Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

There is no a Silver Bullet – Intentional Equity-Focused Technology Integration in Schools

Kimberley Gomez 1 *
1 Emerita University of California* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2025, pp. 1-6
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 98 DOWNLOADS: 35 Publication date: 15 Sep 2025
ABSTRACT
With over 30 years in education and as an early adopter of emerging technologies, Professor Emerita Gomez (UCLA) emphasizes that technology integration must go beyond being an afterthought. She argues it should intentionally embed equity within education programs and implementation plans by focusing on pedagogical equity, addressing systemic challenges at classroom, school, and district levels, and engaging in actionable strategies. As Prof. Gomez notes, there is no “silver bullet” to technology integration—only deliberate, equity-centered practice. Follow her as she illustrates what this looks like in classrooms, schools, districts, and broader curricula.
KEYWORDS
Equity-focused technology integration, culturally relevant pedagogy, inclusive pedagogy, computer-supported collaborative learning
CITATION (APA)
Gomez, K. (2025). There is no a Silver Bullet – Intentional Equity-Focused Technology Integration in Schools. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.831
REFERENCES
  1. Gomez K., Gomez L.M., Worsley M. (2021) Interrogating the Role of CSCL in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. In: Cress U., Rosé C., Wise A.F., Oshima J. (eds) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 19. Springer, Cham.
  2. Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2020). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4
  3. Lee, U.S.A., DeLiema, D., & Gomez, K. (2022). Equity Conjectures: A Methodological Tool for Centering Social Change in Learning and Design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 77-99.
  4. Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645
  5. Molina, E. R. (2021). Challenges Teachers Encounter When Integrating Technology in a Culturally, Linguistically, and Diverse High School. Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University.
  6. Ni, L., Bausch, G., & Benjamin, R. (2023). Computer science teacher professional development and professional learning communities: A review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 33(1), 29-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666
  7. Reding, T., & Dorn, B. (2017, August 18–20). Understanding the “teacher experience” in primary and secondary CS professional development. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Computer Science Education Research (CER’17) (Tacoma, WA, USA).
  8. Ryoo, J. J., Kali, L., & Bevan, B. (2016). Equity-oriented pedagogical strategies and student learning in after school making. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (FabLearn '16) (pp. 49–57). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003397.3003404
  9. Ryoo, J. J., Tanksley, T., Estrada, C., & Margolis, J. (2020). Take space, make space: How students use computer science to disrupt and resist marginalization in schools. Computer Science Education, 30(3), 337-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805284
  10. Ryoo, J. J., & Blunt, T. (2024). “Show them the playbook that these companies are using”: Youth voices about why computer science education must center discussions of power, ethics, and culturally responsive computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3660645
  11. Theodorio, A. O. (2024). Examining the support required by educators for successful technology integration in teacher professional development program. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2298607 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2298607
  12. Wei, W., Ha, J., Ghosh, A., & Gomez, K. (2025). Integrating Computational Thinking in Mathematics: Equity-Centered Teacher Mindsets and Asset-Based Pedagogies in Secondary Mathematics. In K. Terrell & D. S. Pimentel (Eds.), Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies in Mathematics and Technology Education: Research, Practices, and Critical Reflections (pp. 373-418). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  13. Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
  14. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000341006
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.