Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education

Becoming a Globally Competent Educator: A Self-Study of My Theoretical and Practical Understandings of Global Competency

Arya Karumanthra 1 * ,
Gayle Buck 1
1 Indiana University Bloomington* Corresponding Author
Download PDF
Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Volume 7, Issue 3, September 2024, pp. 1-24
OPEN ACCESS VIEWS: 444 DOWNLOADS: 292 Publication date: 15 Sep 2024
ABSTRACT
This self-study explored my theoretical and practical understandings of my role and responsibilities regarding preparing future science educators who are globally competent. Specifically, I focused on how I changed my approach to teaching and addressing global competencies during science instruction as a science teacher educator. Using grounded theory, open coding, and the constant comparison method allowed for a comprehensive and rigorous data analysis, including journal entries, critical friend meetings, concept maps, and student artifacts. The findings of the study underscore a transformative shift in my journey toward becoming a globally competent instructor as I strived to cultivate global competence in my students. The findings and subsequent implications inform the field of science education regarding teacher educators’ role in preparing teachers to be critical change agents.
KEYWORDS
global competence, self-study, teacher preparation, science education
CITATION (APA)
Karumanthra, A., & Buck, G. (2024). Becoming a Globally Competent Educator: A Self-Study of My Theoretical and Practical Understandings of Global Competency. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.731
REFERENCES
  1. Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  2. Aikenhead, G. (1992). The integration of STS into science education. Theory Into Practice, 31(1), 27–35.
  3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543521
  4. Allender, J., & Manke, M. P. (2004, July). Evoking self in self-study: The analysis of artifacts. In Journeys of hope: Risking self-study in a diverse world. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices (Vol. 27). Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England.
  5. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Pocket guide to the 2011 annual meeting. Washington, DC: Author.
  6. Banks, J. A. (2004). Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world. In The educational forum (Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 296-305). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984645
  7. Bencze, L. (Ed.). (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE (Vol. 14). Springer.
  8. Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 48(6), 648-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20419
  9. Bencze, J. L., Carter, L., Chiu, M. H., Duit, R., Martin, S., Siry, C., ... & Kim, S. W. (2013). Globalization and science education. Cosmos, 8(02), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021960771250005X
  10. Blume, R. (1971). Humanizing teacher education. PHI Delta Kappan, 53, 411-415. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20372937
  11. Boix Mansilla, V., & Chua, F. S. (2017). Signature pedagogies in global competence education: Understanding quality teaching practice. In S. Choo, D. Sawch, A. Villanueva, & R. Vinz (Eds.), Educating for the 21st century: Perspectives, policies and practices from around the world (pp. 93–115). Springer.
  12. Boix Mansilla, V., & Jackson, A. W. (2013). Educating for global competence: Learning redefined for an interconnected world. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Mastering global literacy (pp. 5–27). Solution Tree Press.
  13. Boix-Mansilla, V., & Jackson, A. W., (2022). Educating for global competence: Preparing our students to engage the world. ACSD.
  14. Byram, M., Holmes, P., & Savvides, N. (2013). Intercultural communicative competence in foreign language education: Questions of theory, practice and research. The Language Learning Journal, 41(3), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836343
  15. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. sage.
  16. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
  17. Conceicao, P. (2020, December 8). Human Development Report 2020 - The next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4418010
  18. Crawford, E. O., Higgins, H. J., & Hilburn, J. (2020). Using a global competence model in an instructional design course before social studies methods: A developmental approach to global teacher education. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(4), 367-381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.04.002
  19. DeBoer, G. E. (2011). The globalization of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 567-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20421
  20. Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.
  21. Engel, L. C., Rutkowski, D., & Thompson, G. (2019). Toward an international measure of global competence? A critical look at the PISA 2018 framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1642183
  22. Ferguson Patrick, K., Macqueen, S., & Reynolds, R. (2014). Pre-service teacher perspectives on the importance of global education: World and classroom views. Teachers and Teaching, 20(4), 470-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.881639
  23. Flink, T., & Ruffin, N. (2019) The current state of the art of science diplomacy. In Simon, D., Kuhlmann, S., Stamm, J., & Canzler, W. (Eds). Handbook on science and public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764
  24. Gottemoeller, R. (2020). Science diplomacy: The essential interdisciplinary approach. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 76(6), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2020.1846419
  25. Hall, D. T., & Hite, R. L. (2022). School-level implementation of a state-wide professional development model for developing globally competent teachers. Teacher Development, 26(5), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2132281
  26. Hodson, D. (2010). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
  27. Kerkhoff, S. N., & Cloud, M. E. (2020). Equipping teachers with globally competent practices: A mixed methods study on integrating global competence and teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101629
  28. Koosimile, A. T., & Suping, S. M. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ attempts at debating contemporary issues in science education: A case study from Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.02.010
  29. Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Routledge.
  30. LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Springer Netherlands.
  31. Longview Foundation. (2008). Teacher preparation for the global age: The imperative for change.
  32. Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001
  33. Majewska, I. A. (2023). Teaching global competence: Challenges and opportunities. College Teaching, 71(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2022.2027858
  34. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310109
  35. Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Using Laboratory Experiences to Develop the Scientific Literacy of Middle School Students.
  36. Merryfield, M. M. (2012). Global education. In W. B. Russell III (Ed.), Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 57–76). Information Age.
  37. Mezirow, J. & Associates (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  38. Nugent, J., Smith, W., Cook, L., & Bell, M. (2015). 21st-century citizen science. The Science Teacher, 82(8), 34. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst15_082_08_34
  39. Parkhouse, H., Tichnor-Wagner, A., Cain, J. M., & Glazier, J. (2016). “You don’t have to travel the world”: Accumulating experiences on the path toward globally competent teaching. Teaching Education, 27(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2015.1118032
  40. Parmigiani, D., Bar I, A., Ferguson-Patrick, K., Forkosh Baruch, A., Heddy, E., Impedovo, M. A., Ingersoll, M., Jones, M., Kimhi, R., Lourenço, M., Macqueen, S., Pennazio, V., Sokal, L., Timkova, R., Westa, S., & Wikan, G. (2023). Assessing the development of global competence in teacher education programmes: Internal consistency and reliability of a set of rubrics. Higher Education Pedagogies, 8(1), 2216190. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2023.2216190
  41. Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
  42. Rahman, S., Liu, C., Buck, G.A. (2023). Developing Global Science Knowledge and Global Competence Skills of Preservice Elementary Teachers in an Undergraduate Science Content Course. In: Buck, G.A., Dimitrieska, V., Akerson, V.L. (eds) Internationalizing Rural Science Teacher Preparation. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46073-9_15
  43. Reagan, T. G. (2000). Non-Western Educational Traditions: Alternative approaches to educational thought and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611437
  44. Reidel, M., & Draper, C. (2013). Preparing middle grades educators to teach about world cultures: An interdisciplinary approach. The Social Studies, 104, 115–122.
  45. Reis, G. (2014). Developing a Global Perspective in/FOR Science Teacher Education: The Case of Pollination. McGill Journal of Education, 49(2), 491-500.
  46. Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2023). Learning to teach science. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1162-1196). Routledge.
  47. Sälzer, C., & Roczen, N. (2018). Assessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct. International journal of development education and global learning, 10(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183972.pdf
  48. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  49. Schuck, S. (2002). Using self-study to challenge my teaching practice in mathematics education. Reflective Practice, 3(3), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394022000034569
  50. Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500288291
  51. Science and global competency. (n.d.). Asia Society. https://asiasociety.org/education/science-and-global-competency
  52. Shulman, L. S. (2000). Fostering a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
  53. Siczek, M. M., & Engel, L. C. (2019). Teachers’ cognitive interpretation of U.S. global education initiatives. Educational Policy, 33(3), 486–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817719517
  54. Smith, W. S. (2021). Understanding students’ global interdependence in science instruction. Journal of Global Education and Research, 5(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.5038/2577-509x.5.2.1108
  55. Tamerat, J. (2020). Funds of knowledge and global competence in urban middle schools. Middle Grades Review, 6(3), 5. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/mgreview/vol6/iss3/5
  56. Thambinathan, V., & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating Spaces for Transformative Praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211014766. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
  57. Tichnor-Wagner, A., Parkhouse, H., Glazier, J., & Cain, J. M. (2019). Becoming a globally competent teacher. ASCD.
  58. Tichnor-Wagner, A., Parkhouse, H., Glazier, J., & Cain, J. M. (2016). Expanding approaches to teaching for diversity and justice in K-12 education: Fostering global citizenship across the content areas. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(59), n59. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2138
  59. UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. (2021). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  60. Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific literacy and social transformation: Critical perspectives about science participation and emancipation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
  61. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  62. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
  63. York, M. K., & Hite, R. (2021). Preservice Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Intent to Use Classroom-Based Global Collaboration (CBGC) in Their Future Classrooms. Teacher Education Quarterly, 48(2), 45-68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27094729
  64. Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  65. Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028009004
  66. Zong, G. (2022). Integrating global sustainability into social studies teachers' education: a collaborative self-study. Social Studies Research and Practice, 17(1), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-08-2021-0024
LICENSE
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.