Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Navigating Science Research: The Past and Present of Global South International Graduate Students Lived Experiences

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 9, Issue SI, June 2026, pp. 137-160
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 32 DOWNLOADS: 18 Publication date: 15 Jun 2026
ABSTRACT
Epistemic injustices occur when certain people or forms of knowledge are unfairly undervalued because power dynamics distort which ideas are heard and taken seriously. This phenomenological study explores the research experiences of seven international graduate students (IGS) from the Global South who are involved in science research at a Southwest university. The exploration focuses on students’ past and present as they engage with dominant norms and knowledge systems in scientific research. The past corresponds to participants’ prior experiences in their home country; the present includes their experiences in their host country; together, these experiences shape implications for their epistemic self and institution. This exploration was achieved through a semi-structured interview, following a phenomenological approach. I delved into students’ subjective consciousness and unique judgments about what constitutes justice and injustice in their experiences. Findings indicate how participants engage in research by bridging their present and past experiences. Furthermore, findings suggest that epistemic participatory injustices experienced by participants in their prior research experiences and now in their host country call for a reflection on the effect of coloniality in doctoral programs in the US and abroad.
KEYWORDS
Epistemic Injustice, Global South Higher Education, International Students, Science Education.
CITATION (APA)
Sepúlveda Guzmán, E. (2026). Navigating Science Research: The Past and Present of Global South International Graduate Students Lived Experiences. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(SI), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.516SI
REFERENCES
  1. Agrawal, A., & Mcnair, L. D. (2021). An intersectional analysis of the English-competency experiences of international teaching assistants. Journal of International Students, 11(4), 950–969. https://10.32674/jis.vlli4.2343
  2. Bacevic, J. (2023). Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: Towards an intersectional political economy. Current Sociology, 71(6), 1122–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211057609
  3. Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228–7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019
  4. Davies, S. R. (2020). Epistemic living spaces, international mobility, and local variation in scientific practice. Minerva, 58(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09387-0
  5. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
  6. García, O., & Leiva, C. (2014). Theorizing and enacting translanguaging for social justice. In A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy (pp. 199–216). Springer.
  7. Gonzales, L. D., Pasque, P. A., Farris, K. D., & Hansen, J. M. (2024). Epistemic injustice and legitimacy in U.S. doctoral education: A systematic review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 94(3), 423–464. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231187628
  8. Grasswick, H. (2017). Epistemic injustice in science. In J. Medina, I. J. Kidd, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (1st ed., pp. 313–323). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043-31
  9. Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104
  10. Hayes, A. (2019). “We loved it because we felt that we existed there in the classroom!”: International students as epistemic equals versus double-country oppression. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319826304
  11. Hayes, A., Lomer, S., & Taha, S. H. (2024). Epistemological process towards decolonial praxis and epistemic inequality of an international student. Educational Review, 76(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2115463
  12. Hänel, H. C. (2020). Hermeneutical injustice, (self-)recognition, and academia. Hypatia, 35(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.3
  13. Hung, H., & Hyun, E. (2010). East Asian international graduate students’ epistemological experiences in an American university. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(4), 340–353. https://10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.12.001
  14. Hunter-Johnson, Y. (2022). A leap of academic faith and resilience: Nontraditional international students pursuing higher education in the United States. Journal of International Students, 12(2), 283–301. https://10.32674/jis.v12i2.1986
  15. Lee, K., & Mao, Y. (2025). Rethinking internationalisation at a distance from the perspectives of international students: Critical reflection towards epistemic justice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13550
  16. Lim, J. H., Wang, Y., Wu, T., Li, Z., & Sun, T. (2021). Walking on gender tightrope with multiple marginalities: Asian international female students in STEM graduate programs. Journal of International Students, 11(3), 647–665. https://10.32674/jis.v11i3.2132
  17. Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies (London, England), 21(2–3), 240–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162548
  18. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016) Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Oldac, Y. I., Nkansah, J. O., & Yang, L. (2024). ‘West is must, the rest is optional’: Epistemic injustice and positional good in international research collaboration. Higher Education, 88(2), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01127-4
  20. Oliveira, T., Nada, C., & Magalhães, A. (2023). Academic migration and epistemological value: Exploring the experience of migrant academics in Portugal. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070720
  21. Ploner, J. (2018). International students’ transitions to UK higher education – revisiting the concept and practice of academic hospitality. Journal of Research in International Education, 17(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240918786690
  22. Ranganathan, M., Lalk, E., Freese, L. M., Freilich, M. A., Wilcots, J., Duffy, M. L., & Shivamoggi, R. (2021). Trends in the representation of women among us geoscience faculty from 1999 to 2020: The long road toward gender parity. AGU Advances, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000436
  23. Rodriguez, M. A., Mohamed, M., & Barthelemy, R. S. (2023). Microaggressions faced by international students in the US with a discussion on critical race theory. Journal of International Students, 13(3), 236–253. https://10.32674/jis.v13i3.4620
  24. Seidman, I. E. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
  25. Skopec, M., Fyfe, M., Issa, H., Ippolito, K., Anderson, M., & Harris, M. (2021). Decolonization in a higher education STEMM institution – is ‘epistemic fragility’ a barrier? London Review of Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.18
  26. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  27. Xu, C. L. (2025). Epistemic injustice and neo-racism: Wow Zhihu users portray ‘Chinese doctoral supervisors’ working in Western academia. Higher Education, 89(5), 1275–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01272-4
LICENSE
Creative Commons License