Maria Karnezou & Anastasios Zoupidis
Abstract: Current science curricula adopt inquiry as a basic component in their proposals, and at the same time they place emphasis on the non-formal aspect of education, due to the fact that inquiry is easier to be implemented in science centers and museums. In this context, both teachers and museum educators’ roles are viewed with a common lens, as though both groups of professionals have critical roles in the success of a school museum visit, they do not necessarily share the same agenda for the visit. In the present small-scale qualitative research, we studied two Greek science teachers and two museum educators who attended a joint professional development course on the Tinkering approach in Milan in the context of an EU funded project. We looked into the impact of the joint course on their views about inquiry and specifically their views about inquiry before and after being exposed to inquiry based Tinkering activities. We also studied their views about the joint course per se. Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews and the participants’ notes. The results point both to some different and common points between teachers and museum educators’ views. The opportunity to exploit the results in a broader non-formal science education context is also being discussed.
Please Cite: Karnezou, M. & Zoupidis, A. (2020). Teachers and Museum Educators’ Views About Inquiry Practices: The Aftermath of a Joint Professional Development Course. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(1), 3-14.
References Allen, L.B., & Crowley, K.J. (2014). Challenging Beliefs, Practices, and Content: How Museum Educators Change. Science Education 98, 84-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21093 Astor-Jack, T., McCallie, E., & Balcerzak, P. (2007). Academic and Informal Science Practitioner Views About Professional Development in Science Education. Science Education, 91(4), 604-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20205 Ash, D. B., Lombana, J., & Alcala, L. (2012). Changing practices, changing identities as museum educators. In E. Davidsson, A. Jakobsson, (eds.), Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums: Approaching Sociocultural Perspectives, 23–44. Sense Publishers Buehl, M.M., & Beck, J.S. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M.G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs, (pp. 66-84). Routledge, NewYork. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203108437.ch3 Bevan, B., & Xanthoudaki, M. (2008). Professional development for museum educators: Underpinning the underpinnings. Journal of Museum Education, 33(2), 107 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2008.11510592 Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning Through STEM-Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151 Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abington, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342 Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1997). Research Methods in Education. 4th ed. London: Routledge. DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A Short Review of School visits: Key Findings from the Past and Implications for the Future, Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562 Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9297-y Gess‐Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.) Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158 Janssen, F.J.J.M., Westbroek, H., & Van Driel, J.H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers? Instructional Science, 42(1), 67-90. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/167982/. Kisiel, J. (2013). Introducing Future Teachers to Science Beyond the Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9288-x Kisiel, J. (2005). An examination of fieldtrip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education, 90(3), 434 – 452. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20117 National Research Council (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, and M. A. Feder, (Eds.) Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12190 National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Skayia, A., Avraamidou, L., & Evagorou, M. (2019). How Preservice Elementary Teachers Develop Their Personal Philosophies About Science Teaching: The Role of Informal Science Approaches. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(2), 71-84. doi:10.31756/jrsmte.222 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage publications. Τran, L.U. (2008). The work of science museum educators. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802012219 Tsaliki C., Malandrakis G., Zoupidis A., Karnezou M., & P. Kariotoglou (2016). Science teachers’ profile changes concerning non-formal education design. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto & K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 14 Strand 14 In-service science teacher education, continued professional development, Co-editors: Amanda Berry & Digna Couso, (pp. 2370-2377). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6. Tseng, C.H., Tuan, H.L., & Chin, C.C. (2013). How to help teachers develop inquiry teaching: perspectives from experienced science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3 Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.