Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Framework as a Process: A User-Centric Conceptual Framework for Game-Based Learning

Joshua Jonas 1 * ,
Justina Ogodo 1
1 Baylor University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 8, Issue SI, June 2025, pp. 335-355
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 341 DOWNLOADS: 164 Publication date: 15 Jun 2025
ABSTRACT
This conceptual paper presents a comprehensive conceptual framework for game-based learning (GBL), emphasizing user-centric design principles. Drawing from extant literature and research in cognitive science, educational psychology, and game design, this framework establishes a foundation for an interactive user-centric design that addresses inclusive learning experiences. The in-depth review of the literature identified eleven indispensable factors crucial for efficacious GBL experiences: cognitive elements, inclusivity and accessibility, engagement strategies, progression mechanics, visualization techniques, assessment and feedback mechanisms, adaptive characteristics, emotional resonance, motivational drivers, creative risk-taking, and social and collaborative learning. Each factor's significance, interconnections, and implications for designing GBL environments to maximize learning outcomes and user satisfaction are discussed. This proposed framework provides a fundamental roadmap and a valuable resource for educators, game developers, and researchers seeking to harness the potential of GBL across various educational settings. By synthesizing current knowledge and best practices, we aim to advance the field of GBL and foster more effective, engaging, and inclusive learning experiences in the classroom.
KEYWORDS
Cognitive Factors, Educational Games, Engagement Strategies, Game-Based Learning, User-Centric Design.
CITATION (APA)
Jonas, J., & Ogodo, J. (2025). Framework as a Process: A User-Centric Conceptual Framework for Game-Based Learning. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(SI), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.4114SI
REFERENCES
  1. Adipat, S., Zhang, M., & Zhou, W. (2021). Effects of digital game‑based learning on student engagement in engineering courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106652.
  2. Aguilera, A., & de Roock, R. S. (2019). Designing with care: Toward a care ethics of digital & social innovation. Digital Creativity, 30(4), 259-278.
  3. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2018). Media violence and the general aggression model. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 386-413.
  4. Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772–790.
  5. Annetta, L. A. (2008). Video games in education: Why they should be used and how they are being used. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 229–239.
  6. Bakhsh, M., Mahmood, K., & Tayyab, M. (2022). The impact of game-based learning on student motivation and engagement: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5121–5147.
  7. Barab, S., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2007). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.
  8. Bos, M. J. W., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2020). Using Minecraft to teach computational thinking concepts through game design. Computers & Education, 158, 103998.
  9. Cheng, M.-T., & Su, T. (2020). Cognitive and motivational effects of digital game-based learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103940.
  10. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2021). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122.
  11. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  13. de Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of 'exploratory learning' for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers & Education, 52(2), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.010
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  15. Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2021). Exploring the role of engagement in learning from multiplayer online games: A comparison of World of Warcraft and Minecraft. Computers & Education, 168, 104212.
  16. Divjak, B., & Tomić, D. (2011). The impact of game-based learning on the achievement of learning goals and motivation for learning mathematics: Literature review. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 35(1), 15–30.
  17. Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., & Wiemeyer, J. (2016). Serious Games: Foundations, Concepts, and Practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1
  18. Entertainment Software Association. (2024). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. https://www.theesa.com
  19. Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167.
  20. Ferdig, R. E., & Kennedy, K. (2014). Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning. ETC Press.
  21. Ghergulescu, I., & Muntean, C. H. (2021). A novel sensor-based method of learner arousal detection during multimedia learning. Sensors, 21(15), 5211.
  22. González-González, C., & Blanco-Izquierdo, F. (2020). Minecraft and gamification: Motivational effects of game elements on learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106207.
  23. Hirumi, A., & Stapleton, C. (2008). Applying pedagogy during game development to enhance game-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3), 527–556.
  24. Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2021). Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation – A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches? The Internet and Higher Education, 49, 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791
  25. Jabbar, A. I. A., & Felicia, P. (2022). How game-based learning works and what it means for pupils, teachers, and classroom learning. In Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning (pp. 1780-1802). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  26. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, & E. Henderson-King (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 9–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47144-2_2
  27. Kardan, S., & Conati, C. (2011). A framework for capturing distinguishing user interaction behaviours in novel interfaces. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 159–168).
  28. Latif, S. (2007). The role of digital games in education: An empirical study. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 234–245.
  29. Legault, L. (2020). The psychology of motivation in game-based learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 879–902.
  30. Li, Y., Chen, D., & Deng, X. (2024). The impact of digital educational games on student's motivation for learning: The mediating effect of learning engagement and the moderating effect of the digital environment. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0294350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294350
  31. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
  32. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge University Press.
  33. Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev, D., & Faraday, S. (2008). What is independent learning and what are the benefits for students? Department for Children, Schools and Families Research Report.
  34. Mirari, K. (2022). The Effectiveness of Adaptive Learning Systems in Personalized Education. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(3), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v2i3.194
  35. Neto, L. V., Fontoura Junior, P. H. F., Bordini, R. A., Otsuka, J. L., & Beder, D. M. (2020). Design and implementation of an educational game considering issues for visually impaired people inclusion. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0103-4
  36. O'Brien, L. (2020). Has inclusion become a barrier to inclusion? The Sociological Review, 68(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12311
  37. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Harvard University Press.
  38. Raes, A., & Schellens, T. (2020). Digital game-based learning: Exploring the impact of narrative engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2287–2303.
  39. Ritterfeld, U., & Weber, R. (2006). Does playing violent video games induce aggression? Empirical evidence of a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Media Psychology, 8(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0801_4
  40. Rosen, D., Oh, Y., Chesebrough, C., Zhang, F., & Kounios, J. (2024). Creative flow as optimized processing: Evidence from brain oscillations during jazz improvisations by expert and non-expert musicians. Neuropsychologia, 190, 108824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108824
  41. Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
  42. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior.
  43. Staalduinen, M. P., & de Freitas, S. (2011). Serious games for higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 38–49.
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.