1. pp. 75-96). Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
  33. Thair, M. & Treagust, D. F (1999). A review of teacher development reforms in Indonesian secondary science: The effectiveness of practical working in biology. Research in Education, Vol. 27(4), 581-597.
  34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461482
  35. UNESCO (2006). Preparation, recruitment, and retention of teachers. Paris, France: Cooper, J.M & Alvarado, A. Wardani, S. (2008). Pengembangan ketrampilan proses sains dalam pembelajaran kromatografi lapis tipis melalui praktikum skala mikro [Developing Science Process Skill in Teaching and Learning Thin Layer Chromatography through Micro Laboratory]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 2 (2), 317-322.
  36. Wei, R.C. & Pecheone, R. L. (2010). Assessment for learning in preservice teacher education: Performance-based assessments. In M. M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 69-132) San Francicco CA: Jossey Bass. https://scale.stanford.edu/system/files/WeiPecheone.pdf
  37. Wiyanto, Sopyan, A., Nugroho, & Wibowo, S.W.A. (2006). Potret pembelajaran sains di SMP dan SMA [The View of Science Teaching and Learning in Secondary Schools]. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 4(2), 63-66.
  38. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v4i2.170
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.