Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

The Impact of Teacher Technology Training on Student Technology Assessments

Preston A. Clark 1,
Mingyuan Zhang 1 *
1 Central Michigan University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 1, Issue 3, September 2018, pp. 229-266
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 780 DOWNLOADS: 373 Publication date: 15 Sep 2018
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to examine the connections that may exist between the student technology literacy performance in the national schools and teachers who have had technology-focused professional development. Utilizing the online NAEP data, the study examined two school-reported variables related to teacher technology-specific professional development and student TEL scores on a national level. The results presented here suggest that teachers with training in technology usage may be more successful with students than those without. This study may provide insight into understanding more about the relevance of teacher training with regards to technology.
KEYWORDS
Assessment of Student Technology, Data Mining, NAEP, National Data, Professional Development
CITATION (APA)
Clark, P. A., & Zhang, M. (2018). The Impact of Teacher Technology Training on Student Technology Assessments. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(3), 229-266. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.131
REFERENCES
  1. About the TEL assessment. (2014). The National Report Card. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/tel_2014/ - about/overview
  2. Becker, L. A. (2016a). Effect size calculators. Retrieved from http://www.uccs.edu/~lbecker/
  3. Becker, L. A. (2016b). Effect sizes (es). Retrieved from http://www.uccs.edu/lbecker/effect-size.html
  4. Bond, J., & Zhang, M. (2017). The Impact of conversations on fourth grade reading performance--What NAEP Data Explorer tells? European Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 407-417.
  5. Boonen, T., Van Damme, J., & Onghena, P. (2014). Teacher effects on student achievement in first grade: Which aspects matter most? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(1), 126-152.
  6. Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(2), 103-115. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2009.05.001
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1.
  9. Gebre, E., Saroyan, A., & Bracewell, R. (2014). Students' engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors' conceptions of effective teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 83-96.
  10. Gibson, P. A., Stringer, K., Cotten, S. R., Simoni, Z., O'Neal, L. J., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2014). Changing teachers, changing students? The impact of a teacher-focused intervention on students' computer usage, attitudes, and anxiety. Computers & Education, 71, 165-174. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.002
  11. Goldhaber, D., Liddle, S., & Theobald, R. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34, 29-44.
  12. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 798-812. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
  13. Henry, G. T., Purtell, K. M., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., & Patterson, K. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of teacher education, 65(1), 7-23.
  14. Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from new york city. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615-631.
  15. Klecker, B. M., & Klecker, R. L. (2014). Impact of student calculator use on the 2013 NAEP twelfth-grade mathematics assessment. Online Submission.
  16. NAGB. (2014). 2014 abridged technology and engineering literacy framework: For the 2014 national assessment of educational progress. Retrieved from https://www.nagb.org/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/technology/2014-technology-framework-abridged.pdf
  17. NCES. (2016). What does the NAEP technology and engineering literacy (tel) assessment measure? Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/tel/whatmeasure.aspx
  18. NCES. (n.d.). NAEP Data Explorer. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/
  19. Overall results. (2014). The National Report Card. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/tel_2014/ - results/overall
  20. Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111-140. doi:10.3102/0162373708317680
  21. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60-A68. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032
  22. Wang, S.-K., Hsu, H.-Y., Reeves, T. C., & Coster, D. C. (2014). Professional development to enhance teachers' practices in using information and communication technologies (icts) as cognitive tools: Lessons learned from a design-based research study. Computers & Education, 79, 101-115. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.006
  23. Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.