Vol. 3 Iss. 1

In this issue:
• Are we accidentally teaching students to mistrust science?
• Teachers and Museum Educators’ Views About Inquiry Practices: The Aftermath of a Joint Professional Development Course
• Attempting to Develop Secondary Student’s Interest for Science and Technology Through an In-Service Teacher Training Initiative Based on the Principles of the Learning Community

Are we accidentally teaching students to mistrust science?

William W. Cobern

Download: 143, size: 0, date: 06.Jan.2020

Almost 60 years ago Jawaharlal Nehru speaking about the future of India’s economy and society observed that it is “science alone that can solve the problems of hunger and poverty, of sanitation and literacy, of superstition and tradition, of vast resources running to waste, of a rich country inhabited by starving people… The future belongs to science and to those who make friends with science.”



Editors. (2017). School daze: As US states turn the screw on science education, researchers everywhere should pay more attention to how their subject is presented. Nature, 543, 149.

Nehru, J. (1960). Science Quotes by Jawaharlal Nehru. Dictionary of Science Quotations Scientist Quotations Index. Retrieved from https://todayinsci.com/N/Nehru_Jawaharlal/NehruJawaharlal-Quotations.htm
Vol. 3 Iss. 1

Teachers and Museum Educators’ Views About Inquiry Practices: The Aftermath of a Joint Professional Development Course

Maria Karnezou & Anastasios Zoupidis

Download: 45, size: 0, date: 25.Jan.2021

Abstract: Current science curricula adopt inquiry as a basic component in their proposals, and at the same time they place emphasis on the non-formal aspect of education, due to the fact that inquiry is easier to be implemented in science centers and museums. In this context, both teachers and museum educators’ roles are viewed with a common lens, as though both groups of professionals have critical roles in the success of a school museum visit, they do not necessarily share the same agenda for the visit. In the present small-scale qualitative research, we studied two Greek science teachers and two museum educators who attended a joint professional development course on the Tinkering approach in Milan in the context of an EU funded project. We looked into the impact of the joint course on their views about inquiry and specifically their views about inquiry before and after being exposed to inquiry based Tinkering activities. We also studied their views about the joint course per se. Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews and the participants’ notes. The results point both to some different and common points between teachers and museum educators’ views. The opportunity to exploit the results in a broader non-formal science education context is also being discussed.

Please Cite: Karnezou, M. & Zoupidis, A. (2020). Teachers and Museum Educators’ Views About Inquiry Practices: The Aftermath of a Joint Professional Development Course. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(1), 3-14.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.311   


Allen, L.B., & Crowley, K.J. (2014). Challenging Beliefs, Practices, and Content: How Museum Educators Change. Science Education 98, 84-105.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21093

Astor-Jack, T., McCallie, E., & Balcerzak, P. (2007). Academic and Informal Science Practitioner Views About Professional Development in Science Education. Science Education, 91(4), 604-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20205

Ash, D. B., Lombana, J., & Alcala, L. (2012). Changing practices, changing identities as museum educators. In E. Davidsson, A. Jakobsson, (eds.), Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums: Approaching Sociocultural Perspectives, 23–44. Sense Publishers

Buehl, M.M., & Beck, J.S. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M.G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs, (pp. 66-84). Routledge, NewYork. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203108437.ch3

Bevan, B., & Xanthoudaki, M. (2008). Professional development for museum educators: Underpinning the underpinnings. Journal of Museum Education, 33(2), 107 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2008.11510592

Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning Through STEM-Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abington, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342

Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1997). Research Methods in Education. 4th ed. London: Routledge.

DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A Short Review of School visits: Key Findings from the Past and Implications for the Future, Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562

Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining the beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9297-y

Gess‐Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.) Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158

Janssen, F.J.J.M., Westbroek, H., & Van Driel, J.H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers? Instructional Science, 42(1), 67-90. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/167982/.

Kisiel, J. (2013). Introducing Future Teachers to Science Beyond the Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9288-x

Kisiel, J. (2005). An examination of fieldtrip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education, 90(3), 434 – 452. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20117

National Research Council (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, and M. A. Feder, (Eds.) Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/12190

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Skayia, A., Avraamidou, L., & Evagorou, M. (2019). How Preservice Elementary Teachers Develop Their Personal Philosophies About Science Teaching: The Role of Informal Science Approaches. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(2), 71-84. doi:10.31756/jrsmte.222

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage publications. 

Τran, L.U. (2008). The work of science museum educators. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770802012219

Tsaliki C., Malandrakis G., Zoupidis A., Karnezou M., & P. Kariotoglou (2016). Science teachers’ profile changes concerning non-formal education design. In J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto & K. Hahl (Eds.), Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference. Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, Part 14 Strand 14 In-service science teacher education, continued professional development, Co-editors: Amanda Berry & Digna Couso, (pp. 2370-2377). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.

Tseng, C.H., Tuan, H.L., & Chin, C.C. (2013). How to help teachers develop inquiry teaching: perspectives from experienced science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3

Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Vol. 3 Iss. 1

Attempting to Develop Secondary Student’s Interest for Science and Technology Through an In-Service Teacher Training Initiative Based on the Principles of the Learning Community

Patrice Potvin, Abdelkrim Hasni, & Ousmane Sy

Download: 290, size: 0, date: 06.Jan.2020

Abstract: This article presents the results of a quasi-experimental research that has been conducted by the (Infrastructure of the authors) for two years. This research aimed at increasing student’s interest for science and technology (ST) by enhanced pedagogical interventions, designed by their teachers in the context of a learning community. It also aimed at measuring this possible increase. Results show that three of the four intervention types (scientific inquiry, context-based and project-based learning) had positive effects of various strengths on students’ interest, but that collaborative teaching did not. Hypotheses to explain these results and recommendations are formulated.

Please Cite: Potvin, P., Hasni, A., & Sy, O. (2020). Attempting to Develop Secondary Students’ Interest for Science and Technology Through an In-service Teacher Training Initiative Based on the Principles of the Learning Community. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(1), 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.312   


Akinbobola, A. (2009). Enhancing students' attitude towards nigerian senior secondary school physics through the use of cooperative, competitive ans individualistic learning strategies. Australian journal of teacher education, 34(1), 1-9.

Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Influence of Motivation, Self-Beliefs, and Instructional Practices on Science Achievement of Adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 14(2), 233-259. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9

Barmby, P., Kind, M. P., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing Attitudes in secondary school science. International journal of science education, 30(8), 1075-1093. doi:  10.1080/09500690701344966

Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and models (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cavas, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science learning. Science education international, 22(1), 31-42.

Chanier, T., & Cartier, J. (2006). Communauté d’apprentissage et communauté de pratique en ligne : le processus réflexif dans la formation des formateurs [Online learning community and community of practice: the reflective process in training trainers]. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 3(3), 64-82.

Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, Attitudes and Images Related to Science: Combining Students' Voices with the Voices of School Science, Teachers, and Popular Science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141-159.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second ed.): Routledge.

Couture, C., Dionne, C., Savoie-Jazc, L., & Aurousseau, E. (2012). Ajustements de pratique d’enseignants de l’élémentaire en sciences et technologie [Adjustments in the practice of elementary science and technology teachers]. Formation et profession, 20(3), 1-13.

Daele, A., & Charlier, B. (2006). Pourquoi les communautés d’enseignants aujourd’hui? Comprendre les communautés virtuelles d’enseignants. Pratiques et recherches [Why the teacher communities today? Understanding virtual communities of teachers. Practices and research] (pp. 83-104). Paris: L'Harmattan.

Dionne, L., Lemyre, F., & Savoie-Jazc, L. (2010). Vers une définition englobante de la communauté d’apprentissage (CA) comme dispositif de développement professionnel [Towards an all-encompassing definition of the learning community (CA) as a device for professional development]. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 36(1), 25-43. doi: 10.7202/043985ar

George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes toward science and attitudes about the utility of science. International journal of science education, 28(6), 571-589. Doi: 10.1080/09500690500338755

Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 101(3), 729-739. doi : 10.1037/a0015084

Gouvernement du Québec. (2004). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise, Enseignement secondaire, Premier cycle. Québec [Quebec school training program, Secondary education, First cycle] Les publications du Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec.

Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An Intervention Study To Enhance Girls' Interest, Self-Concept, and Achievement in Physics Classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 870-888. doi: 10.1002/tea.10048

Hasni, A., Belletête, V., & Potvin, P. (2018). Les démarches d’investigation scientifique. Un outil de réflexion sur les pratiques de classe. Sherbrooke [Scientific investigation procedures. A tool for reflecting on class practices] Centre de recherche sur l’enseignement et l’apprentissage des sciences / Chaire de recherche sur l’intérêt des jeunes à l’égard des sciences et de la technologie.

Hasni, A., & Potvin, P. (2015). L'intérêt pour les sciences et la technologie à l'école: Résultats d'une enquête auprès d'élèves du primaire et du secondaire au Québec [Interest in Science and Technology in Schools: Results of a Survey of Elementary and Secondary Students in Quebec]. Retrieved from Montréal: http://www.crijest.org/sites/crijest.org/files/Hasni-Potvin-Rapport-CRIJEST-2015-VF.pdf

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. doi : 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Labelle, J., Freiman, V., Barrette, J., Cormier, M., & Doucet, Y. (2014). Communauté d’apprentissage professionnelle et formation professionnelle en matière de douance [Professional Learning Community and Vocational Training in Giftedness]. Formation et profession, 22(3), 24-36.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

OCDE. (2005). Declining Student Enrolment in Science and Technology: Is It Real? What Are The Causes? What Can Be Done? Paris: Publications de l'OCDE.

OCDE. (2006). Évolution de l'intérêt des jeunes pour les études scientifiques et technologiques, rapport d'orientation [Evolution of young people's interest in scientific and technological studies, orientation report]. Paris: Publications de l'OCDE.

Osborne, J., Simon, C., & Collin, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education, 25(9), 1049-1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199

Pan, Y., & Gauvain, M. (2012). The continuity of college students’ autonomous learning motivation and its predictors: A three-year longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 92-99. doi : 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.010

Potvin, P. (2018). Faire apprendre les sciences et la technologie à l'école. Épistémologie, didactique, sciences cognitives et neurosciences au service de l'enseignant [Teaching science and technology at school. Epistemology, didactics, cognitive sciences and neurosciences at the service of the teacher]. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014a). Analysis of the Decline in Interest Towards School Science and Technology from Grades 5 Through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784-802. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014b). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in science education, 50(1), 85-129. doi:10.1080/03057267.2014.881626

Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2013). Développer et implanter des interventions pédagogiques favorisant l'intérêt en science et technologie en se basant sur la recherche [Developing and implementing educational interventions promoting interest in science and technology based on research]. Spectre, Revue de l'Association pour l'Enseignement de la Science et de la Technologie au Québec, 43, 8-12.

Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 67-81. doi: 10.1080/02635140220130939

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.587723

Schaap, H., Louws, M., Meirink, J., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Van Der Want, A., Zuiker, I, Zwart R., & Meijer, P. (2019) Tensions experienced by teachers when participating in a professional learning community. Professional Development in Education, 45 (5), 814-831, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1547781

Shachar, H., & Fischer, S. (2004). Cooperative Learning and the Achievement of Motivation and Perceptions of Students in 11th Grade Chemistry Classes. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 69-87. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.003

Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of educational research, 95(6), 323-332. doi: 10.1080/00220670209596607

Turner, S., & Ireson, G. (2014). Fifteen pupils’ positive approach to primary school science: when does it decline? Educational Studies, 36(2), 119-141. doi: 10.1080/03055690903148662

Vossen, T.E., Henze, I., De Vries, M.J. & Van Driel, J.H. (2019). Finding the connection between research and design: the knowledge development of STEM teachers in a professional learning community. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Online first doi :10.1007/s10798-019-09507-7
Vol. 3 Iss. 1