All posts by: technovision

About technovision

Graduate Research Special Issue

Are you looking for an opportunity to share your graduate research? The Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (JRSMTE) will publish a special issue in 2022 and is looking for recent graduates or for those that will be graduating soon to submit a paper to the special issue. The objective of JRSMTE is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in science, mathematics, and technology education.
Submission Guidelines:
• Manuscripts should focus on research in the areas of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education at all levels.
• Research must have been conducted primarily by a graduate student. Other individuals may be co-authors; however, the primary author needs to be a graduate student (Master’s or Ph. D.).
• Manuscripts should not be previously published in peer-reviewed literature or be under consideration for publication in any other peer-reviewed journal or book, including in another language.
• Manuscripts should be 6000 words maximum (without references, and appendixes).
• Manuscripts should follow the formatting guidelines found here and the APA 7th Edition Publication Standards.
Important Dates:
• Acceptance of Papers: August 1st, 2021 to March 1st, 2022.
• Review Period: September 1st, 2021 to May 1st, 2022.
• Publication of the Accepted Papers: June 15th, 2022.
A Best-Paper Award will be granted to the best manuscript according to the following criteria:
• Report original research and add significantly to the literature.
• Be of interest to the Education Community.
• Have sound motivation and purpose.
• Be scientifically rigorous.
A Certificate of Best Paper will be given.

Manuscripts should be submitted here with the subject line “JRSMTE Graduate Research Special Issue”. In case you have any questions, please, contact Priscila Corrêa at [email protected] or Richelle Marynowski at [email protected]

Download: JRSMTE Special Issue1
Download: 98, size: 0, date: 17.Jul.2021
Special Issue 1

Developing Engineering Identity in an Introductory Engineering Course: A Multi-Case Analysis

Christine Allison Gray & Ron E. Gray & Martha M. Canipe & Shadow W. J. Armfield & Robin Tuchscherer 

Download: JRSMTE 15 04 21 GRAY
Download: 38, size: 0, date: 07.Jun.2021

Abstract: Research in engineering education has identified several factors relevant to the development of students’ identity as engineers. Here we examine the engineering identity of undergraduate engineering students after an introductory engineering course. The specific research question explored here is: “How do engineering students in an introductory engineering course interpret competence, performance, and recognition in relation to their identities as engineers?” We used a modified engineering identity framework to explore the development of engineering identity within the undergraduate engineering context through a multiple case study approach. Six students majoring in engineering participated in the study. The students had divergent perspectives on what it meant to be competent as an engineer. In all cases, students connected both competence and performance as an engineer with persistence. At this introductory stage, self-recognition as an engineering person took center stage for each student. All were able to identify themselves strongly as an engineering person. The findings add to the current understandings about the development of engineering identity, and suggest that engineering identity may be critically important in conversations about the steps faculty may take in working with students to promote increased retention of undergraduate students in engineering.

Keywords: Engineering Identity; Multi-case study; Undergraduate.

Please Cite: Gray, C.A., Gray, R.E., Canipe, M.M., Armfield, S.W.J., & Tuchscherer, R. (2021). Developing engineering identity in an introductory engineering course: A multi-case analysis. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(3), 153-177. DOI:


Bastalich, W., Franzway, S., Gill, J., Mills, J., & Sharp, R. (2007). Disrupting masculinities: Women engineers and
engineering workplace culture. Australian Feminist Studies, 22(54), 385-400.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and
implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189.
Blickenstaff, J.C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education,
17(4), 369-386.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science
identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.
Cass, C. A. P., Hazari, Z., Cribbs, J., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2011). Examining the impact of mathematics
identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students. Frontiers in Education
Conference (FIE), F2H-1-F2H-5.
Choe, N. H., Martins, L. L., Borrego, M., & Kendall, M. R. (2019). Professional Aspects of Engineering: Improving
Prediction of Undergraduates’ Engineering Identity. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Education and Practice, 145(3), 04019006.
Dringenberg, E., Secules, S., & Kramer, A. (2019). Smartness in engineering culture: An interdisciplinary dialogue.
ASEE Conference, Tampa, FL. DOI: https://Doi. Org/10.18260/1-2–33272.
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Youth, identity and crisis. New York: Norton.
Fontana, A., & Prokos, A. H. (2007). The interview from formal to postmodern. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Left Coast
Freud, S. (1961). Five lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: Norton.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-
Godwin, A. (2016). The development of a measure of engineering identity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of
the American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA.
Godwin, A., & Lee, W. C. (2017). A cross-sectional study of engineering identity during undergraduate education.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, OH.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public place. Glencoe, NY: The Free Press.
Gray, C.A., Tuchscherer, R., & Gray, R.E. (2017). Examining micro-interventions to improve classroom community
in introductory engineering classrooms. Proceedings from ASEE 2017: American Society for Engineering
Education Annual Conference & Exposition (p. 36). Columbus, OH.
Gray, C.A., Tuchscherer, R., & Gray, R.E. (2018). The challenges and affordances of engineering identity as an
analytic lens. Proceedings from ASEE 2018: American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.
Jones, B. D., Osborne, J. W., Paretti, M. C., & Matusovich, H. M. (2014). Relationships among students’
perceptions of a first-year engineering design course and their engineering identification, motivational
beliefs, course effort, and academic outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6(A)),
Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological
Review, 19(1), 68-76.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research (Fifth edition). Los Angeles: Sage
Meyers, K. L., Ohland, M. W., Pawley, A. L., Silliman, S. E., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Factors relating to engineering
identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1), 119-131.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Morelock, J. R. (2017). A systematic literature review of engineering identity: Definitions, factors, and interventions
affecting development, and means of measurement. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6),
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2021). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in
Science and Engineering: 2021. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Patrick, A., Borrego, M., & Prybutiok, A. N. (2018). Predicting persistence in engineering through an engineering
identity scale. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2(A)), 351–363.
Patrick, A., Borrego, M., & Seepersad, C. C. (2018). A combined model for predicting engineering identity in
undergraduate students. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
Patrick, A., Riegle-Crumb, C., & Borrego, M. (2021). Examining the gender gap in engineering professional
identification. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 27(1).
Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development of a professional
identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education
Conference, 1–6.
Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 224-237.
Stryker, S. & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychological Quarterly,
63, 284-297.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worshel, S.; Austin, W.
(Eds.) The psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural
Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273-307.
Tuchscherer, R., Gray, C.A., & Gray, R.E. (2017). Reshaping engineering classroom norms to expand the
profession. Proceedings from ASEE 2017: American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Conference & Exposition (p. 15). Columbus, OH.
Tonso, K. L. (2014). Engineering identity. In Handbook of Engineering Education Research, (267-282).
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Online First

Gender Influence on Statistics Anxiety among Graduate Students

Mihili L.  Edirisooriya & Thomas J. Lipscomb

Download: 51, size: 0, date: 17.May.2021

Abstract: The present study was conducted to further explore gender-based differences in the experience of statistics anxiety among graduate students. A sample of 75 graduate students from a mid-sized research university in the southeastern United States were recruited to participate in a survey concerning statistics anxiety. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance and discriminant analysis. Using the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale, students’ statistics anxiety was measured. After accounting for age, the findings revealed a significant gender difference in statistics anxiety. A significant covariate effect of age indicated that older graduate students reported experiencing higher levels of anxiety as compared to their younger peers. Age accounted for 21% of variance in the combined statistics anxiety subscales. Analysis further revealed that males experienced higher levels of anxiety when seeking statistics help from a fellow student or a professor than did females. Implications for the design of statistics courses are discussed.

Keywords: Age; Gender; Graduate students; Statistics anxiety

Please Cite Edirisooriya, M. L., & Lipscomb T. J. (2020). Gender Influence on Statistics Anxiety among Graduate Students. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 63-74. DOI:


Baloğlu, M. (2003). Individual differences in statistics anxiety among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 855–865.

Baloğlu, M., Deniz, M. E., & Kesici, Ş. (2011). A descriptive study of individual and cross-cultural differences in statistics anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 387–391.

Brandish, E. K., & Baldwin, D. S. (2012). Anxiety disorders. Medicine, 40(11), 599–606.

Bui, N. H., & Alfaro, M. A. (2011). Statistics anxiety and science attitudes: Age, gender, and ethnicity factors. College Student Journal, 45(3), 573–586.

Chew, P. K. H., & Dillon, D. B. (2014a). Statistics anxiety and the big five personality factors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1177–1186.

Chew, P. K. H., & Dillon, D. B. (2014b). Statistics anxiety update: Refining the construct and recommendations for a new research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 196–208.

Coetzee, S., & Merwe, P. van der. (2010). Industrial psychology students’ attitudes towards statistics. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 8 pages.

Collins, K. M. T., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). I cannot read my statistics textbook: The relationship between reading ability and statistics anxiety. Journal of Negro Education, 76(2), 118–129.

Cruise, R. J., Cash, R. W., & Bolton, D. L. (1985). Development and validation of an instrument to measure statistical anxiety. Proceedings of the Section on Statistical Education, 92–97.

Cui, S., Zhang, J., Guan, D., Zhao, X., & Si, J. (2019). Antecedents of statistics anxiety: An integrated account. Personality and Individual Differences, 144, 79–87.

Dykeman, B. F. (2011). Statistics anxiety: Antecedents and instructional interventions. Education, 132(2), 441–446.

Faber, G., & Drexler, H. (2020). Predicting education science students’ statistics anxiety: The role of prior experiences within a framework of domain-specific motivation constructs. Higher Learning Research Communications, 9(1).

Galla, B. M., & Wood, J. J. (2012). Emotional self-efficacy moderates anxiety-related impairments in math performance in elementary school-age youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 118–122.

Hanna, D., Shevlin, M., & Dempster, M. (2008). The structure of the statistics anxiety rating scale: A confirmatory factor analysis using UK psychology students. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 68–74.

Hsiao, T., & Chiang, S. (2011). Gender differences in statistics anxiety among graduate students learning English as a foreign language. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(1), 41.

Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 412–420.

Jehu, D. (1970). The role of social workers in behavior therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1(1), 17–28.

Koh, D., & Zawi, M. K. (2014). Statistics Anxiety among Postgraduate Students. International Education Studies, 7(13).

Lavasani, M. G., Weisani, M., & Ejei, J. (2011). The role of achievement goals, academic motivation, and learning strategies in statistics anxiety: Testing a causal model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1881–1886.

Lavasani, M. G., Weisani, M., & Shariati, F. (2014). The role of achievement goals, academic motivation in statistics anxiety: Testing a causal model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 933–938.

Liu, L., & Haque, M. D. (2017). Age difference in research course satisfaction in a blended Ed.D. program: A moderated mediation model of the effects of internet self­ efficacy and statistics anxiety. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 20(2).

Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322.

Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., & Ruggeri, K. (2012). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 483–498.

Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., Ruggeri, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Arendasy, M. (2013). Statistics anxiety, state anxiety during an examination, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 535–549.

Mji, A. (2009). Differences in university students’ attitudes and anxiety about statistics. Psychological Reports, 104(3), 737–744.

Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Vargas-Vargas, M. (2010). Determinant factors of attitude towards quantitative subjects: Differences between sexes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 688–693.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Wilson, V. A. (2003). Statistics Anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments–a comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 195–209.

Paechter, M., Macher, D., Martskvishvili, K., Wimmer, S., & Papousek, I. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and statistics anxiety. Shared but also unshared components and antagonistic contributions to performance in statistics. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.

Pan, W., & Tang, M. (2005). Students’ perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(3), 205–214.

Rodarte-Luna, B., & Sherry, A. (2008). Sex differences in the relation between statistics anxiety and cognitive/learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 327–344.

Smith, T. F., & Capuzzi, G. (2019). Using a mindset intervention to reduce anxiety in the statistics classroom. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 326–336.
Vol. 4 Iss. 2

STEM practices in Science teacher education curriculum: Perspectives from two secondary school teachers’ colleges in Zimbabwe

Christopher Mutseekwa

Download: 44, size: 0, date: 17.May.2021

Abstract: This study assessed how science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education is integrated in Science Teacher Education curriculum in Zimbabwe. An exploratory mixed methods research design, within the post-positivist paradigm, was used to guide the collection and analysis of data. Data were sourced from 18 Science teacher educators and 108 final year Science student teachers pooled from two secondary school Teachers’ Colleges through a semi-structured questionnaire, follow-up interviews, focusgroups and documents. From the findings, it was evident that although a lot was done to promote STEM literacy in the two colleges, integration of STEM education and practices into the science education curriculum was coincidental rather than planned. Participation in Science exhibitions at local and national level that was common and increased enrolment of teacher candidates in STEM subjects was viewed as major ways to promote the initiative in the Teachers’ Colleges. However, support that targeted a teacher education STEM curriculum and integration/liaison with Engineering and industry was largely found lacking, suggesting the need for practices such as field-trips, work visits and partnerships that foster closer collaboration between colleges, schools, professional scientists and industry.

Keywords: Industry liaison; Integration; STEM curriculum; STEM education; STEM literacy; Professional scientists

Please Cite: Mutseekwa, C. (2021). STEM practices in Science teacher education curriculum: Perspectives from two secondary school teachers’ colleges in Zimbabwe. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 75-92



Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing STEM conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal in Mathematics’ Science and Technology, 4(1), 56-71.

Anderson, L. (2014) Visiual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education. Roeper Review, 36(2), 114-121.

Andree, M., & Hansson, L. (2013). Marketing the ‘Broad line’: Invitations to STEM education           in a Swedish recruitment campaign. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 147-166.

Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9, 235-245.

Britton, S. A., & Tippins, D. J. (2015). Practice or theory: Situating science teacher preparation within a context of ecojustice philosophy. Research Science Education, 45, 425-443.

CFPSE (2015). Curriculum framework for primary and secondary education. Harare: Government Printers (Zimbabwe).

Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics pre-service teachers regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487.

Childs, P. E., Flaherty, A., & Limerick I. E. (2016). From laboratory to e-laboratory: On the history of practical work in              school science. In I. Melle (Eds.), Science education research and practical work. Conference proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on Chemistry and Science Education, Dortmund, Germany. html

Cooke, A., & Walker, R. (2015). Exploring STEM              education through pre-service teacher conceptualisations of mathematics. International Journal in Mathematics and Science Education, 23(3), 35-46.

Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (Eds.). (2009). Special issues on scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.

Collins, A., & Gillespie, N. (2009). The continuum of secondary science teacher preparation: Knowledge, questions and recommendations. Sense Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Prentice Hall.

Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in Schools, 29(1-2), 157-173.

DeBoer, G. E. (2011). The globalization of science              education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 567-591.

Dhindsa, H. S., & Anderson, O. R. (2004). Using a conceptual change approach to help preservice science teachers reorganise their knowledge structures for constructivist teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(1), 63-85.

Feinstein, N. W., & Kirchgasler, K. L. (2015). Sustainability in science education? How the next generation science standards approach sustainability and why it matters. Science Education, 99, 121-144.

Goodwin, A. L., Smith, L., Sauto-Manning, M., Cherevu, R., Tan, M. Y., Reed, R. & Taveras, L. (2014). What should teacher educators be able to know and do? Perspectives from practicing teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 284-302.

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J. & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1).

Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M. & Moore, T. J. (2018). Development of an instrument to assess attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 271-279.

Hallstrom, J., & Schonborn, K. J. (2019). Models and modelling for authentic education: reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM education, 6(22), 1-20.

Hasanah, U. (2020). Key definitions of STEM education: Literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), e2217.

Henderson. A. K. (2011). Post- positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences and Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(4), 341-346.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Allyn and Bacon.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-0046-z 

Khuyen, N. T., Bien, N. V., Lin, P., & Lin, J. Chang, C. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12, 1531. doi.10.3390/su12041531

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

Liu, F. (2020). Addressing STEM in the context of teacher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 129-134.

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271-283.

Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, source and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content         knowledge. Kluwer.

Magombe, E. (2012). Conducting practical and investigations in science and mathematics. In L. P. Kusure & K. Basira, (Eds.), Proceedings of the First National Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Conference on Instruction in science and methematics for the 21st century (pp. 23-34). Bindura, Zimbabwe: Bindura University of Science Education.

Meyer, H., & Jackson, H. (2016). Transforming STEM education through teacher training. University of Cincinnati Press.

Mhakure, D., & Mushaikwa, N. (2014). Science teachers’ indigenous knowledge identities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 1-12.

Mudavanhu, Y. (2015). Contradictions and tensions in students’ motives of enrolling in a teacher education programme in Zimbabwe.              Journal of Education and Training              Studies, 3(2), 159-171.

Parker, C. E., Stylinski, C. D., Bonney, C. R., Schillac, R., & McAuliffe, C. (2015). Examining the quality of technology implementation in STEM classrooms: Demonstration of an         evaluative framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(2), 105-121.

Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2016). A1 as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teacher metacognition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 697-700.

Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 145-156.

Rosicka, C. (2016). From concept to classroom: Translating STEM education research into practice. Australian Council for Educational Research.

Ryan, B. A. (2006). Post- positivism approaches to              research. In: Researching and writing your thesis: A guide for post graduate students. MACE: Maynooth Adult and Community Education, 12-26.

Semali, L., & Mehta, K. (2012). Science education in Tanzania: Challenges and policy    responses. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 225-239.

Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Lu Chong, C. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-  service              teachers regarding a project-based STEM              approach to teaching. Springer Open Journal 4(8), 1-20.

Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, A. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on student achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0549.

Tan, A., & Leong, W. F. (2014). Mapping curriculum innovation in STEM schools to assessment requirements: Tensions and dilemmas. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 11-17.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boove-de Pauw, J., Deprez, J., DeCock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P. & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices of secondary education. Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-12.

Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering and mathematics education agenda: An update of state actions. NGA Centre for Best Practice: Blackpoint Policy Solutions, LLC.

Tirivanhu, M. S. (2014). Experiences and preparedness of school-based mentors in supervising student teachers on teaching practice in Zimbabwe. British Journal of Education, Society and Behaviuoral Changes, 4(11), 1476-1488.

Vingsle, C. (2014). Formative assessment: Teacher              knowledge and skills to make it happen. Licentiate and thesis UMEA Universitet, 15, 1-23.

White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important? Florida Association of Teacher Educators’ Journal, 1(14), 1-9.

Yednak, C. (2016). The lowdown on STEM schools.

Yildiz, S. G., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2015). A content analysis about STEM education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14-21.

Zimbabwe School Examinations Council. (2015).              Ordinary level syllabus: Physical science (5009).Zimbabwe School Examinations Council.
Vol. 4 Iss. 2

Constructivism in the Shade of Racial, Ethnic, and Special Needs Diversity Students

George Kaliampos

Download: 36, size: 0, date: 17.May.2021

Abstract: The last decades the population of learners has dramatically changed in the majority of western societies. Students with diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds as well as students that fall into the scope of special education needs have enrolled in schooling without being able to perform competitively in science compared to the mainstream students. A prominent reason, among others, lies on the fact that the cultural origins of these pupils are often not taken into account into the teaching process. It seems that these children are taught science in school without any consideration, from both their teachers and the curriculum, about their diversity background and their unique life experiences that have inevitably affected their way of viewing the natural worldaround them. The present paper aspires to shed light on this issue and act as a call for science education pioneers to expand constructivism theory in order to address student diversity in science classroom.

Keywords: Diversity students; Science education; Special needs.

Please Cite: Kaliampos, G. (2021). Constructivism in the shade of racial, ethnic and special needs diversity students. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 93-105. DOI:         


Aydeniz, M., Cihak, D., Graham, S., & Retinger, L. (2012). Using inquiry-based instruction for teaching science to students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 189-206.

Azam, S. (2020). Addressing student diversity in science classroom: Exploring topic-specific personal pedagogical content knowledge of high school teachers. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and technology Education, 3(3), 141-163.

Baquete, A., Grayson, D., & Mutimucuio, I. (2016). An exploration of indigenous knowledge related to physics concepts held by senior citizens in Chokwe, Mazombique. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 1-16.

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5, 47-78.

Borgerding, L. A., & Raven, S. (2018). Children's ideas about fossils and foundational concepts related to fossils. Science Education, 102, 414-439.

Brigham, F., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 223-232.

Carlisle, J., & Chang, V. (1996). Evaluation of academic capabilities in science by students with and without learning disabilities and their teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 18-34.

Cawley, J., & Parmar, R. (2001). Literacy proficiency and science for students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17(2), 105-125.

Chia, N. (2011). Teaching Singaporean children with autism spectrum disorders to understand science concepts through Autistic Logic Analysis/Synthesis (ALA/S). Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, Spring-Summer, 79-89.

Cobern, W. (1996), Constructivism and non-western science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 287-302.

Dart, F. (1972). Science and the worldview: Any attempt to provide equal educational opportunities for all must involve us in an effort to reconcile cultural differences whose existence and implications we have largely ignored. Physics Today, 25(6), 48-54.

Driver, R. (1991). Culture clash: Children and science. New Scientist, 130, 46-48.

Driver, R. (1989). Student’s conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-480.

Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press.

Fragkiadaki, G., Fleer, M., & Ravanis, K. (2021). Understanding the complexity of young children’s learning and development in science: A twofold methodological model building on constructivist and cultural-historical strengths. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 1-13.

Gaddy, S., Bakken, J., & Fulk, B. (2008). The effects of teaching text-structure strategies to postsecondary students with learning disabilities to improve their reading comprehension on expository science text passages. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 20(2), 100-119.

George, J. M., & Glasgow, J. L. (1999). The boundaries between Caribbean beliefs and practices and conventional science. Office of the UNESCO Representative in the Caribbean.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. Sage.

Hewson, M., & Hamlyn, D. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 245-262.

Horsthemke, K. (2004). Indigenous knowledge – conceptions and misconceptions. Journal of Education, 32, 31-48.

Ingle, R., & Turner, A. (1981). Science curricula as cultural misfits. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 357-371.

Jaja, J. (2014). Myths in African concept of reality. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 6(2), 9-14.

Kaliampos, G., & Ravanis, K. (2019). Thermal conduction in metals: Mental representations in 5-6 years old children’s thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(1), 1-9.

Kaliampos, G., Ravanis, K., & Vavougios, D. (2020). A comparison study of alternative conceptions on impetus theory and projectile motion of adolescents with typical development and high functioning autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 128-156.

Kaliampos, G. (2015). A small scale, quantitatively study on exploring alternative conceptions of mechanics in students with autism. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 2(2), 110-119.

Keul, A., Freller, M., Himmelbauer, R., Holzer, B., & Isak, B. (2009). Journal of Lightning Research, 1, 28-35.

Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 105-118.

King, D. & Skipper, A. (2006). Understanding local weather and climate using Maori environmental knowledge. Water and Atmosphere, 14(2), 22-23

King, D., Goff, J., & Skipper, A. (2007). Maori environmental knowledge and natural hazards in Aoteaora – New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 37(2), 59-73.

Krajmer, P., Janosikova, D., Spajdel, M., & Ostatnikova, D. (2010). Empathizing, systemizing, intuitive physics and folk psychology in boys with asperger syndrome. Activitas Nervosa Superior Rediviva, 52(1), 57-61.

Lee, O. (2005). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 431-440.

Lee, O. (1997). Diversity and equity for Asian American students in science education. Culture and Comparative Studies, 81(1), 107-122.

Maleza, O., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2012). Constructive teaching of Physical Sciences (PH) in the context of parallel support: Case study of a pupil with autism. In Proceedings of the 2nd Greek Conference of Parents' Schools. The family is being trained ... lifelong, Athens, 8-10 November 2012, Youth and Lifelong Learning Foundation (INEDIBIM) -YPDMU. (in Greek)

Mashoko, D. (2014). Indigenous knowledge for plant medicine: inclusion into school science teaching and learning in Zimbabwe. International Journal of English and Education, 3(3), 528-540.

McKinley, E., Waiti, P., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 579-595.

Moin, L., Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2009). Instructional activities and group work in the US inclusive high school co-taught science class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 677-697.

Norman, K., Caseau, C., & Stefanich, G. (1998). Teaching students wth disabilities in inclusive science classrooms: Survey results. Science Education, 82, 127-146.

Ogawa, M. (1986). Toward a new rationale of science education in a non-western society. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 113-119.

Ogunniyi, M. B. (1998). Adapting western science to traditional African culture. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 1-9.

Paganini, C., & Gaido, D. (2013). Perception in autism: an interactive global research between folk psychology and folk physics. Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 7(2), 175-195.

Pare, G. & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Handbook of eHealth evaluation: An evidence-based approach. Francis Lau and Craig Kuziemsky

Parmar, R., Deluca, C., & Janczak, T. (1994). Investigations into the relationship between science and language abilities of students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 117-126.

Patel, F. (1997). Culture in science education. European Journal of Intercultural studies, 8(3), 213-230.

Ravanis, K., & Boilevin, J.-M. (2009). A comparative approach to the representation of light for five-, eight- and ten-year-old children: didactical perspectives. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(3), 182-190.

Remountaki, E.-L., Fragkiadaki, G. & Ravanis, K. (2017). The approach of solid in liquid dissolution in early childhood education settings: a socio-cultural approach. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(6), 303-318.

Ross, K., & Clive, R. (1982). Concept profiles and the cultural context. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 311-323.

Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (1994). The construction of scientific knowledge by students with mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 307-321.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

Trengove, E. & Jandrell, I. (2011). Strategies for understanding lightning myths and beliefs. IJRRAS, 7(3), 287-294.

Turner, S. (2008). School science and its controversies: Or, whatever happened to scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 55-72.

UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion. Paris UNESCO.

Villanueva, M., Taylor, J., Therrien, W., & Hand, B. (2012). Science education for students with special needs. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 187-215.

Villanueva, M., & Hand, B. (2011). Science for all: Engaging students with special needs in and about science. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 233-240.

Zuniga, K., Olson, J., & Winter, M. (2005). Science education for rural Latino/a students: Course placement and success in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 376-402.

Vol. 4 Iss. 2

The Mathematical Proficiency Promoted by Mathematical Modelling

Priscila Dias Corrêa

Download: 50, size: 0, date: 05.May.2021

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the mathematical proficiency promoted by mathematical modelling tasks that require students to get involved in the processes of developing mathematical models, instead of just using known or given models. The research methodology is grounded on design-based research, and the classroom design framework is supported by complexity science underpinnings. The research intervention consists of high-school students, from a grade 11 mathematics course, aiming to solve four different modelling tasks in four distinct moments. Data was collected during the intervention from students’ written mathematical work and audio and video recordings, and from recall interviews after the intervention. Data analysis was conducted based on a model of mathematical proficiency and assisted by interpretive diagrams created for this research purpose. This research study offers insight into mathematics teaching by portraying how mathematical modelling tasks can be integrated into mathematics classes to promote students’ mathematical proficiency. The study discusses observed expressions and behaviours in students’ development of mathematical proficiency and suggests a relationship between mathematical modelling processes and the promotion of mathematical proficiency. The study also reveals that students develop mathematical proficiency, even when they do not come to full resolutions of modelling tasks, which emphasizes the relevance of learning processes, and not only of the products of these processes.

Keywords: Classroom-based research; Complexity science; Design-based research; High-school level; Mathematical modelling; Mathematical proficiency.

Please Cite: Corrêa, P. D. (2021). The mathematical proficiency promoted by mathematical modelling. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 107-131.



Almeida, L., Silva, K. d., & Vertuan, R. (2013). Modelagem matemática na educação básica. Contexto.

Anderson, D., Nashon, S. M., & Thomas, G. P. (2009). Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 181-195.

Bahmaei, F. (2011). Mathematical modelling in primary school, advantages and challenges. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(9), 3-13.

Bassanezi, R. C. (1994). Modelagem como estratégia metodológica no ensino da matemática. Boletim de Educação da SBMAC.

Biembengut, M. S. (2009). 30 anos de modelagem matemática na educação brasileira: Das propostas primeiras às propostas atuais. Alexandria Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia, 2(2), 7-32.

Bleiler-Baxter, S. K., Barlow, A. T., & Stephens, D. C. (2016). Moving beyond context: Challenges in modelling instruction. In C. R. Hirsch, & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 53-64). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt? Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.

Blum, W., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2016). Advancing the teaching of mathematical modelling: Research-based concepts and examples. In C. R. Hirsch, & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 65-76). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Bonotto, C. (2010). Engaging students in mathematical modelling and problem posing activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(3), 18-32.

Bracke, M., & Geiger, A. (2011). Real-world modelling in regular lessons: A long-term experiment. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 529-549). Springer Netherlands.

Britzman, D. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. State University of New York Press.

Brown, J. P., & Edwards, I. (2011). Modelling tasks: Insight into mathematical understanding. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 187-197). Springer Netherlands.

Cavey, L. O., & Champion, J. (2016). Learning secondary school mathematics through authentic mathematical modelling tasks. In C. R. Hirsch, & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 131-141). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Cirillo, M., Pelesko, J. A., Felton-Koestler, M. D., & Rubel, L. (2016). Perspectives on modelling in school mathematics. In C. R. Hirsch, & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 3-16). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Corrêa, P. D. (2019). Observing high-school students' mathematical understanding and mathematical proficiency in the context of mathematical modelling. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 1, 143-151.

Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137-167.

Dias Corrêa, P. M. (2017). Observing high-school students’ mathematical understanding and mathematical proficiency in the context of mathematical modeling [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alberta]. ERA.

Doerr, H. M. (2006). Teachers' ways of listening and responding to students' emerging mathematical models. ZDM, 38(3), 255-268.

Dym, C. L. (2004). Principles of mathematical modelling. Academic Press.

Elasticity of demand. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wrights Land of Economics:

English, L., & Doerr, H. (2004). Learning through interacting with students' ways of thinking. Mathematics Education For the Third Millennium: Towards 2010. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1, 215-222.

Frejd, P. (2012). Teachers' conceptions of mathematical modelling at Swedish upper secondary school. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(5), 17-40.

Galbraith, P. (2011). Models of modelling: Genres, purposes or perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1, 3-16.

Gann, C., Avineri, T., Graves, J., Hernandez, M., & Teague, D. (2016). Moving students from remembering to thinking: The power of mathematical modelling. In C. R. Hirsch, & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 97-106). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and students cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549.

Ikeda, T., & Stephens, M. (2010). Three teaching principles for fostering students' thinking about modelling: An experimental teaching program for 9th grade students in Japan. Journal of Mathematics Modelling and Application, 1 (2), 49-59.

Kaiser, G., & Stender, P. (2013). Complex modelling problems in co-operative, self-directed learning environments. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 277-293). Springer Netherlands.

Kawasaki, T., Moriya, S., Okabe, Y., & Maesako, T. (2012). The problems of mathematical modelling introduction on mathematics education in Japanese school. Journal of Mathematical Modelling Application, 1 (5), 50-58.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). The strands of mathematical proficiency. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell, Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 115-155). National Academy Press.

Lamon, S. J. (2003). Beyond constructivism: An improved fitness metaphor for the acquisition of mathematical knowledge. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism - Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 435-447). Erlbaum.

Lesh, R., Young, R., & Fennewald, T. (2013). Modelling in K-16 mathematics classrooms – and beyond. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical modelling competencies (pp. 275-283). Springer US.

Meyer, J. F., Caldeira, A., & Malheiros, A. P. (2011). Modelagem em educação matemática. Autêntica.

Palharini, B., & Almeida, L. M. (2015). Mathematical modelling tasks and the mathematical thinking of students. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: Cultural, social and cognitive influences (pp. 219-228). Springer International Publishing.

Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26 (2/3), 165-190.

Ricks, T. E. (2009). Unifying current trends in mathematics education research using complexity theory. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 2(2), 63-74.

Siller, H.-S., & Kuntze, S. (2011). Modelling as a big idea in mathematics - Knowledge and views of pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(6), 33-39.

Silver, E., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., & Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 501-531.

Stender, P., & Kaiser, G. (2016). Fostering modelling competencies for complex situations. In C. R. Hirsch & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and modelling mathematics (pp. 107-115). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stillman, G. (2001). The impact of school-based assessment on the implementation of a modelling/applications-based curriculum: An Australian example. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 20(3), 101-108.

Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge University Press.


The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.

Tuck, J. (n.d.). The relationship between price elasticity and total revenue. Retrieved from Small Business Chron:

Viecili, C. R. (2006). Modelagem matemática: Uma proposta para o ensino de matemática [Master Thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul]. PUCRS Repository.

Vorhölter, K., Kaiser, G., & Borromeo Ferri, R. (2014). Modelling in mathematics classroom instruction: An innovative approach for transforming mathematics education. In Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 21-36). Springer International Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zawojewski, J. (2013). Problem solving versus modelling. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines, & A. Hurford, Modelling students' mathematical modelling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 237-243). Springer.

Zbiek, R. M., & Conner, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modelling as a context for deepening students' understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 89-112.

Zorzan, A. S. (2007). Teaching-learning: Some trends in mathematical education. Revista de Ciências Humanas, 8(10), 77-93.


Vol. 4 Iss. 2

The Effects of Instructional Strategies on Preservice Teachers’ Math Anxiety and Achievement

Janelle K. Lorenzen & Thomas J. Lipscomb

Download: 49, size: 0, date: 12.May.2021

Abstract: The results reported herein represent the quantitative portion of a mixed method investigation that employed a non-equivalent control group design conducted to determine the effects of teaching methods on math anxiety and achievement among preservice elementary teachers enrolled in a mathematics course. Two teaching methods, inquiry-based learning (IBL) and direct instruction (DI), were compared. These results indicated that math anxiety decreased significantly for the IBL group while increasing for the DI group over the course of an academic semester. There was no difference in measured learning outcomes between the two groups. A significant negative correlation between math anxiety and student achievement, however, was found. Qualitative results, discussed in a companion article, contextualize these findings and reveal that the participants attributed varying levels of math anxiety to several factors including course content, teaching methods, assessments, and student behaviors.

Keywords: Math anxiety; Achievement; Preservice teachers; Inquiry-based learning, Direct instruction; Mathematics Education

Please Cite: Lorenzen, J., K.,& Lipscomb, T., J.(2021).The Effects of Instructional Strategies on Preservice Teachers’ Math Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 133-151. DOI:

Alsup, J.  (2004).  A comparison of constructivist and traditional instruction in mathematics.  Educational Research Quarterly, 28(4), 3-17.

Althauser, K.  (2018).  The emphasis of inquiry instructional strategies: Impact on preservice teacheres’ mathematics efficacy.  Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 53-70.

Ardeleanu, R. (2019).  Traditional and modern teaching methods in mathematics.  Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education, and Didactics, 23(2), 133-140.

Ashcraft, M.H.  (1995).  Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic:  A review and summary of new directions.  Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.

Ashcraft, M.H. & Kirk, E.P.  (2001).  The relationship among working memory, math anxiety, and performance.  Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130(2), 224-237.

Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from

Bandura, A.  (1977).  Social learning theory.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Boaler, J.  (2008).  What’s math got to do with it?  New York, NY:  Viking Penguin.

Brahier, D.J.  (2013).  Teaching secondary and middle school mathematics (4th ed.).  Boston, MA:  Pearson

Buhlman, B.J. & Young, D.M.  (1982).  On the transmission of mathematics anxiety.  Arithmetic Teacher, 30(3), 55-56.

Burns, M.  (1998).  Math: Facing an American phobia.  Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.

Bursal, M. & Paznokas, L.  (2006).  Mathematics anxiety and preservice elementary teachers’ confidence to teach mathematics and science.  School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 173-180.

Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C., & Gage, N.L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Cemen, P.B.  (1987). The nature of mathematics anxiety. (Report No. SE 048 689). Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 287 729).

Cohen, J.  (1988).  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).  Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II.  Providence, RI. and Washington, DC:  American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.

Cook, T.D. & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi- experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design:  Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:  SAGE Publications, Inc.

de Jong, T. & van Joolingen, W.R. (1998).  Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains.  Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.

Dutton, W.H. & Dutton, A.  (1991).  Mathematics children use and understand.  Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Fetterly, J.M.  (2020).  Fostering mathematical creativity while impacting beliefs and anxiety in mathematics.  Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(2), 102-128.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P.  (2014).  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.  PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Harper, N.W. & Daane, C.J.  (1998).  Causes and reduction of math anxiety in preservice elementary teachers.  Action in Teacher Education, 19(4), 29-38.

Hembree, R.  (1990).  The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety.  Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33-46.

Karp, K.S.  (1988).  The teaching of elementary school mathematics:  The relationship between how mathematics is taught and teacher attitudes.  Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(08), 2138.

Karp, K.S.  (1991).  Elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics:  The impact on students’ autonomous learning skills.  School Science and Mathematics, 9(1), 265-270.

Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2013).  Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: A case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 183-199.

Laursen, S., & Hassi, M.L. (2012). Outcomes of inquiry-based learning for pre-service teachers: A multi-site study. In (Eds.) S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, and M. Oehrtman, Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, p. 88-94, Portland, Oregon.

Lubinski, C.A. & Otto, A.D.  (2004).  Preparing K-8 preservice teachers in a content course for standards-based mathematics pedagogy.  School Science and Mathematics, 104(7), 336-350.

Mestre, J.P. & Cocking, R.R. (2002).  Applying the science of learning to the education of prospective science teachers.  In R. Bybee (Ed), Learning Science and the Science of Learning (13-22).  Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Middleton, J.A. & Spanias, P.A. (1999).  Motivation for achievement in mathematics:  Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research.  Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65-88.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991).  Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics.  Reston, VA: NCTM.

Pan, W. & Tang, M.  (2005).  Students’ perceptions on factors of statistics anxiety and instructional strategies.  Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(3), 205-214. 

Prince, M.J. & Felder, R.M.  (2006).  Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases.  Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123-138.

Ramirez, G., Hooper, S., Kersting, N., Ferguson, R., & Yaeger, D.  (2018) Teacher math anxiety relates to adolescent students’ math achievement.  AERA Open, 4(1), 1-13.  

Rhoads, M.A.  (2020).  A taxonomy of behaviors by instructors that college students identified as contributing to their math anxiety [ProQuest Information & Learning]. In Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (Vol. 81, Issue 9-B).

Ronghuan, J., Liu, R., Star, J., Zhen, R., Wang, J., Hong, W., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., & Fu, X.  (2021).  How mathematics anxiety affects students’ inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection.  British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 237-260.

Rozgonjuk, D., Kraav, T., Mikkor, K., Roav-Puurand, K., & That, K.  (2020).  Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: The roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep surface approach to learning.  International Journal of STEM Education, 7. 

Schink, A.G.  (2014).  The road to present day inquiry-based learning. Retrieved from

Scholfield, H.L.  (1981).  Teacher effects on cognitive and affective pupil outcomes in elementary school mathematics.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 462-471.

Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Sloan, T.  (2010).  A quantitative and qualitative study of math anxiety among preservice teachers.  The Educational Forum, 74(3), 242-256.

Smith, T., Ware, D., Cochran, R., & Shores, M.  (2009).  Mathematical investigations in inquiry-based courses for pre-service teachers.  Retrieved from

Suinn, R.M.  (2003).  The mathematics anxiety rating scale, a brief version: Psychometric data.  Psychological Reports, 92(1), 167-173.

Szczygiel, M. (2020).  When does math anxiety in parents and teachers predict math anxiety and math achievement in elementary school children? The role of gender and grade year.  Social Psychology of Education 23(4), 1023-1054.

Thanheiser, E., Browning, C.A., Moss, M., Watanabe, T., & Garza-Kling, G.  (2010).  Developing mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary school mathematics.  Issues in the Undergraduate Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1-13.

Trujillo, K.M. & Hadfield, O.D.  (1999).  Tracing the roots of mathematics anxiety through in-depth interview with preservice elementary teachers.  College Student Journal, 33(2), 219-232.

Wu, S.S., Willcutt, E.G., Escovar, E., & Menon, V.  (2014).  Mathematics achievement and anxiety and their relation to internalizing and externalizing behaviors.  Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(6), 503-514.
Vol. 4 Iss. 2

STEM Education and Science Identity Formation

Ellina Chernobilsky

Download: 133, size: 0, date: 10.Jan.2021

As the world struggles with the COVID pandemic, one question that keeps coming up in conversations
among educators is how to teach students amid the uncertainty. Specifically, the difficulty is with
teaching subjects that require hands-on learning in order to master the concepts and make them one’s
own. Today, however, I would like to pose a different, more global question: How can we help
students identify with science in a deeper, more meaningful way? How can we help students
develop what is known as science identity?


Bordova, E. & Leong, D.J. (2005). The importance of play: Why children need to play. Early Childhood today, 20(1), 6-7.

Henrandez, P.R. et al (2017). Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0187531.

Hidi, S., & Reninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

Sage2YC (nd). Science identity. Retrieved from

Symeonidis, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (2016). Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning through the Pedagogical Lenses of Phenomenology: The Recent Curriculum Reform in Finland. Forum Oświatowe, 28(2), 31–47. Retrieved from:
Online First, Vol. 4 Iss. 1

Engaging Students in Science Using Project Olympiads: A case study in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Senol Dogan & Emrulla Spahiu

Download: 62, size: 0, date: 23.Mar.2021

Abstract: Making science enjoyable inspires students to learn more. Out-of-class activities such as science fairs and Olympiads, serve as reasonable informal learning environments that demand attention. The association of students’ involvement in these activities with increased student interest in science followed by the selection of science-related careers, should motivate all in-charge stakeholders. In this work, we analysed the outcomes of the Bosnia Science Olympiad (BSO) as the first national Science Olympiad inBosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), aiming the improvement of science education and bringing different ethnic groups under the umbrella of science, in a post-conflict area. The two-day endeavour held in Sarajevo includes competition in four science-related categories(Environment, Engineering, Have an Idea, Web Design)and social activities.In this work, the comprehensive data, including participants’ gender, their ethnic background, cities, schools, and supervisors, over fiveyears, was analysed.The number ofparticipating high-school students increased from 78 to 143, of supervisors from 21 to 95, and of schools from 7 to 15, reaching a wide demographic acceptance to cover all ethnic regions in BiH. The relationship between gender and the selection of a category, shows bias of male participants towards Web Design (21%) and Engineering (40%), and offemale students towards“Have an Idea”(40%) and Environment (44%) categories. The contribution of BSO choosing a science career, getting socialized without prejudices, and the improvement of students’ self-confidence, were as well addressed. Our work demonstrates a model work to successfully promote science in post-conflict settings.

Keywords: Olympiad; Science; STEM; education; ethnic diversity; Bosnia and Herzegovina

Please Cite: Dogan, S., & Spahiu, E. (2020). Engaging Students in Science Using Project Olympiads: A case study in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(1), 5-22. DOI:           


Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. M. (2000). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.

Alonzo, A. C., Kobarg, M., & Seidel, T. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher–student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211 – 1239.

Andersen, L., & Chen, J. A. (2016). Do high-ability students disidentify with science? A descriptive study of U.S. ninth graders in 2009: DO high-ability students disidentify with science? Science Education, 100(1), 57–77.

Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy-value models for the STEM persistence Plans of ninth-grade, high-ability students: A comparison between Black, Hispanic, and White students. Science Education, 98(2), 216–242.

Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 466 – 489.

Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy.

Bosnian Science Olympiad 2016 Gathered High Schoolers From All Over Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2016, April 9). International Burch University.

Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers’ responses to success for all: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799.

Deemer, S. (2004). Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: Revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. 46(1), 73–90.

Drew, C. (2011, November 4). Why science majors change their minds (it’s just so darn hard). The New York Times. its-just-so-darn-hard.html

Echterhoff, G. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. 4(5), 496 – 521.

Ekmekci, A., Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Almus, K. (2018). High school students’ semantic networks of scientific method in an international science olympiad context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1604.

Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3).

Fuligni, A. J., & Hardway, C. (2006). Daily variation in adolescents’sleep, activities, and psychological well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(3), 353–378.

Garrod, S., & Almeida-Porada, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181–215.

Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53, 181–215.

Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767.

Grevtseva, G. Y., Litvak, R. A., Tsiulina, M. V., Balikaeva, M. B., & Pavlichenko, A. A. (2018). Scientific Olympiad as means of students’ youth development. SHS Web of Conferences, 50, 01205.

Grinnell, F., Dalley, S., Shepherd, K., & Reisch, J. (2018). High school science fair: Student opinions regarding whether participation should be required or optional and why. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0202320.

Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14, 51–67.

Hayes, B. C., & McAllister, I. (2009). Education as a mechanism for conflict resolution in Northern Ireland. Oxford Review of Education, 35(4), 437–450.

Kang, E. J. S., Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2013). Crossing the border from science student to science teacher: Preservice teachers’ views and experiences learning to teach inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 427–447.

Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing atitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.

Klopfer, L. E. (1973). Evaluation of science achievement and science test development in an international context: The IEA study in science. Science Education, 57(3), 387–403.

Kruse, R., Howes, E. V., Carlson, J., Roth, K., Bourdelat-Parks, B., Roseman, J. E., Herrmann-Abell, C. F., & Flanagan, J. C. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an eighth grade curriculum unit that links foundational chemistry to biological growth: Changing the research-based curriculum. Online Submission.

Kususanto, P., Fui, C. S., & Lan, L. H. (2012). Teachers’ expectancy and students’ attitude towards science. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 87–98.

Lent, R. W., Lopez, A., Lopez, F., & Sheu, H. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 52–62.

Manning, B. H., & Payne, B. D. (1993). A Vygotskian-based theory of teacher cognition: Toward the acquisition of mental reflection and self-regulation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 9(4), 361–371.

Miller, L., Lietz, P., & Kotte, D. (2002). On decreasing gender differences and attitudinal changes: Factors influencing Australian and English pupils’ choice of a career in science. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 69–92.

National Research Council. (2013). Preparing the next generation of earth scientists: An examination of federal education and training programs. The National Academies Press.

Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. (2013). The National Academies Press.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I). OECD Publishing.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

Pope, D., Brown, M., & Miles, S. (2015). Overloaded and underprepared: Strategies for stronger schools and healthy, successful kids (1 edition). John Wiley & Sons.

Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 180–261.

Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883–907.

Romney, A. K., Boyd, J. P., Moore, C. C., Btachelder, W. H., & Brazil, T. J. (1996). Culture as Shared Cognitive Representations. 93, 4699 – 4705.

Sahin, A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: Effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education, 14(1), 7–13.

Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785–805.

Sanger, M. A., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2011). Teacher education, preservice teacher beliefs, and the moral work of teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27, 569–578.

Simpkins, S. D., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The intersection between self-concepts and values: Links between beliefs and choices in high school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110(31–47).

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., MacMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.

The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 Science at Grades 4, 8 and 12. (2016, October 27). National Center for Education Statistics.

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., Loof, H. D., Meester, J. D., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., Cock, M. D., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Velde, D. V. de, Petegem, P. V., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02.

Top, N., Sahin, A., & Almus, K. (2015). A stimulating experience: I-SWEEEP participants’ perceptions on the benefits of science olympiad and gender differences in competition category. SAGE Open.

Walan, S., & Ewen, B. M. (2018). Teachers’ and principals’ reflections on student participation in a school science and technology competition. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 391–412.

Walan, S., & Gericke, N. (2019). Factors from informal learning contributing to the children's???? interest in STEM: Experiences from the out-of-school activity called children's??? University. Research in Science & Technological Education, Volume missing or if online - website???1–21.

Watt, H. M. G., & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls: A motivational analysis of high school enrolments in Australia and the US. Equal Opportunities International, 25, 642–659.

Weir, K. (2016, March). Is homework a necessary evil? Monitor on Psychology, 47(3).

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000a). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educa- Tional Psychology, 25, 68 – 81.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000b). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.

Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.

Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: A model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy, 16(5), 763–782.

Yoder, B. L. (2016). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education.


Vol. 4 Iss. 1

How Engineering Technology Students Perceive Mathematics

Meher R. Taleyarkhan, Anne M. Lucietto & Therese M. Azevedo

Download: 132, size: 0, date: 16.Jan.2021

Abstract: Engineering Technology (ET) is often combined with that of Engineering. Although Engineering Technology is based on a more hands-on approach and Engineering a theoretical approach, the two majors share a very similar pedagogy in teaching students the same engineering and scientific principles. An observation by an ET professor found that ET students more often than not would eschew the use of mathematical computations and instead provide answers they believe to be correct, without computation or explanation. Leading researchers to delve into possible reasons as to why ET students are reluctant to utilize mathematics. This study utilized in-person interviews with 15 undergraduate participants from a Midwestern University in the United States of America from ET to ascertain how ET students perceive mathematics. The results of the study found that although ET students were stated to not hate mathematics and are open to using mathematics, there was a slight apprehension towards math due to bad math experiences and not being able to connect the conceptual nature of mathematics to the visual and real-life scenarios ET students are used to facing. The results of this study help to lay the foundation for future research studies geared towards further understanding why ET students are apprehensive towards mathematics and ultimately how to help ET students overcome this apprehension.

Keywords: college; engineering technology; mathematics; student

Please Cite: Taleyarkhan. M. R, Lucietto, A. M., & Azevedo, T. M. (2021). How Engineering Technology Students Perceive Mathematics. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(1), 23-43. DOI:                


Ahmed, W. (2018). Developmental trajectories of math anxiety during adolescence: Associations with STEM career choice. Journal of Adolescence, 67, 158–166.

Akin, A., & Kurbanoglu, I. N. (2011). The relationships between math anxiety, math attitudes, and self-efficacy: A structural equation model. Studia Psychologica53(3), 263.

Andrews, A., & Brown, J. (2015). The effects of math anxiety. Education135(3), 362-370.

Betz, N. E. (1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology25(5), 441.

Brzozowski, L. (2020). Math anxiety and teacher candidates. [Paper] 22nd annual Student Research and Creativity Conference. SUNY Buffalo State.

Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science26(1), 52-58.

Furner, J. M., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4), 227–242.

Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 33–46.

Jaltare, V., & Moghe, K. (2020, April). Effect of expressive writing on math anxiety of engineering students. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 804, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing.

Klein, K., & Boals, A. (2001). Expressive writing can increase working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 520–533.

Liew, J., Lench, H. C., Kao, G., Yeh, Y. C., & Kwok, O. M. (2014). Avoidance temperament and social-evaluative threat in college students' math performance: A mediation model of math and test anxiety. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping27(6), 650-661.

Lucietto, A. M., Taleyarkhan, M. R., Hobson, N., & Azevedo, T. M. (2020). 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.

Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management11, 311.

Maloney, E. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 404–406.

Perry, A. B. (2004). Decreasing math anxiety in college students. College Student Journal, 38(2), 321–325.

Primi, C., Busdraghi, C., Tomasetto, C., Morsanyi, K., & Chiesi, F. (2014). Measuring math anxiety in Italian college and high school students: Validity, reliability and gender invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS). Learning and Individual Differences34, 51-56.

QSR International (n.d.). NVivo.

Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist53(3), 145-164.

Roy, J. (2018). Engineering by the numbers. American Society for Engineering Education.

Šimić Šašić, S., Šimunić, A., Ivković, A., & Ključe, A. (2018). The correlation of perceptions of professional roles and teacher beliefs with the quality of teacher interaction. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education1(2), 207-227.

Sokolowski, H. M., Hawes, Z., & Lyons, I. M. (2019). What explains sex differences in math anxiety? A closer look at the role of spatial processing. Cognition182, 193-212.

Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2018). Effects of self-regulation strategies training on secondary students’ attitude and self-reflection toward mathematics. Journal of Research in Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(2), 143–168.

Vitasari, P., Herawan, T., Wahab, M. N. A., Othman, A., & Sinnadurai, S. K. (2010). Exploring mathematics anxiety among engineering students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 482–489.

Young, C. B., Wu, S. S., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science23(5), 492-501.
Vol. 4 Iss. 1