Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Mathematics Teachers’ and Students’ Learning Evaluation for National Learning Camp: Basis for Supplementary YouTube Video Lessons

Jorelyn Estrellado Insorio 1 2 * ,
Deseree Castillo Manalo 1
1 Pacita Complex National High School2 Pacific InterContinental College* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Online-First Articles, pp. 67-94
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 67 DOWNLOADS: 34 Publication date: 15 Jan 2025
ABSTRACT
The National Learning Camp (NLC) in the Philippines aims to bridge the learning gaps created by the COVID-19 epidemic. Therefore, this study evaluated the NLC based on the perspectives of the mathematics teachers and students who participated in the camp. An explanatory sequential design was employed to gather rich data. An evaluation form and interview guide questions were used to collect data subjected to content validation and pilot testing. The findings reveal that mathematics teachers and students evaluated the NLC effectively in learning activities, materials, support, and outcomes. However, mathematics teachers experienced challenges like errors in the printed materials, hard-to-contextualize lessons, broad topics, time-consuming preparation of instructional materials, and inappropriate learning content. Similarly, students experienced challenges such as unclear printed materials, too many lessons that needed to be covered, too much content, and challenging lessons. As an output, teacher-made supplementary YouTube video lessons are created based on the students’ suggestions to help those who participate in NLC for grade 7
KEYWORDS
Evaluation, Learning Camp, Mathematics, Video Lessons
CITATION (APA)
Insorio, J. E., & Manalo, D. C. (2024). Mathematics Teachers’ and Students’ Learning Evaluation for National Learning Camp: Basis for Supplementary YouTube Video Lessons. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.814
REFERENCES
  1. Ajai, J.T. (2018) Evaluation student’s achievement in mathematics through systematic and implicit instruction, self-
  2. instruction, peer tutoring and visual representation. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 9(8), 20345-20353. https://doi.org/10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/08/577
  3. Aziz, N. A., Seman, S. A., Hashim, M. J., Roslin, R. M., & Ishar, N. I. (2019). Millennial learners’ acceptance and
  4. satisfaction of blended learning environment. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7845
  5. Balakrishnan, V. and Gan, C. L.(2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media
  6. technology for learning. Telematics Informat, 33(3) 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004
  7. Boaler, J., LaMar, T., & Williams, C. (2021). Making sense of a data-filled world. Mathematics teacher: Learning
  8. and teaching PK-12, 114(7), 508–517 https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2021.0026
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2),
  10. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. Candela, A. G. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619-628.
  12. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss3/14
  13. Caratiquit, K. (2022). YouTube videos as supplementary materials to enhance computer troubleshooting and repair
  14. techniques for senior high school students in the Philippines. International Journal of Social Learning, 2(3), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v2i3.150
  15. CAST (2018). UDL and the learning brain. Wakefield, MA: Author. http://www.cast.org/products-
  16. services/resources/2018/udl-learning-brain-neuroscience
  17. Chi, C. (6 December 2023). Philippines still lags behind the world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022.
  18. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022
  19. Christian, K., Kelly, A., & Bugallo, M. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement
  20. engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education 8(21), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
  21. Creswell, J.W., & Plano-Clark, V.L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.), Sage
  22. Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  23. Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A. & Rini, E. F. (2022). Science processing skill and critical thinking:
  24. Reviewed Based on the Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 11(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v11i1.35116
  25. David, G. R., Resuello, L., & Gara- Ancheta, M. (2024). Understanding the impact of national learning camps:
  26. Teacher volunteers experiences, teaching methods, challenges, and student learning outcomes. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(01), 2182–2195. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0245
  27. Demirtaş, Z. (2017). A general view to program evaluation approaches in education. Sakarya University Journal of
  28. Education, 7(4), 756−768. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.388616
  29. DepEd Order No. 014, s. 2023. Policy guidelines on the implementation of the national learning camp.
  30. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_014.pdf
  31. Drolet, MJ., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, JC. Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2023). Ethical issues in research:
  32. Perceptions of researchers, research ethics board members and research ethics experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21, 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3
  33. Grier, D. (2018). Efficacy of a summer math academy program to improve student motivation and student knowledge
  34. and skills in a rural southeastern community. (Published Doctoral Dissertation). Gardner-Webb University. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1307&context=education_etd
  35. Golec, A., & Kucharczyk, M. (2017). The role of feedback in the process of teaching/learning mathematics.
  36. European Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 12(2), 329-338.
  37. Hamemoradi, M., Khorasani, A., & FathiAjargah, K. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the on-the-job
  38. training courses in NIGC-based Kirkpatrick, Phillips and CIPP models. Human Resource Management in The Oil Industry, 5(19),103 – 130.
  39. Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). Video lessons via YouTube channel as mathematics interventions in
  40. modular distance learning. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), ep22001. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11468
  41. Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers
  42. Kholilah, K., Ramadhanti, A., Fitriani, R., Febri, E., &; Pratiwi, M. R. (2020). The relationship between hard work
  43. and the results of studying physics at SMA Negeri 1 Jambi City. JSEP Journal of Science Education and Practice, 4(1), 41-48.
  44. Kulegel, S., & Topsakal, U. (2020). Secondary school students’ perceptions about space camp: Space camp Turkey.
  45. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n3p154
  46. Maguate, G., Sotto, N. A., Moises, R., Ohoylan, J. G., & Alegre, A. (2024). Efficacy of National Learning Camp to
  47. literacy and numeracy of grade 7 learners. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 1(1), 68 – 72.
  48. Nabayra, J. (2023). Teacher-made videos as learning tool in elementary statistics during the pandemic: A
  49. developmental research. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1774
  50. Nabayra, J. (2020). Video-based e-module for mathematics in nature and students’ learning experiences in a flipped
  51. classroom. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 43, 1-21.
  52. Nagy, J. (2018). Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: An extension of the technology
  53. acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 160-185. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886
  54. National Council for Teacher Education (2017). 22nd Annual report 2016-2017.
  55. https://ncte.gov.in/website/PDF/AnnualReport/2016-17.pdf
  56. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2018). Evidence-based support and evaluation systems.
  57. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Research_and_Advocacy/ESSA%20Review%20Toolkit%20-%20Tool_5.pdf
  58. Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational program and curriculum evaluation
  59. models: A mini systematic review of the recent trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4048 - 4055. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080930
  60. Olsen, L. K.-P., Powell, G. M., Garst, B. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2018). Camp and college parallels: Crucibles for
  61. transition-linked turning-points. Journal of Youth Development, 13(1–2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2018.558
  62. Özkal, N. (2018). Relationship between students' math engagement and math teachers' motivational support. Turkish
  63. Journal of Education, 7(2), 86-98. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.339944
  64. Pitcock, S. (2018). The case for summer learning: Why supporting students and families all year is vitally important.
  65. American Educator, 42(1), 1-8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1173455.pdf
  66. Richmond, D., Sibthorp, J., & Wilson, C. (2019). Understanding the role of summer camps in the learning landscape:
  67. An exploratory sequential study. Journal of Youth Development, 14(3), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.780
  68. Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M., Bush, S., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Schroeder, C., Delaney, A.,
  69. Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(35), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
  70. Santibanez, L., & Fagioli, L. (2016). Nothing succeeds like success? Equity, student outcomes, and opportunity to
  71. learn in high- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4(6), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502541664205
  72. Sibthorp, J., Wilson, C., Povilaitis, V., Browne, L. (2020). Active ingredients of learning at summer camp. Journal
  73. of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 23, 21–37 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-00050-6
  74. Sundler, A., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive
  75. phenomenology. Nuring Open, 6(3), 733-739. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275
  76. Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity,
  77. Collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873-892. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14351a
  78. Syahrial, S., Kuniawan, D. A., Asrial, A., Sabil, Husni., Maryani, S., & Rini, E. F. S. (2022). Professional teachers:
  79. Study of ICT capabilities and research competencies in urban and rural? Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 17(7), 2247-2261. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i7.7590
  80. Whittington, A., & Garst, B. A. (2018). The role of camp in shaping college readiness and building a pathway to the
  81. future for camp alumni. Journal of Youth Development, 13(1–2), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.5195/JYD.2018.519
  82. Wilson, C., & Sibthorp, J. (2018). Examining the role of summer camps in developing academic and workplace
  83. readiness. Journal of Youth Development, 13(1–2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.5195/JYD.2018.563
  84. Yıldırım, S. & Yıldırım, H.H. (2019). Predicting mathematics achievement: The role of perceived feedback,
  85. teacher support and self-beliefs. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(2), 71-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.19128/turje.435345
  86. Zhu, A., Srivastava, A., Ibrahim, J., Patro, R. & Love, M. (2019). Nonparametric expression analysis using
  87. inferential replicate counts. Nucleic Acids Research 47(18):e105. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz622
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.