Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Visualizing the Invisible: The Impact of Computer Simulations on Student Attitude Towards Genetics Education

Maxwell Gyamfi 1 * ,
Isaac Owusu 2 * ,
Charles Amoah Agyei 2,
Eric Appiah-Twumasi 2
1 AAMUSTED2 Department of Integrated Science Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Asante Mampong, Ghana.* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2026, pp. 45-71
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 264 DOWNLOADS: 215 Publication date: 15 Jan 2026
ABSTRACT
This study investigates senior high school students’ attitudes toward the use of computer simulations in the teaching and learning of genetics in Ghana. Grounded in constructivist learning theory and technological integration frameworks, the research explores how interactive simulations particularly those from PhET Interactive Simulations enhance conceptual understanding, engagement, and motivation in genetics education. Employing a mixed-method descriptive survey design, data were collected from 104 SHS Biology students through questionnaires and focus group interviews. Principal Component Analysis revealed four dominant attitudinal dimensions: positive and proactive, analytic and experiential, enthusiastic and visual, practical and engaging. Quantitative findings indicated a high overall mean score (M = 3.71, SD = 0.073), reflecting strong student agreement with the benefits of simulation-based instruction. Qualitative insights further affirmed students’ enthusiasm, citing improved comprehension, visual clarity, and increased interest in genetics. Teachers also reported reduced instructional burden and enhanced student performance. The study concludes that computer simulations are a powerful pedagogical tool capable of transforming genetics education in resource-constrained contexts, provided infrastructural and training barriers are addressed.
KEYWORDS
Computer Simulation, Attitude, Genetics, Student views.
CITATION (APA)
Gyamfi, M., Owusu, I., Agyei, C. A., & Appiah-Twumasi, E. (2026). Visualizing the Invisible: The Impact of Computer Simulations on Student Attitude Towards Genetics Education. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(1), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.913
REFERENCES
  1. Abou Faour, M., & Ayoubi, Z. (2017). The effect of using virtual laboratory on grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding and their attitudes towards physics. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 4(1), 54–68.
  2. Adams, R. J. (2010). Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 61–72.
  3. Akpan, J. P., & Andre, T. (1999). The effect of a prior dissection simulation on middle school students' dissection performance and understanding of the anatomy and morphology of the frog. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 107–121.
  4. Akwee, P. E., Toili, W. W., & Palapala, V. A. (2012). Effectiveness of computer-based technology integration in teaching and learning of gene concept among high school students, Kenya. European Journal of Health and Biology Education, 1(1&2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201203
  5. Aşıksoy, G., & İşlek, D. (2017). The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’ attitude in a general physics laboratory. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), 13(04), 20–28.
  6. Barberousse, A., Franceschelli, S., & Imbert, C. (2009). Computer simulations as experiments. Synthese, 169, 557–574.
  7. Bernarducci, M. (2017). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development - Book review. European Journal of Education Studies.
  8. Bozkurt, E., & Ilik, A. (2010). The effect of computer simulations over students’ beliefs on physics and physics success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4587–4591.
  9. Çetin, H. S. (2018). Implementation of the digital assessment tool Kahoot in elementary school. International Technology and Education Journal, 2(1), 9–20.
  10. Chan, J. Y., & Bauer, C. F. (2015). Effect of peer‐led team learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attitude, and self‐concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi-experimental designs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21197
  11. Collins, A. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
  12. Council, N. R. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  13. de Hoop, T., Ring, H., Siwach, G., Dias, P., Tembo, G., Rothbard, V., & Toungui, A. (2024). Impact of technology-aided activity-based learning approaches on learning outcomes: Experimental evidence from community schools in rural Zambia. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 17(4), 836–873.
  14. Dziubaniuk, O., Ivanova-Gongne, M., & Nyholm, M. (2023). Learning and teaching sustainable business in the digital era: A connectivism theory approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00390-w
  15. Egara, F. O., Eseadi, C., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2022). Effect of computer simulation on secondary school students’ interest in algebra. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10821-8
  16. Eksail, F. A. A., & Afari, E. (2020). Factors affecting trainee teachers’ intention to use technology: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2681-2697.
  17. Gruner, S. (2012). Eric Winsberg: Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Minds and Machines, 23(2), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-012-9292-0
  18. Hong, J. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1530–1543.
  19. Howden, E. (2012). Outdoor experiential education: Learning through the body. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2012(134), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20015
  20. Jamil, S. (2018). Politics in a digital age: The impact of new media technologies on public participation and political campaign in Pakistan's 2018 elections – A case study of Karachi. Global Media Journal, 16(31), 1.
  21. Kara-Zorluoglu, D., Zorluoglu, M., Yesilyurt, E., Kaya, E., Turgut, R., Adibelli-Sahin, E., & Deniz, H. (2025, March). Predicting students’ computer science interest using pretest data: A machine learning approach. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1361–1367). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  22. Kattayat, S., Josey, S., & Asha, J. V. (2016). The relationship between simulation assisted instruction and attitude towards physics of adolescent students. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 22(1), 32–38.
  23. Kevogo, N., Toili, W., & Mutsotso, S. (2013). Effect of general computer use on secondary school students’ performance in biology. Greener Journal of Computer Sciences, 1(1), 016–030. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjcs.2013.1.111213955
  24. Khaled, A., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., van der Wel, M., & Mulder, M. (2014). Characteristics of hands-on simulations with added value for innovative secondary and higher vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(4), 462–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2014.917696
  25. Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils’ learning outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jost.0000031259.76872.f1
  26. Koomson, C. K., Safo-Adu, G., & Antwi, S. (2020). Utilising computer simulation and computerised molecular modeling software to enhance the teaching and learning of hybridisation in senior high schools. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 4(1), 044–055.
  27. Kumar, A., & Kumar, L. (2017). The effectiveness of computer assisted instruction on science achievement of secondary school students. Learning Community: An International Journal of Educational and Social Development, 8(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-458x.2017.00012.4
  28. Lanjekar, K. K., Jadhav, B. S., & Suryawanshi, A. B. (2021). Importance and impact of scientific animations in learning molecular biology by undergraduate students. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6).
  29. Lavin, A., Krakauer, D., Zenil, H., Gottschlich, J., Mattson, T., Brehmer, J., ... & Pfeffer, A. (2021). Simulation intelligence: Towards a new generation of scientific methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03235.
  30. Levy, D. (2013). How dynamic visualization technology can support molecular reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 702–717.
  31. Lin, Y., & Suh, A. (2021, January). The role of spatial ability in learning with virtual reality: A literature review. In 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2021) (pp. 94–103).
  32. Makransky, G., Bonde, M. T., Wulff, J. S., Wandall, J., Hood, M., Creed, P. A., ... & Nørremølle, A. (2016). Simulation-based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: An example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education. BMC Medical Education, 16, 1–9.
  33. Mengistu, A., & Kahsay, G. (2015). The effect of computer simulation used as a teaching aid in students’ understanding in learning the concepts of electric fields and electric forces. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 9(2), 3.
  34. Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning – A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
  35. Murugesan, M., & Jung, D. W. (2019). Johnson Cook material and failure model parameters estimation of AISI-1045 medium carbon steel for metal forming applications. Materials, 12(4), 609.
  36. Najib, M. N. M., Yaacob, A., & Md-Ali, R. (2022, October). Exploring the effectiveness of interactive simulation as blended learning approach in secondary school physics. In Proceedings (Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 103). MDPI.
  37. Nkemakolam, O. E., Chinelo, O. F., & Jane, M. C. (2018). Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students' academic achievement in chemistry in Anambra State. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(4), 284–289.
  38. Nsabayezu, E., Uwihanganye, A., & Nsengiyumva, P. (2023). Examining teachers' and students' perceptions on the use of science kits to improve chemistry performance in lower secondary schools. Journal of Classroom Practices, 2(2), 1–17.
  39. Ouahi, M. B., Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science teachers’ views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a
  40. Oymak, O., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2017). Comparison of students’ learning and attitudes in technology supported and laboratory based environments. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 6, 109–113.
  41. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
  42. Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
  43. Sari, U., Pektaş, H. M., Çelik, H., & Kirindi, T. (2019). The effects of virtual and computer based real laboratory applications on the attitude, motivation and graphic interpretation skills of university students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(1).
  44. Sifuna, J. (2016). Computer modeling for science, technology, engineering and mathematics curriculum in Kenya: A simulation-based approach to science education. Science Journal of Education, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20160401.11
  45. Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
  46. Stieff, M., & Wilensky, U. (2003). Connected chemistry—Incorporating interactive simulations into the chemistry classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 285–302.
  47. Strauss, R. T., & Kinzie, M. B. (1994). Student achievement & attitudes in a pilot study comparing an interactive videodisc simulation to conventional dissection. The American Biology Teacher, 398–402.
  48. Sugumar, D. (2024). Exploring Year 11 IGCSE students’ critical thinking in learning genetics using a virtual biology laboratory (Master's thesis, University of Malaya (Malaysia)).
  49. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(4), 541.
  50. Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of student-centered approach in improving students' graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 9.
  51. Thompson, A. D., Simonson, M. R., & Hargrave, C. P. (1996). Educational technology: A review of the research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).
  52. Tibell, L. A., & Harms, U. (2017). Biological principles and threshold concepts for understanding natural selection: Implications for developing visualizations as a pedagogic tool. Science & Education, 26, 953–973.
  53. Villena-Taranilla, R., Tirado-Olivares, S., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K–6 education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100434.West African Examinations Council (WAEC), Chief Examiner’s Report - WASSCE 2020West African Examinations Council (WAEC), Chief Examiner’s Report - WASSCE 2019
  54. Whitley, K. V., Tueller, J. A., & Weber, K. S. (2020). Genomics education in the era of personal genomics: Academic, professional, and public considerations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(3), 768.
  55. Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The effectiveness of simulation in science learning on conceptual understanding: A literature review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24(1), 35–43.
  56. Zacharia, Z., & Anderson, O. R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 618–627. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1566427
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.