Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Using Photovoice to Promote Preservice Teachers’ Socioscientific Reasoning Skills

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Online-First Articles, pp. 1-20
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 63 DOWNLOADS: 53 Publication date: 15 Jun 2025
ABSTRACT
Socioscientific issues (SSI) are complex, open-ended social issues with embedded scientific content and processes. These issues are often controversial, ill-structured problems and lack clear-cut solutions. Fostering the reasoning skills necessary to navigate these issues is essential in science education. This action research study focused on enhancing preservice teachers’ socioscientific reasoning (SSR). Specifically, photovoice was added to a water quality unit in a scientific inquiry course for preservice teachers to take photos and analyze the scientific data through photos. Results showed that learners better understood the four competencies of socioscientific reasoning after completing the photovoice activity. They demonstrated a higher level of complexity and skepticism but lower levels of ongoing inquiry and perspective-taking. The findings resulted in revisions that focused more on the issue's social aspects and more discussion on the information that is not available regarding the issue in the activity and how that information may be generated.
KEYWORDS
Socioscientific issues, Socioscientific reasoning, photovoice, preservice teachers, action research.
CITATION (APA)
Liu, C., & Buck, G. (2025). Using Photovoice to Promote Preservice Teachers’ Socioscientific Reasoning Skills. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.821
REFERENCES
  1. Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., De Checchi, K., & Munier, V. (n.d.). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21816
  2. Bellino, M. E., & Adams, J. D. (2017). A critical urban environmental pedagogy: Relevant urban environmental education for and by youth. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(4), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1336976
  3. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2009). Educational Action Research: A Critical Approach. In S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research (pp. 74–84). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  4. Cian, H. (2020). The influence of context: Comparing high school students’ socioscientific reasoning by socioscientific topic. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1767316
  5. Cole, L. B., & Altenburger, E. (2019). Framing the Teaching Green Building: Environmental education through multiple channels in the school environment. Environmental Education Research, 25(11), 1654–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1398817
  6. Cook, K. (2014). Beginning a Classroom Inquiry: Using Photovoice to Connect College Students to Community Science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 043(09), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_043_06_28
  7. Cook, K., & Buck, G. (2010). Photovoice: A Community-Based Socioscientific Pedagogical Tool. Science Scope, 33(7), 35–39.
  8. Cook, K., & Buck, G. (2014). Pre-service elementary teachers’ experience in a community of practice through a place-based inquiry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.206a
  9. Cook, K., & Quigley, C. (2013). Connecting to Our Community: Utilizing Photovoice as a Pedagogical Tool to Connect College Students to Science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.205a
  10. Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
  11. Derr, V., & Simons, J. (2020). A review of photovoice applications in environment, sustainability, and conservation contexts: Is the method maintaining its emancipatory intents? Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1693511
  12. Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
  13. Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Fostering Socioscientific Reasoning inProblem-based Learning: Examining Teacher Practice. TheInternational Journal of Learning.
  14. Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2081–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1
  15. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  16. Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of Socioscientific Reasoning. Science & Education, 28(6), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
  17. Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education 2016 47:4, 47(4), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-016-9527-9
  18. Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9
  19. Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
  20. Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi‐level Assessment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientific Issues‐based Instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
  21. Laudonia, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Abels, S., & Eilks, I. (2018). Action research in science education–an analytical review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1358198
  22. Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
  23. Leung, J. S. C. (2022). Shifting the Teaching Beliefs of Preservice Science Teachers About Socioscientific Issues in a Teacher Education Course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10177-y
  24. Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2023). Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21801
  25. McMahon, T. R., Griese, E. R., & Kenyon, D. B. (2019). Cultivating Native American scientists: An application of an Indigenous model to an undergraduate research experience. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9850-0
  26. Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Petitt, D. N., & Forbes, C. T. (2021). Exploring Undergraduates’ Breadth of Socio-scientific Reasoning Through Domains of Knowledge. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10014-w
  27. Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II. Routledge.
  28. Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017a). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
  29. Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017b). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.21368
  30. Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific Issues-Based Education: What We Know About Science Education in the Context of SSI. 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_20
  31. Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
  32. Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learning Science Content and Socio-scientific Reasoning Through Classroom Explorations of Global Climate Change. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research (pp. 45–77). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_4
  33. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  34. Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues-Development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291–2313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.920550
  35. Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz‐Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning about Socioscientific Issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903524779
  36. Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation. Health Education & Behavior, 21(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402100204
  37. Wang, C. C. (2006). Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_09
  38. Whitfield, D., & Meyer, H. (2005). Learning from Our Students: Photovoice and Classroom Action Research. Science Education Review, 4(4), 97–103.
  39. Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II, November, 697–726. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267-45
LICENSE
Creative Commons License