Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Prioritizing Expectations Through Professional Development on Mentorship for Physics Undergraduate Research

Heather McCall 1 * ,
Cameron Richards 1,
Jennifer Wilhelm 1,
Christopher Crawford 1
1 University of Kentucky* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 8, Issue SI, June 2025, pp. 79-101
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 46 DOWNLOADS: 39 Publication date: 15 Jun 2025
ABSTRACT
Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) aim to improve students' research skills, disciplinary knowledge, and career confidence. However, faculty mentors often lack formal training in effective mentoring practices. This study investigates the impact of professional development (PD) on faculty mentors in a physics REU program, focusing on communication and setting expectations, using a modified “Entering Mentoring” PD curriculum. A mixed-methods design explored three research questions: (1) What expectations do mentors establish, and how might they differ? (2) What realities do mentors experience, and how do expectations evolve? (3) What effect did PD have on mentoring, and how do interview and survey data converge to explain REU participant growth? Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight faculty mentors, post-program CIMER mentor surveys, and student surveys measuring their confidence in research abilities. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative methods, while quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-tests to assess growth among two REU cohorts: one with mentor PD and one without. Results revealed that mentors faced challenges such as affording independence to mentees and selecting achievable research projects, regardless of experience. Despite these challenges, mentors focused on the research process, rather than the product, providing students with an authentic research experience. This approach led to significant perceived growth in students' general research skills, as reported by both mentors and mentees. Synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data showed that the PD program positively influenced mentoring practices and student outcomes. The 2024 PD-trained cohort showed statistically significant growth in research independence (Q24: d=0.86) and career confidence (Q49: d=0.62) compared to the non-PD 2023 cohort. This study emphasizes the importance of PD in improving mentoring practices and enhancing student growth, offering valuable insights for future REU programs.
KEYWORDS
Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU), Professional Development (PD), Mentoring Practices, Mixed-Methods
CITATION (APA)
McCall, H., Richards, C., Wilhelm, J., & Crawford, C. (2025). Prioritizing Expectations Through Professional Development on Mentorship for Physics Undergraduate Research. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(SI), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.414SI
REFERENCES
  1. Baker, V. L., McCaffrey, V., & Manning, C. E. N. (2022). Fostering professional development through undergraduate research: Supporting faculty mentors and student researchers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(2), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2057097
  2. Baker, V. L., Pifer, M. J., Lunsford, L. G., Greer, J., & Ihas, D. (2015). Faculty as mentors in undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative work: Motivating and inhibiting factors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126164
  3. Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences (1 ed.). Guilford Press.
  4. Byars-Winston, A. E., & Dahlberg, M. L. E. (2019). The science of effective mentorship in STEMM. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568
  5. Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research. (n.d.). CIMER – Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research. https://cimerproject.org
  6. Charmaz, C., & Smit, J. (2007). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
  7. Copenheaver, C. A., & Shumaker, K. L. (2022). Mentoring summer undergraduate researchers: The faculty members' experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(2), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2022.2057096
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  9. Dolan, E. L., & Johnson, D. (2010). The undergraduate–postgraduate–faculty triad: Unique functions and tensions associated with undergraduate research experiences at research universities. CBE- Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0052
  10. Dominguez, N., & Hager, M. (2013). Mentoring frameworks: Synthesis and critique. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2013-0014
  11. Ferguson, C. F. (2023). Systematic review of outcomes for faculty mentors in undergraduate research. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 7(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/7/1/5
  12. Houser, C., Lemmons, K., & Cahill, A. (2013). Role of the faculty mentor in an undergraduate research experience. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(3), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-420.1
  13. Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
  14. Joshi, M., Aikens, M. L., & Dolan, E. L. (2019). Direct ties to a faculty mentor related to positive outcomes
  15. for undergraduate researchers. BioScience, 69(5), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz039
  16. Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191
  17. Limeri, L. B., Asif, M. Z., Bridges, B. H. T., Esparaza, D., Tuma, T. T., Sanders, D., Morrison, A. J., Rao, P., Harsh, J. A., Maltese, A. V., & Dolan, E. L. (2019). "Where's my mentor?!" Characterizing negative mentoring experiences in undergraduate life science research. CBE- Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar61. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-02-0036
  18. National Science Foundation. (2024). NSF research experiences for undergraduates.
  19. https://www.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/reu
  20. Njenga, M. (2023). Teacher participation in continuing professional development: A theoretical framework. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 29(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714221123603
  21. Shanahan, J. O., Ackley-Holbrook, E., Hall, E., Stewart, K., & Walkington, H. (2015). Ten salient practices of undergraduate research mentors: A review of the literature. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2015.1126162
  22. Stephens, A., Brenner, K., Gentile, J., Amy, S., James, G., & Kerry, B. (2017). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities (1st ed.). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24622
  23. Walkington, H., Stewart, K. A., Hall, E. E., Ackley, E., & Shanahan, J. O. (2020). Salient practices of award-
  24. winning undergraduate research mentors: Balancing freedom and control to achieve excellence. Studies in
  25. Higher Education, 45(7), 1519-1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637838
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.