Angela Skayia, Lucy Avraamidou, &Maria Evagorou
Abstract: The purpose of this case study was to explore how (if in any way) three informal science approaches as part of a teacher preparation program could shape preservice teachers’ personal philosophies of science teaching and learning. Data were collected in a period of two academic semesters in the context of an elementary methods course through the following sources: science autobiographies, personal philosophies about science teaching, drawings about their most memorable and least memorable experiences of science, three reflective journals about the three informal science experiences (i.e., working with scientists, field, science festival), lesson plans, responses to final exam questions, observations, and semi-structured interviews. The participants were 16 preservice elementary teachers, seven males and nine females. Open coding techniques were used to analyse the data in order to construct categories and subcategories and eventually to identify emerging themes. The outcomes of the analysis showed that the inclusion of informal learning in teachers’ preparation has the potential to support preservice teachers’ in reconstructing their ideas about science and science teaching in ways that are aligned with reform efforts emphasizing student engagement, working with scientists, and utilizing out-of-school spaces for learning.
Keywords: Informal science; Teacher education; Science education
Please Cite: Skayia A., Avraamidou, L., & Evagorou, M. (2019). How preservice teachers develop their personal philosophies about science teaching: The role of informal science approaches. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(2), 71-84.
References Anderson, D., Lawson, B., Mayer-Smith, J. (2006). Investigating the Impact of a Practicum Experience in an Aquarium on Pre-service Teacher. Teacher Education, 17(4), 341-353. Anderson, D., Lucas, K.B., Ginnis, I.S. (2003). Theoretical Perspectives on Learning in an Informal Setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177-199. Avraamidou, L. (2014). Developing a reform-minded science teaching identity: The role of informal science environments. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 823-843. Avraamidou, L. (2014). Reconceptualizing Elementary Teacher Preparation: A case for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108-135. Avraamidou, L. (2015). Stories of self and science: preservice elementary teachers’ identity work through time and across contexts. Pedagogies: An international Journal, 11(1), 43-62. Avraamidou, L. (2016). Intersections of life histories and science identities: the stories of three preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 861-884. Avraamidou, L. & Roth, W.-M. (2016). Intersections of formal and informal science. NY: Routledge. Bevan, B., Dillon, J. (2010). Broadening views of learning: Developing educators for the 21st century through an international research partnership at the Exploratorium and King's College London. The New Educator, 6(3-4), 167-180. Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., Root, D., Kilkenny, L. R., Xanthoudaki, M., Yoon, S. (2010). Making Science Matter: Collaborations Between Informal Science Education Organizations and Schools. Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Education Development Center (2014). STEM Smart Briefs: Connecting Informal and Formal STEM Education. [Online] Available: http://successfulstemeducation.org/resources/connecting-informal-and-formal-stem- education [2014, 10/8]. Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., Eylon, B. S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gab. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69-91. Fenichel, M., Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by Science: Learning in Informal Environments. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Science. Hofstein, A., Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning, Studies in Science Education, 28(1), 87-112. Kisiel, J. (2013). Introducing science teachers to science beyond the classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 67-91. Krishnamurthi, A., Rennie, L.J. (2013). Informal Science Learning and Education: Definition and Goals. [Online] Available: http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/documents/stem/rennie_krishnamurthi.pdf [2014, 10/8]. McNally, J., Blake, A., Reid, A. (2009). The informal learning of new teachers in school. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(4), 322-333. Melber, L. M., Cox-Petersen, A. M. (2005). Teacher Professional Development and Informal Learning Environments: Investigating Partnerships and Possibilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(2), 103-120. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Murmann, M., Avraamidou, L. (2013). Animals, Emperors, Senses: Exploring a Story-based Learning Design in a Museum Setting. International Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 66-91. Olson, J.K., Cox-Petersen, A. M., McComas, W.F. (2001). The Inclusion of Informal Environments in Science Teacher Preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 155-173.. Rennie, L.J. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In: Abell, S. K., Lederman, N. G. (eds): Handbook of research on science education (pp 120-144). New York: Routledge. Riedinger, K., Marbach-Ad, G., Mc-Ginnins, J., Hestness, E., Pease, R. (2010). Transforming Elementary Science Teacher Education by Bridging Formal and Informal Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(1), 51-64. Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The role of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1-44. Yin, K. R. (2003a). Case study research: Design and Methods. California: Sage Publications.