Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Voices of Support: Community College Instructors of Color Reflections on Fostering Self-Efficacy in Corequisite Mathematics Students

Taylor Darwin 1 * ,
Weverton Ataide Pinheiro 2
1 University of Texas at Austin2 Texas Tech University * Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 8, Issue SI, June 2025, pp. 53-78
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 746 DOWNLOADS: 55 Publication date: 15 Jun 2025
ABSTRACT
This study explores the newly adopted corequisite model in a southern U.S. state, where placed students take their developmental and traditional mathematics courses concurrently. This qualitative study, rooted in a self-efficacy framework, explored the viewpoints of four mathematics instructors of color teaching at two Texas community colleges that have implemented the corequisite model. To achieve this, semi-structured interviews were employed during Fall 2022 to explore how instructors believed they could provide the best support for their students within this innovative educational model. Through interpretive phenomenology methodology, four major themes came to light: (1) Student Challenges Perceived by the Instructor; the instructors articulated various challenges in assisting their students, (2) Instructor’s Overcoming Challenges via Encouragement and Vulnerability; despite their mentioned challenges, most instructors demonstrated a commitment to addressing their students' social and emotional needs, often by displaying vulnerability and openness, (3) Instructor’s Relatedness and Empathy to Help Students Succeed and (4) Becoming Mathematics Instructors; instructors acknowledged that their personal experiences, including instances of oppression and shared social identities such as language, race, national origin, and mathematical backgrounds, significantly shaped their identity as educators. These experiences also influenced their teaching methods and their capacity to connect with students. Overall, this study highlights how educators in the corequisite model navigate challenges, extend emotional support, and leverage their shared experiences with their students to foster a more effective and empathetic teaching environment.
KEYWORDS
mathematics education, self-efficacy, instructors of color, identity, corequisite mathematics
CITATION (APA)
Darwin, T., & Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2025). Voices of Support: Community College Instructors of Color Reflections on Fostering Self-Efficacy in Corequisite Mathematics Students. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(SI), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.413SI
REFERENCES
  1. Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2023). Gender and sexuality in mathematics education: Queer high school students’ experiences in the United States. Boletim do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Educação Matemática, (83), 78-121. https://doi.org/10.69906/GEPEM.2176-2988.2023.830
  2. Ataide Pinheiro, W., Carrizales, D., Greenlees, L., Valle, F., Cherry Shive, E., & Phelps, R. (2025a). Bilingual Teacher Candidates: Addressing Cultural Assumptions in Standardized Mathematics Assessment for Elementary Students Through Culturally Relevant Pedagogy. Education Sciences, 15(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030313
  3. Ataide Pinheiro, W., Chávez, R., & Nguyen, U. (2025b). Exploring gendered experiences of high-achieving undergraduate women in mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 13(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4361
  4. Ataide Pinheiro, W., Kaur Bharaj, P., Cross Francis, D., Kirkpatrick Darwin, T., Esquibel, J., & Halder, S. (2025c). An Investigation of Gender Biases in Teacher-Student Interaction in Mathematics Lessons Within a Virtual Teaching Simulator. In C. Wilkerson Lee, L. Bondurant, B. Sapkota, & H. Howell (Eds.), Promoting Equity in Approximations of Practice for Mathematics Teachers (pp. 201-228). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1164-6.ch009
  5. Ayllón, S., Alsina, Á., & Colomer, J. (2019). Teachers’ involvement and students’ self-efficacy: Keys to achievement in higher education. PLOS ONE, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216865
  6. Bahr, P. R., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized potential: Community college pathways to STEM baccalaureate degrees. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 430-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  9. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(03), 35–1826. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-1826
  11. Battey, D., & Franke, M. (2013). Integrating Professional Development on mathematics and equity. Education and Urban Society, 47(4), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513497788
  12. Bickerstaff, S., Barragan, M., & Rucks-Ahidiana, Z. (2017). Experiences of Earned Success: Community College Students' Shifts in College Confidence. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(3), 501-510. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1151074
  13. Bonneville-Roussy, A., Bouffard, T., Palikara, O., & Vezeau, C. (2019). The role of cultural values in teacher and student self-efficacy: Evidence from 16 nations. Contemporary educational psychology, 59, 101798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101798
  14. Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1990). Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9924591
  15. Brathwaite, J., Fay, M., & Moussa, A. (2020). Improving developmental and college- level mathematics: prominent reforms and the need to address equity. Improving Developmental and college- level mathematics: Prominent reforms and the need to address equity, 1–22. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/improving-developmental-college-level-mathematics.html
  16. Brooks, E. (2020, June 18). What is mathematics anxiety? Centre for Neuroscience in Education. Retrieved January 3, 2023, from https://www.cne.psychol.cam.ac.uk/what-is-mathematics-anxiety
  17. Card, P., & Wood, J. L. (2019). The impact of faculty validation on male students of color at community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(5), 386-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1487890
  18. Chang, J. C. (2005). Faculty Student Interaction at the community college: A focus on students of color. Research in Higher Education, 46(7), 769–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-6225-7
  19. Chen, P., Bao, C., & Gao, Q. (2021). Proactive personality and academic engagement: the mediating effects of teacher-student relationships and academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652994. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652994/full
  20. Childers, G., Hite, R., Cruz, J., Ataide Pinheiro, W., Greer, K., Noble, S., & Whitworth, C. (2024). Historically underrepresented and marginalized science fiction convention attendees’ life experiences related to science and science fiction. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10234-2
  21. Cox, J., Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2024). Advancing equitable and responsible research involving gender and sexuality within mathematics education. The Educational Forum, 88(3), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2024.2339218
  22. Darwin, T., Walkington, C., & Pruitt-Britton, T. (2022). Connecting Learning in Higher Education to Students’ Career and Personal Interests. In S. Huffman, D. Cunningham, M. Shavers, & R. Adamson (Eds.), Opening Pathways for Marginalized Individuals in Higher Education (pp. 147-170). IGI Global Publishing.
  23. Dias, A., Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2024). A scoping review of research methodologies used on studies of gender and sexuality within mathematics education. Perspectivas da Educação Matemática, 17(47), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.46312/pem.v17i47.21212
  24. Dunigan, C., Flores, K., Haynes, M., Rangel, C., Velchoff, A., & Warren, J. (2018). Design principles for corequisite mathematics: an exploration of corequisite models for Texas colleges and universities in response to state legislative change (House Bill 2223). Texas Success Center. https://tacc.org/tsc/resources?topic%5B0%5D=39
  25. Fúnez-Flores, J., Ataide Pinheiro, W., Mendoza Ávila, A., Phelps, R., Shive, E. C. (2024). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education and decolonial theory. London Review of Education, 22(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.22.1.13.
  26. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  27. Givens, T. (2021). Radical empathy: Finding a path to bridging racial divides. Policy Press.
  28. Goldberg, E. R., Darwin, T. K., Esquibel, J. S., Noble, S., Mullins, M., & Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2023). Contemporary debates on equity in STEM education: Takeaways from a doctoral seminar in Equity in STEM Education. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(SI), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.214SI
  29. Gordon, D., Blundell, C., Mills, R., & Bourke, T. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and reform: a systematic literature review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1-21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13384-022-00526-3
  30. Goroshit, M., & Hen, M. (2016). Teachers’ empathy: can it be predicted by self-efficacy?. Teachers and teaching, 22(7), 805-818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1185818
  31. Green, L. T. (1990). Test anxiety, mathematics anxiety, and teacher comments: relationships to achievement in mathematics classes. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 320. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295567
  32. Grubb, W., Boner, E., Frankel, K., Parker, L., Patterson, D., Gabriner, R., Hope, L., Schiorring, E., Smith, B., Taylor, R., Walton, I., & Wilton, S. (2021). Understanding the “crisis” in basic skills: framing the issues in community college. Understanding the “Crisis” in Basic Skills: Framing the Issues in Community College.
  33. Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the Practice of Mathematics Teachers in Context: Towards a New Equity Research Agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. 4(2), 145-187. https://edpolicyinca.org/publications/understanding-crisis-basic-skills
  34. Higbee, J., & Thomas, P. V. (1999). Affective and cognitive factors related to mathematics achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(1), 8–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ593589
  35. Hong, J., Cross Francis, D., Haskins, C., Chong, K., Aldrich, K., Ataide Pinheiro, W., Noon, S., & Dickinson, J. (2023). Wellbeing under threat: Multiply marginalized and underrepresented teachers’ intersecting identities. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 762-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2263739
  36. Hu, S., Bertrand Jones, T., Brower, R., Park, T., Tandberg, D., Nix, A., Martindale, S. (2015). Learning from the ground up (full report): Developmental education reform at Florida college system institutions. Learning From The Ground Up: Developmental Education Reform At Florida College System Institutions. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_libsubv1_scholarship_submission_1486581547
  37. Kirkpatrick Darwin, T., & Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2023). Community college mathematics instructors of color on the pursuit of supporting developmental students’ self-efficacy. Prometeica - Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias, (27), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15286
  38. Klassen, R. M., Tze, V., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21-43. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
  39. Komarraju, M., Musulkin, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2010). Role of student–faculty interactions in developing college students' academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement. Journal of college student development, 51(3), 332-342.https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0137
  40. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American educational research journal, 32(3), 465-491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
  41. Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.
  42. Maddux, J. E., & Stanley, M. A. (1986). Self-efficacy theory in contemporary psychology: An overview. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.249
  43. Magee, P. A., Willey, C., Ceran, E., Price, J., & Cervantes, J. B. (2020). The affordances and challenges of enacting culturally relevant stem pedagogy. Handbook of Research on STEM Education, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381-28
  44. Marshall, A., & Leahy, F. F. (2020). Mathematics pathways and equity: Gateway course outcomes. Emerging issues in mathematics pathways: Case studies, scans of the field, and recommendations, 137-146. https://dcmathpathways.org/sites/default/files/resources/2019-04/Emerging-Issues-in-Mathematics-Pathways_Chapter15.pdf
  45. McCoy, D. L., Luedke, C. L., & Winkle-Wagner, R. (2017). Encouraged or weeded out: Perspectives of students of color in the STEM disciplines on faculty interactions. Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0052
  46. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  47. Morris, D. B., Usher, E. L., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing the sources of teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 795-833. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-016-9378-y
  48. Narayanan, M., & Ordynans, J. (2022). Self-efficacy is a story: Teachers’ possible selves in a pandemic world. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-08-2021-0157
  49. Neto, V., & Pinheiro Ataide, W. (2021). The Problematic Issue of Gender in Mathematics Textbooks: A Comparative Analysis Between Brazil and the USA. Revista de Investigação e Divulgação em Educação Matemática, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.34019/2594-4673.2021.v5.33216
  50. Nix, A. N., Jones, T. B., Brower, R. L., & Hu, S. (2020). Equality, efficiency, and developmental education reform: the impact of SB 1720 on the mission of the Florida college system. Community College Review, 48(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552119876327
  51. Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (Eds.). (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.
  52. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189-1208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089059/
  53. Peaslee, D. (2017). The relationship between faculty confirmation and Community College student self-efficacy. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(10), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1333931
  54. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, 1st edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  55. Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1086/605771
  56. Texas Corequisite Project. (2020). Texas Corequisite Project. https://instruction.austincc.edu/txcoreqs/
  57. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2018, March). Developmental Education. https://www.highered.texas.gov/developmental-education/
  58. Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic Analysis. In The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 17–37). essay, Sage.
  59. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of educational research, 78(4), 751-796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
  60. van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
  61. Wheatley, K. F. (2005). The case for reconceptualizing teacher efficacy research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 747-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.009
  62. White, T., Bristol, T., & Britton, T. (2022). Teachers of Color & Self-efficacy in social and emotional learning (SEL): Strengthening equity-based approaches to Sel. Urban Education, 004208592211148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221114875
  63. Willey, C., & Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2019). Supporting prospective urban teachers to access children’s multiple mathematical knowledge bases: Community mathematics explorations. In: Bartell, T., Drake, C., McDuffie, A., Aguirre, J., Turner, E., Foote, M. (Eds.), Transforming mathematics teacher education (p. 57–76). Cham: Springer.
  64. Wood, J. L., Newman, C. B., & HARRIS III, F. R. A. N. K. (2015). Self-Efficacy as a Determinant of Academic Integration: An Examination of First-Year Black Males in the Community College. Western Journal of Black Studies, 39(1).
  65. Wyatt, M. (2014). Towards a re-conceptualization of teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: Tackling enduring problems with the quantitative research and moving on. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(2), 166-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.742050
  66. Wyatt, M. (2018). Language teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: A review of the literature (2005-2016). Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(4), 92-120. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1177404.pdf
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.