Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Exploring Effective Practices of an Elementary STEM Block Program

Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 5, Issue 3, September 2022, pp. 195-225
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 568 DOWNLOADS: 244 Publication date: 15 Sep 2022
Creating a STEM-driven culture incorporating engineering habits of mind and 21st century skills at an early age could impact students’ STEM interests and knowledge.  Therefore, early exposure to effective engineering design practices could create a foundation for a STEM program. This exploratory case study examined the integration of a STEM program in an elementary-level school. Survey, interview, focus group, and observational data were analyzed and coded to determine effective practices of the STEM program. This paper focuses on the emergent themes of the (a) critical role of the specialist, (b) instructional design, and (c) integration of the engineering laboratory.  The STEM specialist at Gemini Elementary School provided the teachers with the foundation for the in-depth acquisition of STEM content and pedagogical skills. Teachers were provided with team planning time that focused on the instructional design of the STEM Block lessons. Through collaborative settings, teachers and the specialist were able to design modern real-world problems for students that allowed students to apply engineering design practices to find solutions. The results of this study point to the need to increase the number of STEM programs embrace engineering design in elementary schools.
STEM Program, STEM education, Engineering design process, Elementary Schools, Case study
Waters, C. C. (2022). Exploring Effective Practices of an Elementary STEM Block Program. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(3), 195-225.
  1. Berland, L. K. (2013). Designing for STEM integration. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3(1), 3.
  2. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2020). Employment in STEM occupations. Retrieved from
  3. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
  4. Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352. DOI 10.1002/tea.20147
  5. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning. An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, 2. Sense Publishers.
  6. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  7. Cunningham, B. C., Hoyer, K. M., & Sparks, D. (2015). Gender differences in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) interest, credits earned, and NAEP performance in the 12th Grade. Stats in brief. NCES 2015-075. U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  8. DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84.
  9. Dym, C. L., Little, P., Orwin, E. J., & Spjut, E. (2009). Engineering design: A project-based introduction. John Wiley and sons.
  10. English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3.
  11. English, L. D. (2019). Learning while designing in a fourth-grade integrated STEM problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 1011-1032.
  12. English, L. D. (2021). Integrating Engineering Within Early STEM and STEAM Education. In: Cohrssen, C., Garvis, S. (eds) Embedding STEAM in Early Childhood Education and Care (pp. 115-133). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  13. Gormley, S. & Boland, C. (2017). The engineering design process: A middle school approach. Retrieved from /
  14. Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017). Examining Elementary Teachers’ Engineering Self-Efficacy and Engineering Teacher Efficacy. School Science and Mathematics 117 (1–2): 52–62. doi:10.1111/ ssm.12205
  15. Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2019). Elementary teachers' perceptions of K‐5 engineering education and perceived barriers to implementation. Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 503-522. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20289
  16. Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Chen, T. W., & de Miranda, M. A. (2014). Connecting the STEM dots: measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 107-120.
  17. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
  18. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.
  19. Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
  20. Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Beede, D., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). STEM: Good Jobs Now and for the Future. ESA Issue Brief# 03-11. U.S. Department of Commerce.
  21. Larson, J., Lande, M., Jordan, S. S., & Weiner, S. (2017, June). Makers as Adaptive Experts-in-Training: How Maker Design Practices Could Lead to the Engineers of the Future. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2017).
  22. Lesseig, K., Firestone, J., Morrison, J., Slavit, D., & Holmlund, T. (2019). An analysis of cultural influences on STEM schools: Similarities and differences across K-12 contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 449-466.
  23. Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education a user’s guide. Sage.
  24. Lippard, C., Lamm, M. H., Tank, K. M., & Choi, J. Y. (2019). Pre-engineering thinking and the engineering habits of mind in preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(2), 187-198.
  25. Loveland, T., & Dunn, D. (2014). Teaching engineering habits of mind in technology education. Technology and engineering teacher, 73(8), 13. Retrieved from
  26. Maiorca, C., & Mohr‐Schroeder, M. J. (2020). Elementary preservice teachers' integration of engineering into STEM lesson plans. School Science and Mathematics, 120(7), 402-412.
  27. Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM education, 6(1), 1-16.
  28. Marcos-Jorquera, D., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., & Gilar-Corbi, R. (2017). An interdisciplinary practical for multimedia engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(1), 8-15.
  29. Miller, R. K. (2017). Building on Math and Science: The New Essential Skills for the 21st-Century Engineer: Solving the problems of the 21st century will require that engineers have a new set of skills and mindsets. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 53-56.
  30. Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press.
  31. Morgan, J. R., Moon, A. M., & Barroso, L. R. (2013). Engineering better projects. In STEM project-based learning (pp. 29-39). Brill Sense.
  32. Nadelson, L. S., Pyke, P., Callahan, J., Hay, A., Pfiester, J., & Emmet, M. A. (2011). Connecting science with engineering: Using inquiry and design in a teacher professional development course.
  33. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Building capacity for teaching engineering in K-12 education. National Academies Press.
  34. National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington: National Academies Press.
  35. National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
  36. National Science Board. (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  37. National Science Foundation. (2016). U.S. science and technology leadership is increasingly challenged by advances in Asia. Retrieved from
  38. National Science Teaching Association. (2011). Quality Science Education and 21st-Century Skills.
  39. National Science Teaching Association. (2021). Position Statement STEM Education Teaching and Learning.
  40. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012.
  41. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). P21 framework for 21st century learning. The partnership for 21st century learning.
  42. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2017). 21st century skills early learning framework. Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  43. Peters-Burton, E. E., House, A., Peters, V., & Remold, J. (2019). Understanding STEM-focused elementary schools: Case study of Walter Bracken STEAM Academy. School Science and Mathematics, 119(8), 446-456.
  44. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Report to the president engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved from files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
  45. Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: a detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 1-18.
  46. Roehrig, G., Keratithamkul, K., & Hiwatig, B. M. R. (2021). Intersections of integrated STEM and socio-scientific issues. In Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development (pp. 256-278). IGI Global.
  47. Rozek, C. S., Svoboda, R. C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2017). Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(5), 909-914.
  48. Salado, A., Chowdhury, A. H., & Norton, A. (2019). Systems thinking and mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 119(1), 49-58. DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12312
  49. Sanders, M. (2008). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
  50. Sanders, M. & Wells, J. (2005). STEM graduate education / research collaboratory. Paper presented to the Virginia Tech faculty, Virginia Tech. Retrieved from
  51. Sargent Jr, J. F. (2017). The U.S. science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. Retrieved from
  52. Schneider, K. k., Bahr, D., Burkett, S., Lusth, J. C., Pressley, S., & VanBennekom, N. (2016). Jump starting research: Preresearch STEM programs. Journal Of College Science Teaching, 45(5), 13-19.
  53. Schnittka, C. G. (2012). Engineering education in the science classroom: A case study of one teacher’s disparate approach with ability-tracked classrooms. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 5.
  54. Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-16.
  55. Smith, K. L., Rayfield, J., & McKim, B. R. (2015). Effective Practices in STEM Integration: Describing Teacher Perceptions and Instructional Method Use. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(4), 182 - 201. DOI: 10.5032/Jae.2015.04183
  56. Strimel, G. (2012, June). Engineering by Design™: Preparing students for the 21st century. In PATT 26 Conference; Technology Education in the 21st Century; Stockholm; Sweden; 26-30 June; 2012 (No. 073, pp. 434-443). Linköping University Electronic Press
  57. Subramanian, R., & Clark, S. (2016). The partnership of University, Industry and K-12 Schools to improve awareness of STEM fields. Retrieved from
  58. Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Retrieved from
  59. Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania.
  60. Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 2.
  61. Waters, C. C., & Orange, A. (2022). STEM-driven school culture: Pillars of a transformative STEM approach. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 72-90.
  62. Watson, S., Williams-Duncan, O. M., & Peters, M. L. (2020). School administrators’ awareness of parental STEM knowledge, strategies to promote STEM knowledge, and student STEM preparation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-20.
  63. Wendell, K. B., Wright, C. G., & Paugh, P. (2017). Reflective decision-making in elementary students' engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 356–397.
Creative Commons License