Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Examining Growth in Preservice Science Teaching and Learning Self-Efficacy Using Mixed Methods

Bailey Nafziger 1 * ,
Alesia Mickle Moldavan 1,
Anna C Brady 1
1 Georgia Southern University* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2026, pp. 23-43
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 44 DOWNLOADS: 29 Publication date: 15 Jan 2026
ABSTRACT
Tuning in to preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for science learning and teaching allows teacher educators to construct meaningful learning experiences to build motivation and pedagogical skills in science methods courses. While literature on science teaching efficacy is robust, research focusing on how preservice teachers’ beliefs about themselves as science learners, in conjunction with their beliefs as science teachers, has yet to be adequately addressed. This study used a convergent mixed methods approach to address this gap by examining how preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for learning science evolves alongside their self-efficacy for teaching science. Preservice teachers enrolled in an elementary science methods course completed instruments assessing their beliefs in their ability to learn science and their beliefs in their ability to teach science at the beginning and end of the semester. In addition, preservice teachers completed reflective science autobiographies. Results from quantitative and qualitative data sets confirmed significant increases in preservice teachers’ self-efficacy towards learning and teaching science after participating in and creating phenomena-based elementary science lessons. Implications for teacher education include embedding reflective activities into courses and purposefully tuning in to preservice teachers’ beliefs to best support and scaffold the development of confident science learners and teachers.
KEYWORDS
Science efficacy, Science teaching efficacy, Preservice teacher education, Elementary education, Mixed methods
CITATION (APA)
Nafziger, B., Moldavan, A. M., & Brady, A. C. (2026). Examining Growth in Preservice Science Teaching and Learning Self-Efficacy Using Mixed Methods. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.912
REFERENCES
  1. Ainscough, L., Foulis, E., Colthorpe, K., Zimbardi, K., Robertson-Dean, M., Chunduri, P., & Lluka, L. (2016). Changes in biology self-efficacy during a first-year university course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  4. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
  5. Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y
  6. Bergman, D. J., & Morphew, J. (2015). Effects of a science content course on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy of teaching science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 73–81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631942
  7. Bleicher, R. E. (2006). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9067-2
  8. Bleicher, R. E., & Lindgren, J. (2005). Success in science learning and preservice science teaching self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-4861-1
  9. Boz, Y., & Cetin-Dindar, A. (2023). Teaching concerns, self-efficacy beliefs and constructivist
  10. learning environment of pre-service science teachers: A modeling study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1919079
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025974417256
  13. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypical images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  15. Deehan, J., McKinnon, D. H., & Danaia, L. (2019). A long-term investigation of the science teaching efficacy beliefs of multiple cohorts of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1672377
  16. DiBenedetto, M. K., & Bembenutty, H. (2013). Within the pipeline: Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and socialization among college students in science courses. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.015
  17. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990, April 8-11). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale [Paper presentation]. National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED319601.pdf
  18. Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882
  19. Gagnier, K. M., Holochwost, S. T., & Fisher, K. R. (2022). Spatial thinking in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Elementary teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21722
  20. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
  21. Hulings, M. (2022). What are they bringing with them? Understanding past science experiences of pre-service elementary teachers and what they mean for the science methods course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(8), 1465–1488. https://doi.org/10/1002/tea.21763
  22. Ibourk, A., & Mathis, C. (2024). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy toward teaching science. International Journal of Science Education, 47(5), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2347154
  23. National Research Council. (2023). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
  24. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  25. Novak, E., & Wisdom, S. (2018). Effects of 3D printing project-based learning on preservice elementary teachers’ science attitudes, science content knowledge, and anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9733-5
  26. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  27. Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labrake, C., & Kopp, S. (2015). Do inquiring minds have positive attitudes? The science education of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 99(5), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21177
  28. Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., White-Levatich, A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2022). Gender differences and roles of two science self-efficacy beliefs in predicting post-college outcomes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944
  29. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
  30. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
  31. Sellami, A., Santhosh, M. E., Michaleczek, I., Alazaizeh, M., & Madad, J. (2024). Unveiling teachers’ instructional self-efficacy in science, mathematics, and technology: Personal and contextual influences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24, 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-025-00359-z
  32. Starr, C., & Simpkins, S. D. (2021). High school students’ math and science gender stereotypes: Relations with their STEM outcomes and socializers’ stereotypes. Social Psychology of Education, 24, 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09611-4
  33. Thomas, G., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self‐efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI‐S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701482493
  34. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
  35. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  36. Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1086/605771
  37. Ulukütük, M. (2022). Scientific paradigm shifts and curriculum: Experiences in the transition to social constructivist education in Turkey and Singapore. In Y. Alpaydın, & C. Demirli (Eds.), Educational theory in the 21st century (pp. 25–49). Maarif Global Education Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_2
  38. Zhao, L., Lui, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). The differentiated effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A case of a modern educational technology. Sustainability, 13, 2888. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052888
  39. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.