Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Perceptions of Science amongst College Students: An Exploration of Tentativeness and Trust

Eva N. Nyutu 1 * ,
Bill Cobern 2,
Mina Maleki 1,
Gregory Grabowski 1,
Michelle Andrzejak 1
1 University of Detroit Mercy2 Western Michigan University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2025, pp. 25-42
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 135 DOWNLOADS: 49 Publication date: 15 Sep 2025
ABSTRACT
In this study, we extend the work of Cobern et al. (2022) by investigating college biology students' trust in science, their recognition of its tentative nature, and their perceptions of its accuracy. Understanding the nature of science (NOS)—its epistemological foundations—has long been assumed to foster confidence in scientific knowledge. However, recent discourse, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, raises questions about whether emphasizing the tentativeness of science might undermine trust rather than strengthen it. Our findings suggest a more nuanced perspective: while this ethnically diverse cohort of science majors affirms core scientific principles, including those contentious in public discourse (e.g., human evolution), trust in science is more closely tied to perceptions of its accuracy than to NOS understanding alone. Notably, students who perceive science as highly accurate exhibit significantly greater trust, whereas those with lower accuracy perceptions express greater skepticism. These findings suggest that trust in science is not merely a function of knowledge but is mediated by accuracy judgments, highlighting the need for instructional approaches that balance NOS concepts with clear communication of scientific reliability. The results underscore the complexity of fostering both scientific literacy and trust, with implications for education and future research.
KEYWORDS
: accuracy, certainty, durability, nature of science, public understanding of science, tentativeness, trust
CITATION (APA)
Nyutu, E. N., Cobern, B., Maleki, M., Grabowski, G., & Andrzejak, M. (2025). Perceptions of Science amongst College Students: An Exploration of Tentativeness and Trust. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(3), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.833
REFERENCES
  1. Chhin, C. S., Taylor, K. A., & Wei, W. S. (2018). Supporting a culture of replication: An examination of education and special education research grants funded by the Institute of Education Sciences. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 594-605.
  2. Cobern, W. W. (2020). Are we accidently teaching students to mistrust science. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education.
  3. Cobern, W. W., Adams, B. A., Pleasants, B. A., Bentley, A., & Kagumba, R. (2022). Do we have a trust problem? Exploring undergraduate student views on the tentativeness and trustworthiness of science. Science & education, 31(5), 1209-1238.
  4. Covitt, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (2022). Untangling trustworthiness and uncertainty in science: Implications for science education. Science & Education, 31(5), 1155-1180.
  5. Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(5), 736.
  6. Edelman Trust Institute. (2025). 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer: Trust and the crisis of grievance—Insights for the technology sector. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/trust/2025/trust-barometer/report-tech-sector
  7. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200.
  8. Evans, J. H., & Schairer, C. E. (2024). Scientism, trust, value alignment, views of nature, and US public opinion about gene drive mosquitos. Public Understanding of Science, 33(7), 884-901.
  9. Funk, C., Kennedy, B., & Tyson, A. (2020). Black Americans have less confidence in scientists to act in the public interest. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/28/black-americans-have-less-confidence-in-scientists-to-act-in-the-public-interest/
  10. Gill, A. P., Cobern, W. W., Adams, B., & Guda, R. (2023a). Preservice teachers: The impact of a simple teaching intervention on trust in science [Seminar paper, Mallinson Institute for Science Education, Kalamazoo, MI].
  11. Gill, A. P., Cobern, W. W., Adams, B., & Guda, R. (2023b). The impact of a simple teaching intervention on trust in science: Exploring the relationship between trust, tentative nature of science, and epistemological beliefs [Seminar paper, Mallinson Institute for Science Education, Kalamazoo, MI].
  12. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 600-620). Routledge.
  13. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again?. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 6.
  14. McComas, W. (Ed.). (2020). Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies. Springer Nature.
  15. National Science Teaching Association (NSTA). (2020). Nature of science on nature of science. Retrieved from https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/nature-science
  16. Nature. (2017). School daze : As US states turn the screw on science education, researchers everywhere should pay more attention to how their subject is presented. Nature, 543, 149.
  17. Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science ? Princeton University Press.
  18. Project 2061 (American Association for the Advancement of Science). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, 1993.
  19. Schwartz, R. (2024). Why Teach NOS? Combatting Science Denial and Mistrust. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(1), 17-22.
  20. Showalter, V. M. (1974). What is unified science education? Program objectives and scientific literacy. Prism ii, 2(3-4), 1-6.
  21. Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk analysis, 20(3), 353-362.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.